We explore the organizational characteristics of trade associations (TAs) and suggest theoretical approaches for undertaking research into or involving TAs in management and organization studies. Through emphasizing the role of TAs within and between industries and at the interface of business and society, we consider how TAs generate meaning and influence.
AldrichH. E.FiolC. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, 645-670.
2.
AldrichH. E.StaberU. H. (1988). Organizing business interests: Patterns of trade association foundings, transformations, and deaths. In CarrollG. R. (Ed.), Ecological analysis of organization (pp. 111-126). New York: Ballinger.
3.
AldrichH. E.StaberU. H.BeggsJ. J.ZimmerC. (1990). Minimalism and organizational mortality: Patterns of disbandings among American Trade Associations in the 20th Century. In SinghJ. V. (Ed.), Organizational evolution (pp. 21-52). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
BarnettM. L. (2006). Finding a working balance between competitive and communal strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1753-1773.
5.
BarnettM. L. (2013). One voice, but whose voice? Exploring what drives trade association activity. Business and Society, 52, 213-244.
BarnettW. P.MischkeG. A.OcasioW. (2000). The evolution of collective strategies among organizations. Organization Studies, 21, 325-354.
8.
DropeJ. M.HansenW. L. (2009). New evidence for the theory of groups: Trade association lobbying in Washington, DC. Political Research Quarterly, 62, 303-316.
9.
EdwardsB.McCarthyJ. D. (2004). Resources and social movement mobilization. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 116-152). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
10.
ElsbachK. D. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 57-88.
11.
GulatiR.PuranamP.TushmanM. (2012). Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 571-586.
12.
HelfatC. E.PeterafM. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 997-1010.
13.
KahlS. J. (2014). Associations, jurisdictional battles, and the development of dual-purpose capabilities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28, 381-394.
14.
KingA. A.LenoxM. J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 698-716.
15.
KirbyA. J. (1988). Trade associations as information exchange mechanisms. The RAND Journal of Economics, 19, 138-146.
16.
LawtonT. C.DohJ. P.RajwaniT. (2014). Aligning for advantage: Competitive strategies for the political and social arenas. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
LawtonT. C.RajwaniT.DohJ. (2013). The antecedents of political capabilities: A study of ownership, cross-border activity and organization at legacy airlines in a deregulatory context. International Business Review, 22, 228-242.
18.
LeibleinM. J. (2011). What do resource- and capability-based theories propose?Journal of Management, 37, 909-932.
19.
MayT.McHughJ.TaylorT. (1998). Business representation in the UK since 1979: The case of trade associations. Political Studies, 46, 260-275.
20.
McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241.
21.
MintoA. M. (2016). Non market autonomy: Combining private and collective approaches to corporate political activity. Doctoral dissertation, Eugene, Oregon: University of Oregon.
22.
MitnickB. M.RyanR. C. (2015). On making meanings: Curators, social assembly, and mashups. Strategic Organization, 13, 141-152. doi:10.1177/1476127015580310
23.
RajwaniT.LawtonT.PhillipsN. (2015). The “voice of industry”: Why management researchers should pay more attention to trade associations. Strategic Organization, 13, 224-232.
24.
ReveleyJ.VilleS. (2010). Enhancing industry association theory: A comparative business history contribution. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 837-858.
25.
SchaeferA.KerriganF. (2008). Trade associations and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from the UK water and film industries. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17, 171-195.
26.
SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH. (Eds.). (2008). The Blackwell companion to social movements. New York, NY: John Wiley.
27.
SpillmanL. (2012). Solidarity in strategy: Making business meaningful in American trade associations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
SpillmanL.StrandM. (2013). Interest-oriented action. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 85-104.
29.
StaberU.AldrichH. E. (1983). Trade association stability and public policy. In HallR.QuinnR. (Eds.), Organization theory and public policy (pp. 163-178). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
30.
TeeceD. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319-1350.
