In this essay, we explore and discuss current practices of source critique. In our empirical analysis of a sample of interview-based studies, we find that few studies show a careful and reflective stance toward their sources. In the majority of cases, we discern a tendency to either ignore basic issues of the trustworthiness of interview material or produce technical descriptions which seem to have no real effect on the actual assessment of the study’s sources. We suggest five epistemic attitudes which describe how scholars engage—or rather not engage—in source critique. To improve source critique, we suggest tactics of intra- and extrasource critique which seriously consider interactional dynamics behind and quality of interview content other than “truth” reporting, aiming to corroborate interview statements by carefully cross-checking interview material with observations and multiple sources.
AléxL.HammarströmA. (2008). Shift in power during an interview situation: Methodological reflections inspired by Foucault and Bourdieu. Nursing Inquiry, 15, 169-176.
2.
AlvessonM. (2003). Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: a reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 28, 13-33.
AlvessonM.GabrielY. (2013). Beyond formulaic research. In praise of greater diversity in organizational research and publications. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 12, 245-263.
5.
AlvessonM.JonssonA. (2017). The bumpy road to exercising leadership. Fragmentations in meaning and practice. Leadership, 19April, 2016, DOI 10.1177/1742715016644671.
6.
AlvessonM.SköldbergK. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London, England: Sage.
7.
AtkinsonP.SilvermanD. (1997). Kundera’s immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 304-325.
8.
BarghJ. A.ChenM.BurrowsL. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
9.
BarleyS. R. (2016). 60th Anniversary Essay: Ruminations on how we became a mystery house and how we might get out. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61, 1-8.
10.
BluhmD. J.HarmanW.LeeT. W.MitchellT. R. (2011). Qualitative research in management: A decade of progress. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1866-1891.
11.
BrunssonN. (2003). Organized hypocrisy. In CzarniawskaB.SévonG. (Eds.), The northern lights: Organization theory in Scandinavia (pp. 201-223). Copenhagen, Denmark: Liber.
12.
ByronK.LaurenceG. A. (2015). Diplomas, photos, and tchotchkes as symbolic self-representations: Understanding employees’ individual use of symbols. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 298-323.
13.
CanalesJ. I. (2015). Sources of selection in strategy making. Journal of Management Studies, 52, 1-31.
14.
CanatoA.RavasiD.PhillipsN. (2013). Coerced practice implementation in cases of low cultural fit: Cultural change and practice adaptation during the implementation of Six Sigma at 3M. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1724-1753.
15.
CatinoM.PatriottaG. (2013). Learning from errors: Cognition, emotions and safety culture in the Italian Air Force. Organization Studies, 34, 437-467.
16.
CharmazK. (2003). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In HolsteinJ.GubriumJ. (Eds.), Inside interviewing (pp. 311-331). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
CollingwoodR. G. (1993.). The idea of history. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
18.
CostasJ.GreyC. (2014). The temporality of power and the power of temporality: Imaginary future selves in professional service firms. Organization Studies, 34, 909-937.
19.
CourpassonD.DanyF.CleggS. (2012). Resisters at work: Generating productive resistance in the workplace. Organization Science, 23, 801-819.
20.
CreedW. E. D.DejordyR.LokJ. (2010). Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1336-1364.
21.
CurrieG.FinnR.MartinG. (2010). Role transition and the interaction of relational and social identity: New nursing roles in the English NHS. Organization Studies, 31, 941-961.
22.
Da CostaA. D. S. M.Silva SaraivaL. A. (2012). Hegemonic discourses on entrepreneurship as an ideological mechanism for the reproduction of capital. Organization, 19, 587-614.
23.
DavisJ. P.EisenhardtK. M. (2011). Rotating leadership and collaborative innovation: Recombination processes in symbiotic relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56, 159-201.
24.
DielemanM.BoddewynJ. J. (2012). Using organization structure to buffer political ties in emerging markets: A case study. Organization Studies, 33, 71-95.
25.
DingwallR. (1997). Accounts, interviews and observations. In MillerG.DingwallR. (Eds.), Context and method in qualitative research (pp. 51-66). London, England: Sage.
26.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
27.
ElsbachK. D.FlynnF. J. (2013). Creative collaboration and the self-concept: A study of toy designers. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 515-544.
28.
FauchartE.GruberM. (2011). Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 935-957.
29.
FraherA. L.GabrielY. (2014). Dreaming of flying when grounded: Occupational identity and occupational fantasies of furloughed airline pilots. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 926-951.
30.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluence. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-217). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
HallJ.MatosS.SheehanL.SilvestreB. (2012). Entrepreneurship and innovation at the base of the pyramid: A recipe for inclusive growth or social exclusion?Journal of Management Studies, 49, 785-812.
32.
HallettT. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75, 52-74.
33.
HarringtonS.WarrenS.RaynerC. (2015). Human Resource Management practitioners responses to workplace bullying: Cycles of symbolic violence. Organization, 22, 368-389.
34.
HerzogH. (2005). On home turf: Interview location and its social meaning. Qualitative Sociology, 28, 25-47.
35.
HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. (2003). Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns. In HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. (Eds.), Inside interviewing (pp. 3-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (1997). Active interviewing. In SilvermanD. (Ed.), Qualitative research (pp. 63-79). London, England: Sage.
37.
HuberG. P.PowerD. J. (1985). Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 171-180.
38.
JackallR. (1988). Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39.
JarzabkowskiP.BalogunJ. (2009). The practice and process of delivering integration through strategic planning. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 1255-1288.
40.
JenkinsS.DelbridgeR. (2014). In pursuit of happiness: A sociological examination of employee identifications amongst a “happy” call-centre workforce. Organization, 21, 867-887.
41.
JickT. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
42.
KalonaityteV. (2010). The case of vanishing borders: Theorizing diversity management as internal border control. Organization, 17, 31-52.
43.
KatzD. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163-204.
44.
KhaireM. (2014). Fashioning an industry: Socio-cognitive processes in the construction of worth of a new industry. Organization Studies, 35, 41-74.
45.
KjærgaardA.MorsingM.RavasiD. (2011). Mediating identity: A study of media influence on organizational identity construction in a celebrity firm. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 514-543.
46.
KvaleS.BrinkmannS. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. London, England: Sage.
47.
LaurentA. (1978). Managerial subordinacy: A neglected aspect of organizational hierarchies. Academy of Management Review, 3, 220-230.
48.
LawrenceT. B.DoverG. (2015). Place and institutional work: Creating housing for the hard-to-house. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60, 371-410.
49.
LêJ. K. (2013). How constructions of the future shape organizational responses: Climate change and the Canadian oil sands. Organization, 20, 722-742.
50.
LepoutreJ. M. W. N.ValenteM. (2012). Fools breaking out: The role of symbolic and material immunity in explaining institutional nonconformity. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 285-313.
51.
MaurerI.EbersM. (2006). Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 262-292.
52.
MccrackenG. (1988). The long interview. London, England: Sage.
53.
MckennaS. (2011). A critical analysis of North American business leaders’ neocolonial discourse: Global fears and local consequences. Organization, 18, 387-406.
54.
MillsC. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55.
MitchellT. R.ThompsonL.PetersonE.CronkR. (1997). Temporal adjustments in the evaluation of events: The “rosy view.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 421-448.
56.
OakleyA. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In RobertsH. (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30-61). London, England: Routledge
57.
PetriglieriJ. L. (2015). Co-creating relationship repair: Pathways to reconstructing destabilized organizational identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60, 518-557.
58.
PotterJ.HepburnA. (2012). Eight challenges for interview researchers. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A.MarvastiA. B.MckinneyK. D. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (pp. 555-571). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59.
PotterJ.WetherellM. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London, England: Sage.
60.
RoulstonK. (2010). Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory and practice. London, England: Sage.
61.
SchaeferS. M. (2014). Managerial ignorance: A study of how managers organise for creativity. Lund, Sweden: Lund Business Press.
SinC. H. (2003). Interviewing in “place”: The socio-spatial construction of interview data. Area, 35, 305-312.
64.
SonensheinS. (2014). How organizations foster the creative use of resources. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 814-848.
65.
SveningssonS.AlvessonM. (2016). Managerial lives: Leadership and identity in an imperfect world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66.
SymonG.PritchardK. (2015). Performing the responsive and committed employee through the sociomaterial mangle of connection. Organization Studies, 36, 241-263.
67.
Van DijkS.BerendsH.JelinekM.RommeA. G. L.WeggemanM. (2011). Micro-institutional affordances and strategies of radical innovation. Organization Studies, 32, 1485-1513.
68.
WatsonT. J. (2011). Ethnography, reality, and truth: The vital need for studies of ‘how things work’ in organizations and management. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 202-217.
69.
WillmottH. (2011). Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship: Reactivity and the ABS list. Organization, 18, 429-442.
70.
Wray-BlissE. (2002). Abstract ethics, embodied ethics: The strange marriage of Foucault and positivism in labour process theory. Organization, 9, 5-39.
71.
ZottC.HuyQ. N. (2007). How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 70-105.
