AnsariS.WijenF.GrayB. (2013). Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the “tragedy of the commons.”. Organization Science, 24(4), 1014–1040. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0799
2.
BansalT.SharmaG. (2022). Three different approaches to impact: Translating, cocreating and performing. Business & Society, 61(4), 827–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211015926
3.
BartunekJ. M.RynesS. L.IrelandR. D. (2006). What makes management research interesting, and why does it matter?. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 9–15.
4.
BastienF.FosterW. M.CoraiolaD. M. (2023). Indigenous peoples and organization studies. Organization Studies, 44(4), 659–675.
5.
BergerR. (2013). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
CornelissenJ.HōllererM.SeidlD. (2021). What theory is and can be: Forms of theorizing in organizational scholarship. Organization Theory, 2(1), 1–19. https:doi.org10.1177/26317877211020328
10.
CreedW. E. D.GrayB.HōllererM.KaramC.ReayT. (2022). Organizing for social and institutional change in response to disruption, division and displacement. Organization Studies, 43(10), 1535–1557. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221122237
DewulfA.BouwenR. (2012). Issue framing in conversation for change: Discursive interaction strategies for “doing differences.”. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 48(2), 168–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886312438858
Frey-HegerC.GatzweilerM.HiningsC. R. (2022). No End in sight: How regimes form barriers to addressing the wicked problem of displacement. Organization Studies, 43, 1559–1582. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406211044869
15.
GrayB. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass.
GrayB. (2019). Through the looking glass: On phantasmal tales, distortions and reflexivity in organizational scholarship. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 59, 237–253.
18.
GrayB.PurdyJ.AnsariS. (2022). Confronting power asymmetries in partnerships to address grand challenges. Organization Theory, 3, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221098765
19.
GrayB.PurdyJ. M. (2018). Collaborating for our future. Oxford University Press.
20.
GricarB. G.BarattaA. J. (1983). Bridging the information gap at three mile island: Radiation monitoring by citizens. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 19(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638301900104
21.
GümüsayA. A.ReineckeJ. (2022). Researching for desirable futures: From real utopias to imagining alternatives. Journal of Management Studies, 59(1), 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12709
22.
GuterresA. (2019). Progress toward sustainable development is seriously off-track. Financial Times, November 14.
23.
HoffmanA. (2021). The Engaged Scholar: Expanding the impact of academic research in today’s world. Stanford University Press.
24.
HochschildA. R. (2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. New York: New Press.
25.
KelmanH. C. (1995). Contributions of an unofficial conflict resolution effort to the Israeli-Palestinian breakthrough. Negotiation Journal, 11(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1995.tb00043.x
26.
LevacL.CattapanA.HaleyT. L.PinL.TungohanE.WiebeS. M. (2022). Transforming public policy with engaged scholarship: Better together. Policy & Politics, 50(3), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16485722290035
27.
MacyJ.JohnstoneC. (2012). Active hope. New World Library.
28.
MSI Integrity (2020). Not fit-for-purpose: The grand experiment of multistakeholder initiatives in corporate accountability, human rights and global governance. July, 2020. https://www.msi-integrity.org/not-fit-for-purpose/.
29.
NathanD. (2023). Developing relational resilience: Engaging youth in the midst of intractable conflict. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Twente, the Netherlands, April 17.
30.
Nhat HahnT.StanleyJ.LoyD.TuckerM. E.GrimJ. (2013). Spiritual ecology: The cry of the earth. The Golden Sufi Center.
31.
PalmerD. (2006). Taking stock of the criteria we use to evaluate one another's work: ASQ 50 years out. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 51(4), 535–559. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.4.535
32.
RaiM. (2017). Community-Led mapping for empowerment: Collectivizing adults for action in the slums of India. In RowellL.BruceC.ShoshJ.RielM. (Eds.), The Palgrave International Handbook of action research (pp. 235–250). Palgrave Macmillan.
RindovaV. R. (2008). Editor’s comments: Publishing theory when you are new to the game. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 300–303. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193160
35.
RothmanJ. (1997). Resolving identity-based conflict: In nations, organizations, and communities. Jossey-Bass.
WickertC.PostC.DohJ. P.PrescottJ. E.PrecipeA. (2021). Management research that makes a difference: Broadening the meaning of impact. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12666
38.
WilkersonI. (2020). Caste: The origins of our discontents. Random House.