There is growing evidence that the nature of work is evolving, with the emergence of new forms such as open innovation and crowdsourcing, freelancing and the gig economy and artificial intelligence, and robotics. Debates about the consequences of these changes are flourishing. However, it seems that what work means for different protagonists varies. This essay proposes to explore how philosophers have thought about work to analyze recent empirical phenomena. It combines Hannah Arendt’s distinction between labor, work, and action with Nancy Harding’s distinction between labor and work to investigate activities that might or might not be described as work. It examines two technology-enabled platforms representative of the “gig economy”: on-demand mobile workforce and crowdsourcing for innovation. More broadly, in this time of constant change, tracing conceptual boundaries between different human activities allows us to reveal the social and political implications of new activities described as work.
AigrainP. (2012). Sharing: Culture and the economy in the internet age. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
2.
AnthonyP. D. (1977). The ideology of work. Tavistock. New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
ArendtH. (1958). The human condition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1998)
4.
AtkinsonA. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done?Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BaileyD. E.KurlandN. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 383-400.
6.
BaldwinC.Von HippelE. (2011). Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science, 22, 1399-1417.
7.
BarleyS. R.BechkyB. A.MillikenF. J. (2017). The changing nature of work: Careers, identities and work lives in the 21st century. Academy of Management Discoveries, 3, 111-115.
8.
BarleyS. R.KundaG. (2006). Contracting: A new form of professional practice. Academy of Management Perspective, 19, 1-19.
9.
BelkR. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1595-1600.
10.
BenklerY. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
DeSanctisG.MongeP. (1998). Communication processes for virtual organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00083.x
23.
DietzM. G. (2000). Arendt and the holocaust. In VillaD. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Hannah Arendt (pp. 86-112). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
DiSalvoC.GreggM.LodatoT. (2014). Building belonging. Interactions, 21(4), 58-61.
25.
DohertyM. (2009). When the working day is through: The end of work as identity. Work, Employment and Society, 23(1), 84-101
26.
FarinaC. R.EpsteinD.HeidtJ.NewhartM. J. (2014). Designing an online civic engagement platform: Balancing “more” vs. “better” participation in complex public policymaking. International Journal of E-politics, 16. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/1387/
27.
FayardA. L.MetiuA.2012. The Power of Writing in Organizations: From Letters to Online Interactions. New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
FraseP. (2016). Jacobin Series. Four futures: Life after capitalism. London, UK: Verso Books.
29.
GlössM.McGregorM.BrownB. (2016, May). Designing for labour: Uber and the on-demand mobile workforce. CHI’ 16 proceedings, Association for Computing Machinery, San Jose, CA.
30.
GlucksmannM. (2005). Shifting boundaries and interconnections: Extending the “total social organization of labour.” In PettingerL.PerryJ.TaylorR.GlucksmannM. (Eds.), Special Issue: Sociological Review Monograph Series. A new sociology of work? (Vol. 53, issue 2, pp. 19-36). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
31.
GranterE. (2009). Acceptable in the 1980s: Sociology and the end of work. Sociology43 (5): 1014-1018
32.
HardingN. (2013). Routledge Studies in Management, Organizations and Society. On being at work: The social construction of the employee. New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
HegelG. W. F. (1987). La Phénoménologie de l’Esprit [The phenomenology of the spirit] (HyppoliteJ., French Trans.). Paris, France: Aubier. (Original work published 1807)
34.
HegelG. W. F. (2003). Elements of the philosophy of right (WoodA. W., Ed. and NisbetH. B.Trans., 8th ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1820)
35.
IraniL. (2015). The Cultural Work of Microwork. New Media & Society, 17(5), 720-739.
36.
KatebG. (2000). Political action: Its nature and advantages. In VillaD. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Hannah Arendt (pp. 130-148). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
KatzL. F.KruegerA. B. (2016/2019). The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015. ILR Review, 72(2), 382-416.
38.
la CourA.HøjlundH. (2008). Voluntary social work as a paradox. Acta Sociologica, 51(1), 41-54.
39.
LakhaniK.FayardA. L.LevinaN.Healy PokrywaS. (2013) (first version 2012). OpenIDEO Harvard Business School Case 612-066. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Business Publishing.
40.
LeonardiP.BaileyD.BarleyS. (2013). How virtuality impacts the way teams work. IESE Insight, 18, 32-39.
MetiuA. (2006). Owning the code: Status closure in distributed groups. Organization Science, 17, 418-435.
48.
MeyerJ. W. (2010). World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1-20.
49.
ParryJ.TaylorR.PettingerL.GlucksmannM. (2005). Confronting the challenges of work today: New Horizons and perspectives. In PettingerL.PerryJ.TaylorR.GlucksmannM. (Eds.), Special Issue: Sociological Review Monograph Series. A new sociology of work? (Vol. 53, issue 2 2, pp. 1-18). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
50.
PetriglieriG.AshfordS. J.WrzesniewskiA. (2019). Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: Cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64, 124-170.
51.
Plato. (1943). Theaetetus (RobinL.MoreauJ., Eds. and MoreauJ.RobinL., Trans.). Paris, France: La Pléiade.
52.
RifkinJ. (1995). The end of work: The decline of the global labor force and the dawn of the post-market era. New York, NY: Putnam.
53.
RosenblatA. (2018). Uberland: How algorithms are rewriting the rules of work. Oakland: University of California Press.
54.
RosenblatA.StarkL. (2016). Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758-3784.
55.
RushkoffD. (2016). Throwing rocks at the Google bus: How growth became the enemy of prosperity. New York, NY: Portfolio/Penguin.
56.
SchwartzB. (2015). Why we work. New York, NY: Ted Books.
SheridanK. M.Rosenfeld HalversonE.LittsB. K.BrahmsL.Jacobs-PriebeL.OwensT. (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84, 505-556.
59.
ShirkyC. (2010). Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age. New York, NY: Penguin.
60.
StranglemanT. (2007). The nostalgia for permanence at work? The end of work and its commentators. The Sociological Review, 55, 81-103.
61.
SundararajanA. (2018). Crowd-based capitalism, digital automation, and the future of work (The digital future of work). The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2017, Article 19.
62.
TaminiauxJ. (2000). Athens and Rome. In VillaD. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Hannah Arendt (pp. 165-177). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
63.
TaylorR. (2005). Rethinking voluntary work. In PettingerL.PerryJ.TaylorR.GlucksmannM. (Eds.), Special Issue: Sociological Review Monograph Series. A new sociology of work? (Vol. 53, issue 2, pp. 117-135). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
64.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018). Survey on Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/conemp.nr0.htm (accessed February 15, 2019)
65.
VernantJ. P. (1996). Mythe et pensée chez les grecs [Myth and thought among the Greeks] (1st ed.). Paris, France: La Découverte. (Original work published 1965)
66.
WinklerI. (2015). Nancy Harding (2013): On being at work. The social construction of the employee. Routledge: New York and London. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 4(4), 157-161.
67.
ZukinS.PapadantonakisM. (2017). Hackathons as co-optation ritual: Socializing workers and institutionalizing innovation in the “new” economy. In KallebergA. L.VallasS. P. (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Work. Precarious work (Vol. 31, pp. 157-181). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
