Academy of Management
. (1993). Code of ethical conduct. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1694-1698.
2.
Baumeister, R. E.
(1990, Fall). Dear journal editor, it's me again: Sample cover letter for journal manuscript resubmissions. Dialogue, 5, 16.
3.
Bedeian, A. G.
(1989). Totems and taboos: Undercurrents in the management discipline. Presidential address. Academy of Management News, 19(4), 1-6.
4.
Bedeian, A. G.
(1996). Lessons learned along the way: Twelve suggestions for optimizing career success. In P. J. Frost & M. S. Taylor (Eds.), Rhythms of academic life (pp. 3-9). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Bedeian, A. G.
, & Feild, H. S. (1981). Academic stratification in graduate management programs: Departmental prestige and faculty hiring patterns. Journal of Management, 6, 99-115.
6.
Berardo, F. M.
(1989). Scientific norms and research publication: Issues and professional ethics. Sociological Inquiry, 59, 249-266.
7.
Bevan, W.
(1991). A tour inside the onion. American Psychologist, 46, 475-483.
8.
Beyer, J. M.
(1978). Editorial policies and practices among leading journals in four scientific fields. Sociological Quarterly, 19, 68-88.
9.
Beyer, J. M.
, Chanove, R. G., & Fox, W. J. (1995). The review process and the fate of manuscripts submitted toAMJ. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1219-1260.
10.
Bornstein, R. F.
(1991). Manuscript review in psychology: Psychometrics, demand characteristics, and an alternative model. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 12, 429-468.
11.
Bowers, W. P. (1994). Research productivity and academic origins in management. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston.
12.
Campanario, J. M.
(1993). Consolation for the scientist: Sometimes it is hard to publish papers that are later highly-cited. Social Studies of Science, 23, 342-362.
13.
Caplow, T.
, & McGee, R. (1958). The academic marketplace. New York: Basic Books.
14.
Chambers, J. M.
, & Herzberg, A. M. (1968). A note on the game of refereeing. Applied Statistics, 17, 260-263.
15.
Cole, J. R.
(1989). The paradox of individual particularism and institutional universalism. Social Science Information, 28, 51-76.
16.
Cousins, R. B.
(1994). Ruminations on Professor Mowday's "Reflections on editingAMJ." Journal of Management Inquiry, 3, 99-102.
17.
Dalton, D. R.
(1995). Passing through: Observations on research and reviewing. Journal of Management, 21, 611-615.
18.
Day, R. A.
(1983). How to write and publish a scientific paper (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: ISI Press.
19.
Fiske, D. W.
, & Fogg, L. (1990). But the reviewers are making different criticisms of my paper! American Psychologist, 45, 591-598.
20.
Gans, J. S.
, & Shepherd, G. B. (1994). How are the mighty fallen: Rejected classic articles by leading economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 165-179.
21.
Garfield, E.
(1985). Ghostwriting-The spectrum from ghostwriter to reviewer to editor to coauthor. Current Contents, 17, 3-11.
22.
Ghiselli, E. E.
(1974). Some perspective for industrial psychology. American Psychologist, 29, 80-87.
23.
Harvey, J. B.
(1988). Abilene revisited: An epilogue. Organizational Dynamics, 7(1), 35-37.
24.
Hirsch, H.
(1989). Trivializing human experience: Social science methods and genocide scholarship. Armenian Review, 41(4), 71-81.
25.
Holbrook, M. B.
(1986). A note on sadomasochism in the review process: I hate when that happens. Journal of Marketing, 50, 104-108.
26.
Hull, D. L.
(1990). Particularism in science. Criticism, 32, 343-359.
27.
Kerr, S.
(1995). On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping forB. Academy of Management Executive, 9(1), 7-14.
28.
Lifton, R. J.
(1987). The future of immorality and other essays for a nuclear age. New York: Basic Books.
29.
Marwell, G.
(1992). Let's train reviewers. American Sociological Review, 57(5), iii-iv.
30.
Merton, R. K.
(1973a). The normative structure of science. In N. Storer (Ed.), The sociology of science (pp. 267-278). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original published 1942)
31.
Merton, R. K.
(1973b). Priorities in scientific discovery. In N. Storer (Ed.), The sociology of science (pp. 286-334). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original published 1957)
32.
Mills, P. A.
(1993). Accounting history as social science: A cautionary note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18, 801-803.
33.
Murphy, G.
(1969). Psychology in the year 2000. American Psychologist, 24, 523-530.
34.
Perrow, C.
(1985). Journaling careers. In L. L. Cummings & P. J. Frost (Eds.), Publishing in the organizational science (pp. 220-230). Homewood, IL: Irwin.
35.
Pfeffer, J.
(1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18, 599-620.
36.
Queenan, J.
(1989, October 16). Is it coercive, mimetic, and normative? Forbes, 237.
37.
Remus, W.
(1977). Strategies for a publish or perish world or why journals are unreadable. Interfaces, 18, 64-69.
38.
Remus, W.
(1980). Why academic journals are unreadable: The referees' crucial role. Interfaces, 10, 87-90.
39.
Sanders, J.
(1988). Never say never [Review of the book Political culture and leadership in Soviet Russia: From Lenin to Gorbachev]. The New Leader, 17(1), 19-20.
40.
Silber, J.
(1990). Free speech and the academy. Intercollegiate Review26(1), 33-41.
41.
Simon, H. A.
(1991). Models of my life. New York: Basic Books.
42.
Sternberg, R. J.
(1992). How to win acceptances from psychology journals: Twenty-one tips for better writing. APS Observer, 5, 12-13, 18.
43.
Stinchcombe, A. L.
, & Ofshe, R. J. (1969). On journal editing as a probabilistic process. American Sociologist, 4, 116-117.
44.
Whitehurst, G. J.
(1984). Interrater agreement for journal manuscript reviews. American Psychologist, 39, 22-28.
