The article argues for theorizing and studying the significance of how so-called leaders and followers converge or diverge in their views and understandings of the leadership/followership relations they may be part of. Divergence or misfits may be common yet missed by the researcher who takes only one party’s view of leadership into account and/or assumes that people involved define the relationship in a similar way. The article identifies and illustrates four typical forms of shared/diverse meanings regarding leadership: high-alignment leadership (shared meanings), value misfit (diverse assessment), construction misfit (different views of what goes on), and multiple breakdowns (high level of confusion of what goes on and how to assess it). Given variations in views of leadership, this article makes a case for considering “divergent relationalities”—in some opposition to common ideas about “smooth” leadership/followership relations based on convergent meanings.
AlvessonM.KärremanD. (2016). Intellectual failure and ideological success in leadership studies: the case of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25, 139-152.
5.
AlvessonM.SandbergJ. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 37, 247-271.
6.
AlvessonM.SveningssonS. (2003). The good visions, the bad micro-management and the ugly ambiguity: Contradictions of (non-)leadership in a knowledge-intensive company. Organization Studies, 24, 961-988.
7.
AlvessonM.SveningssonS. (2015). Changing organizational culture: Cultural change work in progress. London, England: Routledge.
8.
AntonakisJ.CiancioloA.SternbergR. J. (2004). Introduction. In AntonakisJ.CiancioloA.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 3-16). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
9.
BartoloméF.LaurentA. (1986, November-December). The manager: Master and servant of power. Harvard Business Review, pp. 77-81.
10.
BlighM. (2011). Followership and follower-centered approaches. In BrymanA.CollinsonD.GrintK.JacksonB.Uhl-BienM. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of leadership (pp. 425-436). London, England: Sage.
11.
BlomM.AlvessonM. (2014). Leadership on demand: Followers as initiators and inhibitors of managerial leadership. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30, 344-357.
12.
BresnenM. J. (1995). All things to all people? Perceptions, attributions, and constructions of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 495-513.
13.
BrymanA. (1996). Leadership in organizations. In CleggS. R.HardyC.LawrenceT. B.NordW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 276-292). London, England: Sage.
14.
BrymanA. (2011). Research methods in the study of leadership. In BrymanA.CollinsonD.GrintK.JacksonB.Uhl-BienM. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of leadership (pp. 15-28). London, England: Sage.
15.
BrymanA.LilleyS. (2009). Leadership researchers on leadership in higher education. Leadership, 5, 331-346.
16.
CarrollB.LevyL. (2008). Defaulting to management: Leadership defined by what it is not. Organization, 15, 75-96.
17.
CarrollB.LevyL.RichmondD. (2008). Leadership as practice. Challenging the competency paradigm. Leadership, 4, 363-379.
18.
CarstenM.Uhl-BienM.WestB. J.PateraJ. L.McGregorR. (2010). Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 543-562.
19.
CazaA.JacksonB. (2011). Authentic leadership. In BrymanA.CollinsonD.GrintK.JacksonB.Uhl-BienM. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of leadership (pp. 352-364). London, England: Sage.
20.
ChemersM. (2003). Leadership effectiveness: Functional, constructivist and empirical perspectives. In van KnippenbergD.HoggM. (Eds.), Leadership and power (pp. 5-17). London, England: Sage.
21.
CogliserC.SchriesheimC.ScanduraT.GardnerW. (2009). Balance in leader and follower perceptions of leader-member exchange: Relationships with performance and work attitudes. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 452-465.
22.
CollinsonD. (2005). Dialectics of leadership. Human Relations, 58, 1419-1442.
23.
CollinsonD. (2006). Rethinking followership: A post-structural analysis of follower identities. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 179-189.
24.
CollinsonD. (2012). Prozac leadership and the limits of positive thinking. Leadership, 8, 87-107.
25.
CollinsonD. (2014). Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: New directions for critical leadership studies?Leadership, 10, 36-55.
26.
CooperR.BurrellG. (1988). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: An introduction. Organization Studies, 9, 91-112.
27.
CunhaM.CunhaR.RegoA. (2009). Exploring the role of leader—Subordinate interactions in the construction of organizational positivity. Leadership, 5, 81-101.
28.
CunliffeA.EriksenM. (2011). Relational leadership. Human Relations, 64, 1425-1450.
29.
CurrieG.LockettA.SuhomlinovaO. (2009). The institutionalization of distributed leadership. A “catch 22” in English public services. Human Relations, 62, 1735-1761.
30.
DavisM. S. (1971). That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of Social Sciences, 1, 309-344.
31.
DeetzS. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
32.
Diaz-SaenzH. (2011). Transformational leadership. In BrymanA.CollinsonD.GrintK.JacksonB.Uhl-BienM. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of leadership (pp. 299-310). London, England: Sage.
33.
EinolaK. (2017). Teams that work. Making sense of successful global teams. Turku, Finland: Turku Business School.
34.
ErdoganB.BauerT. (2014). Leader-member exchange theory: The relational approach to leadership. In. DayD. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 407). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
FairhurstG. (2005). Reframing the art of the framing: Problems and prospects for leadership. Leadership, 1, 165-185.
FairhurstG. (2009). Considering the context in discursive leadership research. Human Relations, 62, 1607-1633.
38.
FairhurstG.ConnaughtonS. (2014). Leadership: A communicative perspective. Leadership, 10, 7-35.
39.
FairhurstG.Uhl-BienM. (2012). Organizational discourse analysis (ODA): Examining leadership as a relational process. Leadership Quarterly, 23, 1043-1062.
40.
FiedlerF. (1996). Research on leadership selection and training: One view of the future. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 241-250.
41.
FleenorJ. W.SmitherJ. W.AtwaterL. E.BraddyP. W.SturmR. E. (2010). Self–other rating agreement in leadership: A review. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1005-1034.
42.
FlemingP. (2005). Workers’ playtime? Boundaries and cynicism in a “culture of fun” program. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41, 285-303.
43.
FlemingP.MandariniM. (2009). Towards a workers’ society? New perspectives on work and emancipation. In AlvessonM.BridgmanT.WillmottH. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of critical management studies (pp. 328-344). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
FletcherJ. K. (2012). The relational practice of leadership. In Uhl-BienM.OspinaS. (Eds.), Advancing relational leadership (pp. 83-106). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
45.
FletcherJ. K.KäuferK. (2003). Shared leadership: Paradoxes and possibility. In PearceC. I.CongerJ. A. (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reforming the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 21-47). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
FordJ.HardingN. (2017). Followers in leadership theory: Fiction, fantasy and illusion. Leadership.
47.
GemmillG.OakleyJ. (1992). Leadership: An alienating social myth?Human Relations, 45, 113-129.
48.
GerstnerC.DayD. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory. Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 827-844.
49.
GrintK.JonesO. S.HoltC. (2017). What is leadership? In StoreyJ.HartleyJ.DenisJ-L.HartP.UlrichD. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to leadership (pp. 3-20). London, England: Routledge.
50.
GronnP. (1983). Talk as the work: The accomplishment of school administrations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 1-21.
51.
GronnP. (2002). Distributed Leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423-451.
52.
HoskingD. M. (2011). Moving relationality: Mediations on a relational approach to leadership In BrymanA.CollinsonD.GrintK.JacksonB.Uhl-BienM. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of leadership (pp. 455-467). London, England: Sage.
53.
HunterS. T.Bedell-AversK. E.MumfordM. D. (2007). The typical leadership study: Assumptions, implications, and potential remedies. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 435-446.
54.
JackallR. (1988). Moral mazes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
55.
JacksonB.ParryK. (2008). A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about studying leadership. London, England: SAGE.
56.
JermierJ.KerrS. (1997). “Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement”—Contextual recollections and current observations. Leadership Quarterly, 8, 95-100.
57.
KaiserR.CraigB. (2014). Destructive leadership in and of organizations. In DayD. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organization (pp. 260). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
58.
KüpersW.WeiblerJ. (2008). Inter-leadership: Why and how should we think of leadership and followership integrally?Leadership, 4, 443-475.
59.
LadkinD. (2010). Rethinking leadership: A new look at old leadership questions. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
60.
LaurentA. (1978). Managerial subordinancy: A neglected aspects of organizational hierarchy. Academy of Management Review, 3, 220-230.
61.
LearmonthM.MorrillK. (2017). Is critical leadership studies “critical”?Leadership.
62.
LindebaumD.CartwrightS. (2010). A critical examination of the relationship between emotional intelligence and transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1317-1341.
63.
LinsteadS.Grafton-SmallR. (1992). On reading organizational culture. Organization Studies, 13, 331-355.
MeindlJ. (1995). The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 329-341.
66.
MeyersonD.MartinJ. (1987). Cultural change: An integration of three different views. Journal of Management Studies, 24, 623-648.
67.
OspinaS.SorensonG. (2006). A constructionist lens on leadership: Charting new territory. In GoethalsG.SorensonG. (Eds.), The quest for a general theory of leadership (pp.188-204). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
68.
OspinaS.Uhl-BienM. (2012). Mapping the terrain. Convergence and divergence around relational leadership. In Uhl-BienM.OspinaS. (Eds.), Advancing relational leadership. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
69.
ParryK.BrymanA. (2006). Leadership in organizations. In CleggS. R.HardyC.LawrenceT. B.NordW. R. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies. London, England: Sage.
70.
PearceC.CongerJ. (Eds.). (2003). Shared leadership: Reforming the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71.
PotterJ.WetherellM. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London, England: Sage.
72.
RaelinJ. (2011). From leadership-as-practice to leaderful practice. Leadership, 7, 195-211.
73.
SandbergJ.TargamaA. (2007). Managing understanding in organizations. London, England: Sage.
74.
SandelandsL.DrazinR. (1989). On the language of organization theory. Organization Studies, 10, 457-458.
75.
SandjayaS.SarrosJ.SantoraJ. (2008). Defining and measuring servant leadership behaviour in organization. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 402-424.
76.
SashkinM. (2004). Transformational leadership: A review and synthesis. In AntonakisJ.CiancioloA. T.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 171-196). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
77.
SchaeferS. (2014). Managerial ignorance. Lund, Sweden: Lund Business Press.
78.
SeersA.ChopinS. (2012). The social production of leadership. In Uhl-BienM.OspinaS. (Eds.), Advancing relational leadership (pp. 43-82). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
79.
SeltzerJ.BassB. (1990). Transformational leadership: Beyond initiation and consideration. Journal of Management, 16, 693-703.
80.
SendjayaS.SarrosJ.SantoraJ. (2008). Defining and measuring servant leadership behaviour in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 45(2), 402-424.
81.
SmircichL. (1983). Organizations as shared meanings. In PondyL. R.FrostP. J.MorganG.DandridgeT. C. (Eds.), Organizational symbolism (pp. 55-69). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
82.
SmircichL.MorganG. (1982). Leadership: The management of meaning. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 18, 257-273.
83.
SpoelstraS.ten BosR. (2011). Leadership. In Painter-MorlandM.ten BosR. (Eds.), Business ethics and continental philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
84.
SveningssonS.AlvessonM. (2016). Managerial Lives. Leadership and Identity in an imperfect world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
85.
TourishD. (2014). Leadership, more or less? A processual, communication perspective on the role of agency in leadership theory. Leadership, 10, 79-98.
86.
Uhl-BienM. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social process of leadership and organizing. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 654-676.
87.
Uhl-BienM.CarstenM. (2017). Followership in context: A more nuanced understanding of followership in relation to leadership. In StoreyJ.HartleyJ.DenisJ-L.HartP.UlrichD. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to leadership (pp. 142-156). London, England: Routledge.
88.
Uhl-BienM.MarionR.McKelveyB. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 298-318.
89.
Uhl-BienM.OspinaS. (Eds.). (2012). Advancing relational leadership. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
90.
van BreukelenW.SchynsB.La BlancP. (2006). Leader-member exchange theory and research: Accomplishments and future challenges. Leadership, 2, 297-316.
91.
van KnippenbergD. L.StamD. (2014). Visionary leadership. In DayD. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and Organization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
92.
van KnippenbergD. L.SitkinS. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic-transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?The Academy of Management Annals, 7, 1-60.
93.
YuklG. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 285-305.
94.
YuklG. (2011). Contingency theories of effective leadership. In BrymanA.CollinsonD.GrintK.JacksonB.Uhl-BienM. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of leadership (pp. 286-298). London, England: Sage.
