Institutional theory (IT) is a very influential set of approaches in organization studies. There is increasing critique that the set is becoming uninhibited: too broad, dispersed, and confusing. Efforts to rejuvinate the field(s) have led to all-embracing definitions and efforts to account for too much, which makes it difficult to identify what is distinct about the assembly of research. This article discusses critically the state of IT and suggests some reconceptualizations of institution and institutional theory and points at some alternative lines of development.
AlvessonM.BlomM. (2018). The hegemonic ambiguity of big concepts in organization studies (Working paper). Lund, Sweden: Department of Business Administration, Lund University.
2.
AlvessonM.SpicerA. (2019). Neo-institutional theory and organization studies: A mid-life crisis?Organization Studies, 40, 199-218.
3.
BaronJ.Devereaux JenningsP.DobbinF. (1988). Mission control? The development of personnel systems in U.S. industry. American Sociological Review, 53, 497-514.
4.
BaronJ.DobbinF.Devereaux JenningsP. (1986). War and peace: The evolution of modern personnel administration in U.S. industry. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 250-283.
5.
ChavesM. (1996). Ordaining women: The diffusion of an organizational innovation. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 840-873.
6.
CherlinA. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848-861.
7.
ClarkB. (1956). Organizational adaptation and precarious values: A case study. American Sociological Review, 21, 327-336.
8.
ClarkB. (1970). The distinctive college. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.
9.
ColomyP. (1998). Neofunctionalism and neoinstitutionalism: Human agency and interest in institutional change. Sociological Forum, 13, 265-300.
10.
DacinT.MunirK.TraceyP. (2010). Formal dining at Cambridge colleges: Linking ritual performance and institutional maintenance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1393-1418.
11.
DavidR.BitektineA. (2009). The deinstitutionalization of institutional theory? In BuchananD.BrymanA. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 160-175). London, England: Sage.
12.
DavisM. S. (1971). That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1, 309-344.
13.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
14.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1991). Introduction. In DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1-39). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
ElsbachK. D.SuttonR. I. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 699-738.
16.
FriedlandR.AlfordR. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232-265). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
GarudR.HardyC.MaguireS. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28, 957-969.
18.
GreenS.LiY. (2011). Rhetorical institutionalism: Language, agency, and structure in institutional theory since Alvesson 1993. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1662-1697.
19.
GreenwoodR. C.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (2008). Introduction. In GreenwoodR. C.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 1-46). London, England: Sage.
20.
HallE. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
21.
HallettT. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75, 52-74.
22.
HavemanH. A.DavidR. J. (2008). Ecologists and institutionalists: Friends or foes? In GreenwoodR. C.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 573-595). London, England: Sage.
23.
HudsonB. A.OkhuysenG. A. (2009). Not with a ten-foot pole: Core stigma, stigma transfer, and improbable persistence of men’s bathhouses. Organization Science, 20, 134-153.
24.
HwangH.PowellW. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54, 268-298.
25.
JackallR. (1988). Moral mazes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
KhaireM.WadhwaniR. D. (2010). Changing landscapes: The construction of meaning and value in a new market category—Modern Indian art. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1281-1304.
27.
KraatzM. (2009). Leadership as institutional work: A bridge to the other side. In LawrenceT.SuddabyR.LecaB. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 59-91). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KraatzM. (2011). Two cheers for institutional work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 59-61.
29.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR. (2006). Institutional work. In CleggS.HardyC.LawrenceT. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 215-254). London, England: Sage.
30.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 52-58.
31.
LiskaA. E. (1969). Uses and misuses of tautologies in social psychology. Sociometry, 32, 444-457.
32.
LounsburyM.CrumleyE. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28, 993-1012.
33.
MeadG. H. (1932). The philosophy of the present. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
34.
MessingerS. (1955). Organizational transformation: A case study of a declining social movement. American Sociological Review, 20, 3-10.
35.
MeyerJ. W.BoliJ.ThomasG. (1987). Ontology and rationalization in the western cultural account. In ThomasG. M.MeyerJ. W.RamirezF. O.BoliJ. (Eds.), Institutional structure: Constituting state, society, and the individual (pp. 12-27). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
37.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1978). The structure of educational organizations. In MeyerM. W. (Ed.), Environments and organizations (pp. 78-109). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
38.
MeyerR. E.HöllererM. (2014). Does institutional theory need redirecting?Journal of Management Studies, 51, 1221-1233.
39.
PerkmannM.SpicerA. (2014). How emerging organizations take form: The role of imprinting and values in organizational bricolage. Organization Science, 25(6), 1785-1806.
40.
PurdyJ.AnsariS.GrayB. (2017). Are logics enough? Framing as an alternative tool for understanding institutional meaning making. Journal of Management Inquiry. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1056492617724233
41.
ScottW. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
SelznickP. (1943). An approach to a theory of bureaucracy. American Sociological Review, 8, 47-54.
43.
SelznickP. (1948). Foundations for a theory of organizations. American Sociological Review, 13, 23-35.
44.
SelznickP. (1949). TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
SelznickP. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
46.
StinchcombeA. L. (1997). On the virtues of the old institutionalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 1-18.
47.
SuddabyR. (2010). Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 14-20.
48.
SuttonJ.DobbinF.MeyerJ. W.ScottW. R. (1994). The legalization of the workplace. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 944-971.
49.
ThorntonP.OcasioW.LounsburyM. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
TolbertP. S.ZuckerL. G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 22-39.
51.
TolbertP. S.ZuckerL. G. (1996). The institutionalization of institutional theory. In CleggS.HardyC.NordW. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 175-190). London, England: Sage.
52.
van der VoetJ. (2014). Three times around institutional theory: The coherence, connection and contribution of three recent books. Organization, 21, 126-132.
53.
WillmottH. (2011). “Institutional work” for what? Problems and prospects of institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 67-72.
54.
ZaldM. N.DentonP. (1963). From evangelism to general service: The transformation of the YMCA. Administrative Science Quarterly, 8, 214-234.
55.
ZuckerL. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42, 726-743.
