This study investigates the use, by women, of New Age spirituality (NAS) language in the workplace. Quantitative and qualitative data collected in New Zealand and Israel show that women reported using NAS language more than men, and that NAS language are generally silenced. Results show that if not calculated correctly, women’s use of NAS can lead to the loss of social capital and cultural capital in the workplace. In addition, women use NAS language as a set of ideas that shape the way they behave, as a form of “power from within,” and as “spiritual capital.” The article draws out some implications for theory on language and power in the workplace, by showing that silenced languages may remain alive within people, directing responses and actions, and for feminist research, by suggesting that women’s spirituality should be considered as a factor in explaining the interpretation and negotiation of workplace challenges, by women.
AshforthB. E.PrattM. G. (2003). Institutionalized spirituality: An oxymoron? In GiacaloneR. A.JurkiewiczC. L. (Eds.), The handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance (pp. 93-107). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
2.
AshmosD.DuchonD. (2000). Spirituality at work: A conceptualization and measure. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9, 134-145.
3.
BarnettJ. (1985). A business model of enlightenment. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 57-63.
4.
BellE.TaylorS. (2003). The elevation of work: Pastoral power and the New Age work ethic. Organization, 10, 329-349.
5.
BellE.TaylorS. (2004). From inward bound to outward bound: The prophetic voices and discursive practices of spiritual management development. Human Relations, 57, 439-466.
6.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 241-258.
7.
CaseyC. (2000). Work, non-work and resacralizing self. Social Compass, 47, 4571-4587.
8.
EardleyS.BishopF. L.PrescottP.CardiniF.BrinkhausB.Santos-ReyK.LewithG. (2012). A systematic literature review of complementary and alternative medicine prevalence in EU. Forsch Komplementmed, 19(Suppl. 2), 18-28.
9.
FrassM.StrasslR. P.FriehsH.MullnerM.KundiM.KayeA. D. (2012). Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: A systematic review. The Ochsner Journal, 12, 45-56.
10.
GrantD.O’NeilK.StephensL. (2004). Spirituality in the workplace: New empirical directions in the study of the sacred. Sociology of Religion, 65, 265-283.
11.
HanegraaffW. J. (1998). New age religion and Western culture: Esotericism in the mirror of secular thought. New York: State University of New York Press.
12.
HedgesE.BeckfordJ. (2000). Holism, healing and the New Age. In SutcliffeN. S.BowmanM. (Eds.), Beyond New Age, exploring alternative spirituality (pp. 257-280). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
13.
HeelasP. (2012). On making some sense of spirituality. In HeelasP. (Ed.), Spirituality in the modern world. London, England: Routledge, 2-23.
14.
HeelasP.WoodheadL. (2005). The spiritual revolution: Why religion is giving way to spirituality. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
15.
HoustonM.KramaraeC. (1991). Speaking from silence: Methods of silencing and of resistance. Discourse & Society, 2, 387-399.
16.
HoutmanD.AupersS. (2007). The spiritual revolution and the new age gender puzzle: The sacralisation of the self in late modernity (1980–2000). Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46, 305-320.
17.
HoutmanD.MasciniP. (2002). Why do churches become empty while New Age grows? Secularization and religious changes in the Netherlands. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 455-473.
18.
HunterM. (2002). If you’re light you’re alright: Light skin color as social capital for women of color. Gender & Society, 16, 175-193.
19.
HuppatzK.GoodwinS. (2013). Masculinised jobs, feminised jobs and men’s “gender capital” experiences: Understanding occupational segregation in Australia. Journal of Sociology, 49, 291-308.
20.
KabeerN. (1994). Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development thought. London, England: Verso.
21.
KeshetY.SimchaiD. (2014). The “gender puzzle” of alternative medicine and holistic spirituality: A literature review. Social Science & Medicine, 113, 77-86.
22.
KissackH. (2010). Muted voices: A critical look at e-mail in organizations. Journal of European Industrial Training, 34, 539-551.
23.
KramschC. (1998). Language and culture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
Lips-WiersmaM.LundK.FornaciariD. C. (2009). Theorizing the dark side of the workplace spirituality movement. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18, 288-300.
25.
LiuC. H.RobertsonP. J. (2011). Spirituality in the workplace: Theory and measurement. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 35-50.
26.
McCallL. (1992). Does gender fit? Bourdieu, feminism, and the concepts of social order. Theory and Society, 21, 837-867.
27.
MumbyD. K. (1996). Feminism, postmodernism and organizational communication studies: A critical reading. Management Communication Quarterly, 9, 259-295.
28.
MumbyD. K.ClairR. P. (1997). Organizational discourse. In van DijkT. A (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 181-205). London, England: Sage.
29.
NissenN. (2011). Challenging perspectives: Women, complementary and alternative medicine, and social change. Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements, 3, 187-212.
30.
OzbilginM.TatliA. (2005). Understanding Bourdieu’s contribution to organisation and management studies. Academy of Management Review, 30, 855-877.
31.
RayM.MyersR. (1986). Creativity in business. New York, NY: Doubleday.
32.
Ross-SmithA.HuppatzK. (2010). Management, women and gender capital. Gender, Work & Organization, 17, 547-566.
33.
RowlandsJ. (1995). Empowerment examined. Development in Practice, 5, 101-107.
34.
RowlandsJ. (1997). Questioning empowerment: Working with women in Honduras. Oxford, UK: Oxfam.
35.
SkeggsB. (1997). Formations of class and gender: Becoming respectable. London, England: Sage.
36.
SointuE.WoodheadL. (2008). Spirituality, gender, and expressive selfhood. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47, 259-276.
37.
TaylorS. (2010). Gendering in the holistic milieu: A critical realist analysis of homeopathic work. Gender, Work & Organization, 17, 454-475.
38.
VaaraE.TienariJ.PiekkariR.SanttiR. (2005). Language and the circuits of power in a merging multinational corporation. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 595-623.
39.
VerterB. (2003). Spiritual capital: Theorizing religion with Bourdieu against Bourdieu. Sociological Theory, 21, 150-174.
40.
WongK. F. (2003). Empowerment as a panacea for poverty—Old wine in new bottles? Reflections on the World Bank’s conception of power. Progress in Development Studies, 3, 307-322.
41.
WoodheadL. (2007). Why so many women in holistic spirituality? A puzzle revisited. In FlanaganK.JuppP. C. (Eds.), A sociology of spirituality (pp. 115-126). Hampshire, UK: Kieran Flanagan and Peter C. Jupp.
42.
ZaidmanN. (2007). New Age products in local and global contexts: A comparison between Israel and New Zealand. Culture and Religion, 8, 255-270.
43.
ZaidmanN.Goldstein-GidoniO. (2011). Spirituality as a discarded form of organizational wisdom: Field based analysis. Group & Organization Management, 36, 630-653.
44.
ZaidmanN.Goldstein-GidoniO.NehemiaI. (2009). From temples to organizations: The introduction and packaging of spirituality. Organization, 16, 597-621.
