Chaos and complexity theory, as developed in mathematics and the natural sciences, has led to major new advances in the understanding of natural phenomena that previously were considered too complex or unpatterned to comprehend. These advances have been slow to filter into organization science. A concerted effort to overcome the built-in inertia and insulation of organization science is needed. Such efforts include investment in new learning-by gatekeepers and a strengthening of ties to the natural sciences. If these efforts are not pursued, organization science will remain scientifically backward and largely irrelevant to the real organizational world.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Astley, W. G.
, & Zammuto, R. F. (1992). Organization science, managers, and language games. Organization Science, 3(4), 443-460.
2.
Cambel, A. B.
(1993). Applied chaos theory: A paradigm for complexity. San Diego: Academic Press.
3.
Cohen, J.
, & Stewart, I. (1994). The collapse of chaos: Discovering simplicity in a complex world. New York: Penguin.
4.
Freeman, J.
, & Hannan, M. T. (1989). Setting the record straight on organizational ecology: Rebuttal to Young. American Journal of Sociology, 95(2), 425-439.
5.
Gell-Mann, M.
(1994). The quark and the jaguar: Adventures in the simple and the complex. New York: Freeman.
6.
Gersick, C.J.G.
(1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 10-36.
7.
Gresov, C.
, Haveman, H. A., & Oliva, T. A. (1993). Organizational design, inertia and the dynamics of competitive response. Organization Science, 4(2), 181-208.
8.
Hambrick, D. C.
(1994). What if the Academy actually mattered?Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 11-16.
9.
Johnson, J. L.
, & Burton, B. K. (1994). Chaos and complexity theory for management: Caveat emptor. Journal of Management Inquiry, 3, 320-328.
10.
Kauffman, R. G.
, & Oliva, T. A. (1994). Multivariate catastrophe model estimation: Method and application. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 206-221.
11.
Kellert, S. H.
(1993). In the wake of chaos: Unpredictable order in dynamical systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Kochhar, R.
(1993). Organizational ecology and dissipative structures: A nonlinear paradigm of evolution. Paper presented at the 1993 meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta.
13.
Koput, K. W. (1992). Dynamics of innovative idea generation in organizations: Randomness and chaos in the development of a new medical device. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Business Administration, University of California at Berkeley.
14.
Loye, D.
, & Eisler, R. (1987). Chaos and transformation: Implications of nonequilibrium theory for social science and society. Behavioral Science, 32(1), 53-65.
15.
McKelvey, B.
(1982). Organizational systematics: Taxonomy, evolution, classification. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Meyer, A. D.
, Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175-1195.
17.
Pagels, H. R.
(1988). The dreams of reason: The computer and the rise of the sciences of complexity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
18.
Perrow, C.
(1994). Pfeffer slips!Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 191-194.
19.
Pfeffer, J.
(1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 599-620.
20.
Priesmeyer, H. R.
(1992). Organizations and chaos: Defining the methods of nonlinear management. Westport, CT: Quorum.
21.
Scott, W. R.
(1992). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
Stacey, R. D.
(1991). The chaos frontier: Creative strategic control for business. Oxford, Great Britain: ButterworthHeinemann.
23.
Stacey, R. D.
(1992). Managing the unknowable: Strategic boundaries between order and chaos in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Stewart, I.
(1989). Does God play dice? The mathematics of chaos. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
25.
Tushman, M. L.
, & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439-465.
26.
Weick, K. E.
(1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
Wheatley, M. J.
(1992). Leadership and the new science: Learning about organization from an orderly universe. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
28.
Young, R. C.
(1988). Is population ecology a useful paradigm for the study of organizations?American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 1-4.
29.
Zimmerman, B. J.
, & Hurst, D. K. (1993). Breaking the boundaries: The fractal organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2(4), 334-355.
