Assessing Candidate Quality

Abstract

This essay examines how we as academics assess the quality of our colleagues through the lens of how we hire them. I begin by reviewing some critiques that have arisen regarding the use of largely quantitative critieria for assessment, and suggest that we might learn something about assessing quality by viewing it as a cultural issue. Building on insights from ethnograpy, I then offer some suggestions for how to build upon, and hopefully improve, our current practices.

Keywords

quality hiring ethnography

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguinis

Shapiro

Antonacopoulou

Cummings

(2014). Scholarly impact: A pluralist conceptualization. Academy of Management, Learning & Education, 13, 623-639.

Baum

(2012). The skewed few: Does “skew” signal quality among journals, articles, and academics? Journal of Management Inquiry, 21, 349-354.

Callaway

(2011). Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities. Nature, 479, 15.

Davis

(2014). Editorial essay: Why do we still have journals? Administrative Science Quarterly, 59, 193-201.

Ferguson

(2012, July 12). Can we trust psychological research? Time.com. Retrieved from http://ideas.time.com/2012/07/17/can-we-trust-psychological-research/print/

Macdonald

Kam

(2011). The skewed few: People and papers of quality in management studies. Organization, 18, 467-475.

Markus

(2013, March 20). Caught cheating: Colleges falsify admissions data for higher rankings. NBCnews.com. Retrieved from http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/20/17376664-caught-cheating-colleges-falsify-admissions-data-for-higher-rankings

Nuzzo

(2014). Statistical errors. Nature, 506, 150-152.

Tushman

(2009). Wannabe U: Inside the corporate university. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

10.

Walsh

(2011). 2010 Presidential address: Embracing the sacred in our secular scholarly world. Academy of Management Review, 36, 215-234.