Using creative writing to interpret phenomenological interviews, I examined the work lives of two disabled people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Stories were created from decades of my disability research experience, my personal work experiences with disability, examination of phenomenological interview transcripts of workers with MS, and by returning to the seminal ideas on dirty work by Hughes. I wanted to consider, in a new way, some of the challenges disabled people with MS might face at work. Stories are shared that reflect feelings of being a “dirty” worker, not because of the work that was done but because of having MS.
AshforthB. E.KreinerG. E. (1999). “How can you do it?” Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity. The Academy of Management Review, 24, 413-434.
2.
Australian Institute of Health & Welfare. (2010). Australia’s health 2010 (Cat. no. AUS 122). Canberra, ACT, Australia.
3.
BaranB. E.RogelbergS. G.LopinaE. C.AllenJ. A.SpitzmullerC.BergmanM. (2012). Shouldering a silent burden: The toll of dirty tasks. Human Relations, 65, 597-626. doi:10.1177/0018726712438063
4.
BarnesC. (1999). Disability and paid employment. Work, Employment and Society, 13, 147-149.
BarnesC.MercerG. (2005). Disability, work, and welfare: Challenging the social exclusion of disabled people. Work, Employment and Society, 19, 527-545.
7.
BenjaminO.BernsteinD.Motzafi-HallerP. (2010). Emotional politics in cleaning work: The case of Israel. Human Relations, 64, 337-357.
8.
CooleyD. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
9.
DaneE. (2011). Changing the tune of academic writing: Muting cognitive entrenchment. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 332-336.
10.
DenzinN. K. (1994). The art and politics of interpretation. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 500-515). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
DomorackiM. D.KellerL. F.SpicerM. W. (2011). Public administration and fiction: Kicking the hornet’s nest of administrative ambiguity. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 31, 610-615.
12.
FreemanM. (2004). Data are everywhere: Narrative criticism in the literature of experience. In DaiuteC.LightfootC. (Eds.), Narrative analysis: Studying the development of individuals in society (pp. 63-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
GioiaD. A. (2004). A renaissance self: Prompting personal and professional revitalization. In StableinR. E.FrostP. J. (Eds.), Renewing research practice (pp. 97-114). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. London, England: Allen Lane, The Penguin Press.
15.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
16.
GoodinR. E. (2000). Democratic deliberation within. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 29, 81-109.
17.
GrandyG.MavinS. (2012). Occupational image, organizational image and identity in dirty work: Intersections of organizational efforts and media accounts. Organization, 19, 765-786. doi:10.1177/1350508411422582
18.
GreenA. I. (2011). Playing the (sexual)field: The interactional basis of systems of sexual stratification. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74, 244-266.
19.
HannahD. R.LautschB. A. (2011). Counting in qualitative research: Why to conduct it, when to avoid it, and when to closet it. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 14-22.
20.
HansenH.BarryD.BojeD. M.HatchM. J. (2007). Truth or consequences: An improvised collective story construction. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16, 112-126.
21.
HaroldJ. (2003). Flexing the imagination. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 61, 247-257.
22.
HaywardR. M.TuckeyM. R. (2011). Emotions in uniform: How nurses regulate emotion at work via emotional boundaries. Human Relations, 64, 1501-1523.
23.
HernandezB.McDonaldK.DivilbissM.HorinE.VelcoffJ.DonosoO. (2008). Reflections on the disabled workforce: Focus groups with healthcare, hospitality, and retail administrators. Employee Rights and Responsibilities Journal, 20, 157-164.
24.
HoodB. (2012). Why there is no “you” inside your head. London, England: Constable.
25.
HughesE. C. (1951). Work and the self. In RohrerJ. H.SherifM. (Eds.), Social psychology at the crossroads (pp. 313-323). New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
26.
HughesE. C. (1958). Men and their work. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Greenwood Press.
27.
HughesE. C. (1962). Good people and dirty work. Social Problems, 10, 3-11.
28.
HughesE. C. (1970). The humble and the proud: The comparative study of occupations. Sociological Quarterly, 11, 147-156.
29.
HummelR. P. (1991). Stories managers tell: Why they are as valid as science. Public Administration Review, 51, 31-41.
30.
HydeM. (1996). Fifty years of failure: Employment services for disabled people in the UK. Work, Employment & Society, 10, 683-700.
31.
KesslerI.HeronP.DopsonS. (2012). Opening the window: Managing death in the workplace. Human Relations, 65, 291-312. doi:10.1177/0018726711430002
32.
KreinerG. E.AshforthB. E.SlussD. M. (2006). Identity dynamics in occupational dirty work: Integrating social identity and system justification perspectives. Organization Science, 17, 619-636.
33.
MacLeanT.AntebyM.HudsonB.RudolphJ. W. (2006). Talking tainted topics: Insights and ideas on researching socially disapproved organizational behavior. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 59-68.
34.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133-163.
35.
McCurdyH. E. (1973). Fiction phenomenology, and public administration. Public Administration Review, 33, 52-60.
36.
McCurdyH. E. (1995). Fiction and imagination: How they affect public administration. Public Administration Review, 55, 499-506.
37.
MillerB.PaolaS. (2005). Tell it slant: Writing and shaping creative non-fiction. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
38.
NeumanW. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Sydney, Australia: Allyn & Bacon.
39.
OliverM. (1983). Social work with disabled people. Basingstoke, UK: MacMillan.
40.
OrwellG. (1958). Why I write. In BottG. (Ed.), George Orwell: Selected writings (pp. 99-105). London, England: Heinemann Educational Books.
41.
PhillipsN. (1995). Telling organizational tales: On the role of narrative fiction in the study of organizations. Organization Studies, 16, 625-649.
42.
ReddyV. (2007). Getting back to the rough ground: Deception and “social living.”Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 362, 621-637.
43.
RolfeG. (2002). “A lie that helps us see the truth”: Research, truth and fiction in the helping professions. Reflective Practice, 3, 89-102.
44.
RoorbachB. (2008). Writing life stories: How to make memories into memoirs, ideas into essays, and life into literature. Cincinnati, OH: Writer’s Digest Books.
45.
RowlandG.RowlandS.WinterR. (1990). Writing fiction as inquiry into professional practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22, 291-293.
46.
SantakosS. (1993). Social research. South Melbourne: MacMillan Education Australia.
47.
ScheffT. J. (1988). Shame and conformity: The deference-emotion system. American Sociological Review, 53, 395-406.
48.
ShafferL. S. (2005). From mirror self-recognition to the looking-glass self: Exploring the justification hypothesis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 47-65.
49.
ShawI. (2004). Doctors, “dirty work” patients, and “revolving doors.”Qualitative Health Research, 14, 1032-1045.
50.
StakeR. E. (2000). Case studies. In DenzinN.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435-454). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
51.
StakeR. E. (2003). Case studies. In DenzinN.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 134-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
52.
StannardC. I. (1973). Old folks and dirty work: The social conditions for patient abuse in a nursing home. Social Problems, 20, 329-342.
53.
TracyS. J.ScottC. (2006). Sexuality, masculinity, and taint management among firefighters and correctional officers: Getting down and dirty with “America’s heroes” and the “scum of law enforcement.”Management Communication Quarterly, 20, 6-38.
54.
TylerM. (2011). Tainted love: From dirty work to abject labour in Soho’s sex shops. Human Relations, 64, 1477-1500.
55.
VickersM. H. (2010). The creation of fiction to share other truths and different viewpoints: A creative journey and an interpretive process. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 556-571.
56.
VickersM. H. (2011). Taking a compassionate turn for workers with multiple sclerosis (MS): Towards the facilitation of management learning. Management Learning, 42, 1-17.
57.
VickersM. H. (2013). Three stories—And a writer’s tale: A creative writing case study of workplace bullying. Organization Management Journal, 10, 139-147.
58.
VickersM. H. (2014-a). Workplace bullying as workplace corruption: A higher education, creative nonfiction case study. Administration & Society, 46, 960-985.
59.
VickersM. H. (2014-b). Dark times for workers with disability: Shame experiences for workers with Multiple Sclerosis (MS)–A creative non-fiction, collective case study [Special issue: The Politics of Fear in Dark Times: Visions of Democracy, Freedom, and Open Society]. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 17, 89.
60.
WhitemanG. (2004). Why are we talking inside? Reflecting on Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) and management research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 13, 261-277.
61.
WhitemanG. (2010). Management studies that break your heart. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 328-337.
62.
ZikmundW. G. (2003). Business research methods (7th ed.). Mason, MI: Thomson, South-Western.
