Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (1985). With consequences for all: A report from the ASCD taskforce on increased high school graduation requirements (Stock No. 611-85418). Alexandria, VA: ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 182 465.
2.
BallingerC. (1995). Prisoners no more. Educational Leadership, 53(3): 28–31.
3.
BonstinglJ. J. (1992). Schools of quality: An introduction to total quality management in education.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
4.
BottomsG., PressonA., and JohnsonM. (1992). Making high schools work through integration of academic and vocational education.Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Educational Board.
5.
BoyerE. L. (1983a). High school: Report of secondary education in America.New York: Harper.
6.
BoyerE. L. (1983b). The American high school. American Educator, pp. 30–33, 40–45.
7.
CanadyR. L. (1988). A cure for fragmented school schedules in elementary schools. Educational Leadership, 46(October): 65–67.
8.
CanadyR. L., and HotchkissR R. (1989). It's a good score! Just a had grade. Phi Delta Kappan (Septemher): 68–71.
9.
CanadyR. L. (1989). Design school scheduling structures to increase student learning. Focus in Change, 1, 2 (March): 7–8.
10.
CanadyR. L. (1990). Parallel block scheduling: A better way to organize school. Principal, 69(3): 34–36.
11.
CanadyR. L., and RettigM. D. (1992). Restructuring middle level schedules to promote equal access. Schools in the Middle (Summer): 20–26.
12.
CanadyR. L., and ReinaJ. M. (1993). Parallel block scheduling: An alternative structure. Principal, 73(3): 26–29.
13.
CanadyR. L., and RettigM. D. (1995a). The power of innovative scheduling. Educational Leadership, 53(3): 4–10.
14.
CanadyR. L., and RettigM. D. (1995b). Block scheduling: A catalyst for change in high schools.Princeton, NJ: Eye on Education.
15.
CarrollJ. M. (1989). The Copernican plan: Restructuring the American high school.Andover, MA: The Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement of the Northeast and Islands.
16.
CarrollJ. M. (1990). The Copernican plan: Restructuring the American high school. Phi Delta Kappan, 71(5): 358–365.
17.
CaweltiG. (1994). High school restructuring: A national study.Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
18.
DempsterF. N. (1993). Exposing our students to less should help them to learn more. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(6): 433–437.
19.
EdwardsC. M. (1993). Virgina's 4×4 high schools: High school, college, and more. NAASP Bulletin, 79, 571: 23–41.
20.
EdwardsC. M. (1993). The four-period day: Restructuring to improve student performance. NASSP Bulletin (May): 77–88.
21.
EdwardsC. M. (1995). The 4×4 plan. Educational Leadership, 53(3): 16–19.
22.
EdwardsC. M. (1995). Virginia's 4×4 high schools: High school, college, and more. NASSP Bulletin (May): 24–25.
23.
FullanM. G., and MilesM. B. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(2): 744–752.
24.
FulongJ., and Morrison (1994). Miniseries: School violence. School Psychology Review, 28(2).
25.
GilmanD. A., and KnollS. (1984). Increasing instructional time: What are the priorities and how do they affect the alternatives?NASSP Bulletin, 68: 41–44.
26.
GoldmanJ. J. (1983). Flexible modular scheduling: Results of evaluations in its second decade. Urban Education, 18(2): 191–228.
27.
GormanB. W. (1971). Secondary education: The high school America needs.New York: Random House.
28.
GrinselJ. G. (1989). Flexible schedueling: A second chance?American Secondary Education, 18(2): 29–31.
29.
GunterM. A., EstesT., and SchwabJ. (1990). Instruction: A model's approach.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
30.
HackmanD. C. (1995). Ten guidelines for implementing block scheduling. Educational Leadership, 53(3): 24–27.
31.
HansonB. J. (1995). Getting to know you: Multiyear teaching. Educational Leadership, 53(3): 42–43.
32.
JohnsonD. W., and JohnsonR. T. (1987). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
33.
JonesJ. H. (1995). Extending school hours: A capital idea. Journal of Educational Leadership, 53(3): 44–46.
34.
JoyceB. (1992). Models of Teaching.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
35.
JustizM. J. (1984). It's time to make every minute count. Phi Delta Kappan (March): 483–485.
36.
KaganS. (1990). Cooperative learning: Resources for teachers.San Juan Capistrano, CA: Resources for Teachers Inc.
37.
KarweitN. (1985). Should we lengthen the school term?Educational Researcher, 14(6): 9–15.
38.
MerenhloomE. Y. (1992). The Team Process: A Handbook for Teachers, 3rd ed. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
39.
MurdockL. A., HansenM. J., KraemerJ. P., VandiverK., HuntI, and HennessyJ. M. (1995). Horace's Fridays. Educational Leadership, 53(3): 37–40.
40.
National Commission on Excellence in Education (1984). A nation at risk.Cambridge, MA: USA Research.
41.
National Education Commission on Time and Learning (1994). Prisoners of time. Report of the National Education Commission on time and learning.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
42.
O'NeilJ. (1995). Finding time to learn. Educational Leadership, 53(3): 11–15.
43.
QueenJ. A., and IsenhourK. G. (1998). The 4×4 block schedule.Princeton, NJ: Eye on Education.
44.
RettigM. D. (June/July, 1995). Directory of high school scheduling models in Virginia (p. 9). Montpelier, VA: James Madison University.
45.
RossmillerR. A. (1983). Time-on-task: A look at what erodes time for instruction. NASSP Bulletin, 67: 45–49.
46.
SalvaterraM., and AdamsD. (1995). Departing from tradition: Two schools’ stories. Educational Leadership, 53(3): 28–31.
47.
SchrenkoL. (1994). Structuring a learner-centered school.Palatine, IL: IRI/Skylight Publishing.
48.
SizerT. R. (1990). Horace's school: Redesigning the American high school.Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
49.
SizerT. R. (1992). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school.Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
50.
SlavinR. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
51.
SommerfeldM. (1994). Longer year, day proposed for schooling. Education Week (May 11), pp. 1, 12.
52.
StumpfT. (1995). A Colorado school's unrocky road to trimesters. Educational Leadership, 53(3): 20–22.
53.
TrumpJ. L. (1959). Images of the future: A new approach to the secondary school.Washington, DC: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
54.
VarsG. F. (1993). Interdisciplinary teaching: Why and how?Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.