It is generally accepted that consensus about the features of the “high reliability” identity allow organizations performing hazardous activities to act in an error-free manner. This work challenges this assumption, providing evidence of multiple identities in a High Reliability Organization. We conducted an inductive case study in a large oil and gas producer, whose top executives emphasized safety as a central and distinctive feature of the company. Our analysis was based on extensive data: presentations, interviews, observation, and conversations. The results permit us to describe two organizational identities of safety on offshore oil platforms: “controlling” and “caring.” We found that managers and workers interpreted safety both as imposing “strict sanctions” and possessing “meaningful value.” They expressed the organizational identity through varying forms of antinomies: authoritative versus respectful interactions and resisting versus adapting actions. These dynamics of identity help us better understand the organizational process of “becoming” highly reliable.
AlbertS.WhettenD. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263–295.
2.
AlvessonM.WillmottH. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 619–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00305
3.
AndersenL. P.NørdamL.JoenssonT.KinesP.NielsenK. J. (2018). Social identity, safety climate and self-reported accidents among construction workers. Construction Management and Economics, 36(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2017.1339360
4.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. A. (1996). Oranizational identity and strategy as a context for the individual. Advances in Strategic Management, 13, 19–64.
5.
AshforthB. E.ReingenP. H. (2014). Functions of dysfunction: Managing the dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(3), 474–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839214537811
6.
AshforthB. E.RogersK. M.CorleyK. G. (2011). Identity in organizations: Exploring cross-level dynamics. Organization Science, 22(5), 1144–1156. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0591
7.
BallG. A.TrevinoL. K.SimsH. P.Jr (1994). Just and unjust punishment: Influences on subordinate performance and citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 299–322. https://doi.org/10.5465/256831
8.
BartonM. A.SutcliffeK. M. (2009). Overcoming dysfunctional momentum: Organizational safety as a social achievement. Human Relations, 62(9), 1327–1356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709334491
9.
BigleyG. A.RobertsK. H. (2001). The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1281–1299. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069401
10.
BlattR.ChristiansonM. K.SutcliffeK. M.RosenthalM. M. (2006). A sensemaking lens on reliability. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(7), 897–917. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.392
ClarkS. M.GioiaD. A.KetchenD. J.JrThomasJ. B. (2010). Transitional identity as a facilitator of organizational identity change during a merger. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(3), 397–438. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.3
ColvilleI.PyeA.CarterM. (2013). Organizing to counter terrorism: Sensemaking amidst dynamic complexity. Human Relations, 66(9), 1201–1223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712468912
15.
CorleyK. G. (2004). Defined by our strategy or our culture? Hierarchical differences in perceptions of organizational identity and change. Human Relations, 57(9), 1145–1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704047141
16.
CorleyK. G.GioiaD. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 173–208. https://doi.org/10.2307/4131471
17.
CorleyK. G.HarquailC. V.PrattM. G.GlynnM. A.FiolC. M.HatchM. J. (2006). Guiding organizational identity through aged adolescence. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492605285930
18.
CornelissenJ. P.MantereS.VaaraE. (2014). The contraction of meaning: The combined effect of communication, emotions, and materiality on sensemaking in the Stockwell shooting. Journal of Management Studies, 51(5), 699–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12073
19.
De CarvalhoP. V. R.RighiA. W.HuberG. J.LemosC. D. F.JatobaA.GomesJ. O. (2018). Reflections on work as done (WAD) and work as imagined (WAI) in an emergency response organization: A study on firefighters training exercises. Applied Ergonomics, 68, 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.10.016
ElyR. J.MeyersonD. E. (2010). An organizational approach to undoing gender: The unlikely case of offshore oil platforms. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.002
22.
Fenton-O'CreevyM.TuckettD. (2022). Selecting futures: The role of conviction, narratives, ambivalence, and constructive doubt. Futures & Foresight Science, 4, 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.111
23.
FiolC. M. (1991). Managing culture as a competitive resource: An identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063910170011
24.
FordJ. L. (2018). Revisiting high-reliability organizing: Obstacles to safety and resilience. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2017-0034
25.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Univ of California Press.
26.
GioiaD. A.PatvardhanS. D.HamiltonA. L.CorleyK. G. (2013). Organizational identity formation and change. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 123–193. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.762225
27.
GioiaD. A.SchultzM.CorleyK. G. (2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791603
28.
GlynnM. A. (2000). When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11(3), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.3.285.12496
29.
Golden-BiddleK.RaoH. (1997). Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a nonprofit organization. Organization Science, 8(6), 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.6.593
HatchM. J.SchultzM. (2000). Scaling the tower of Babel: Relational differences between identity, land culture in organizations. In The expressive organization: Linking identity, reputation, and the corporate brand (pp. 11–35). Oxford University Press.
33.
HayesJ. (2017). Operational decision-making in high-hazard organizations: Drawing a line in the sand. CRC Press.
34.
HelmreichR. L.MerrittA. (2000). Culture in the cockpit: Do Hofstede’s dimensions replicate?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 283–2301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031003001
35.
HenriqsonÉSchulerB.van WinsenR.DekkerS. W. (2014). The constitution and effects of safety culture as an object in the discourse of accident prevention: A Foucauldian approach. Safety Science, 70, 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.07.004
36.
HumphreysM.BrownA. D. (2002). Narratives of organizational identity and identification: A case study of hegemony and resistance. Organization Studies, 23(3), 421–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602233005
37.
JahnJ. L.BlackA. E. (2017). A model of communicative and hierarchical foundations of high reliability organizing in wildland firefighting teams. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(3), 356–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318917691358
38.
La PorteT. R.ConsoliniP. M. (1991). Working in practice but not in theory: Theoretical challenges of “high-reliability organizations”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 1(1), 19–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037070
39.
LevesonN.DulacN.MaraisK.CarrollJ. (2009). Moving beyond normal accidents and high reliability organizations: A systems approach to safety in complex systems. Organization Studies, 30(2-3), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608101478
40.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
41.
Lips-WiersmaM.MorrisL. (2009). Discriminating between ‘meaningful work’ and the ‘management of meaning’. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 491–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0118-9
42.
MaitlisS.SonensheinS. (2010). Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick (1988). Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 551–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00908.x
43.
MerkusS.WillemsT.SchipperD.van MarrewijkA.KoppenjanJ.VeenswijkM.BakkerH. (2017). A storm is coming? Collective sensemaking and ambiguity in an inter-organizational team managing railway system disruptions. Journal of Change Management, 17(3), 228–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2016.1219380
44.
MilosevicI.BassA. E.CombsG. M. (2018). The paradox of knowledge creation in a high-reliability organization: A case study. Journal of Management, 44(3), 1174–1201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315599215
45.
NagR.CorleyK. G.GioiaD. A. (2007). The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 821–847. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279173
46.
OsbornR. N.AshforthB. E. (1990). Investigating the challenges to senior leadership in complex, high-risk technologies. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(3), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90017-C
47.
PeysakhovichA.RandD. G. (2016). Habits of virtue: Creating norms of cooperation and defection in the laboratory. Management Science, 62(3), 631–647. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2168
48.
PrattM. G.ForemanP. O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 18–42. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791601
49.
PrattM. G.RafaeliA. (1997). Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 862–898. https://doi.org/10.5465/256951
50.
RavasiD.SchultzM. (2006). Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 433–458. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794663
51.
RobertsK. H. (1990). Some characteristics of one type of high reliability organization. Organization Science, 1(2), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.2.160
52.
RobertsK. H.StoutK. K.HalpernJ. J. (1994). Decision dynamics in two high reliability military organizations. Management Science, 40(5), 614–624. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.5.614
53.
RothE. M.MulterJ.RaslearT. (2006). Shared situation awareness as a contributor to high reliability performance in railroad operations. Organization Studies, 27(7), 967–987. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606065705
StensakerI. G.BalogunJ.LangleyA. (2021). The power of the platform: Place and employee responses to organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(2), 174–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320933736
56.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Sage publications.
57.
StraussA.SchatzmanL.EhrlichD.BucherR.SabshinM. (1963). The hospital and its negotiated order. The Hospital in Modern Society, 147(169), b52.
VogusT. J.RothmanN. B.SutcliffeK. M.WeickK. E. (2014). The affective foundations of high-reliability organizing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(4), 592–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1922
60.
WeickK. E. (1969). Social psychology in an era of social change. American Psychologist, 24(11), 990–998. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028881
61.
WeickK. E. (1987). Organizational culture as a source of high reliability. California Management Review, 29(2), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165243
62.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3). Sage.
WeickK. E.RobertsK. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 357–381. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393372
65.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M. (2015). Managing the unexpected: sustained performance in a complex world. John Wiley & Sons.
66.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M.ObstfeldD. (2005). Organization and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
67.
WileyN. (1988). The micro-macro problem in social theory. Sociological Theory, 6(2), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.2307/202119
