AguinisH.VandenbergR. J. (2014). An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure: Improving research quality before data collection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 569-595.
2.
AlvessonM.SandbergJ. (2013). Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 128-152.
3.
AshforthB. E. (2005). Becoming vanilla pudding: How we undermine our passion for research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 400-403.
4.
BedeianA. G. (1996). Thoughts on making and remaking the management discipline. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5, 311-318.
5.
BeyerJ. (1992). Researchers are not cats: They can survive and succeed by being curious. In FrostP. J.StableinR. E. (Eds.), Doing exemplary research (pp. 65-72). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
BoalK. B.TrankC. Q. (2011). The journal of management inquiry at 20: Still crazy after all these years. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 343-348.
7.
BusheG. R. (2013). Dialogic OD: Toward a theory of practice. OD Practitioner, 45, 11-17.
8.
De RondM.MillerA. N. (2005). Publish or perish: Bane or boon of academic life?Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 321-329.
9.
GergenK. J. (1978). Toward generative theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1344-1360.
10.
HambrickD. C. (1994). 1993 presidential address: What if the academy actually mattered?Academy of Management Review, 19, 11-16.
11.
HambrickD. C. (2007). The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing?Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1346-1352.
12.
HannahD. R.PeredoA. M. (2011). Rethinking management education and scholarship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 178-179.
13.
HiningsC. R.GreenwoodR. (2002). Disconnects and consequences in organization theory?Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 411-421.
14.
LewinK. (1945). The research center for group dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Sociometry, 8, 126-136.
15.
LikertR. (1947). Kurt Lewin: A pioneer in human relations research. Human Relations, 1, 131-139.
16.
LouisM. R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226-251.
17.
MacdonaldS. (2014). Emperor’s new clothes: The reinvention of peer review as myth. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 264-279.
18.
MuchinskyP. M. (1996). A new section of the journal of organizational behavior: “The Incubator.”Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 3-4.
19.
NordW. R.ConnellA. F. (2011). Rethinking the knowledge controversy in organization studies: A generative uncertainty perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
OliverC. (2010). The goals of scholarship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 26-32.
21.
PfefferJ. (2005). Why do bad management theories persist? A comment to Ghosal. Academy of Management Learning, 4, 96-100.
22.
StackmanR. W.PhillipsN. (2016). Editors’ comment. Journal of Management, 25, 119-121.
23.
StarbuckW. H. (2003). Turning lemons into lemonade: Where is the value in peer reviews?Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 341-351.
24.
van AkenJ. E.RommeG. (2009). Reinventing the future: Adding design science to the repertoire of organization and management studies. Organization Management Journal, 6, 5-12.
25.
WeickK. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628-652.
26.
WeickK. E. (1999). Theory construction as disciplined reflexivity: Tradeoffs in the 90s. Academy of Management Review, 24, 797-808.
27.
WeickK. E. (2007). The generative properties of richness. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 14-19.
28.
WrightT. A. (2003). The “Incubator” is alive and well at the journal of organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 433-435.
29.
WrightT. A. (2013). The “Incubation” of high-impact ideas: Past directions and future perspectives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 427-430.