Studies of organization stigma have become increasing prominent. Yet these studies are not uncontroversial; structural barriers to the study of organization stigma still exist within the profession. We argue for the study of stigma, highlighting its importance. We then explain how structural barriers threaten the study of organization stigma by imposing inappropriate boundaries on scholarly inquiry, and by threatening the validity of the findings derived from such studies. We also outline the sources and consequences of the structural barriers that impose these obstacles. We end by suggesting ways that such studies can be reframed in an effort to overcome or lessen the taboo nature of the stigma studies.
AlexanderJ. C. (2004). Rethinking strangeness: From structures in space to discourses in civil society. Thesis Eleven, 79, 87-104.
2.
AlvessonM.WillmottH. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 619-644.
3.
AntebyM.2010. Markets, morals, and practices of trade: Jurisdictional disputes in the U.S. commerce in cadavers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 606-638.
4.
AntebyM. (2013). Relaxing the taboo on telling our own stories: Upholding professional distance and personal involvement. Organization Science, 24, 1277-1290.
5.
AshforthB. E.KreinerG. E. (1999). How can you do it?: Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity. Academy of Management Review, 24, 413-435.
6.
AstleyW. G. (1985). Administrative science as socially constructed truth. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 497-513.
7.
BarryD.ElmesM. (1997). Strategy retold: Toward a narrative view of strategic discourse. Academy of Management Review, 22, 429-452.
8.
BedeianA. G. (1997). Of fiction and fraud: A comment on Barry and Elmes’ article. Academy of Management Review, 22, 840-843.
9.
BedeianA. G. (2003). The manuscript review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 331-338.
10.
BedeianA. G. (2004). Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3, 198-217.
11.
BedeianA. G. (2008). Balancing authorial voice and editorial omniscience: The “it’s my paper and I’ll say what I want to” versus “ghostwriters in the sky” minuet. In BaruchY.KonradA.AguinisH.StarbuckW. H. (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship (pp. 134-142). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
BitektineA. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36, 151-179.
13.
BourdieuP. (1977). Ouline of a theory of practice (Vol. 16, R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1972)
14.
BrewisJ. (2005). Signing my life away? Researching sex and organization. Organization, 12, 493-510.
15.
BurrellG. (1984). Sex and organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 5, 97-118.
16.
ChiaR. (1996). The problem of reflexivity in organizational research: Towards a postmodern science of organization. Organization, 3, 31-59.
17.
CreedW. E. D.HudsonB. A.OkhuysenG. A.Smith-CroweK. (2014). Swimming in a sea of shame: Incorporating emotion into explanations of institutional reproduction and change. Academy of Management Review. doi: 10.5465/amr.2012.0074.
18.
DeephouseD. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate?Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1024-1039.
19.
DeephouseD. L.SuchmanM. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49-77). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
20.
DeJordyR. (2008). Just passing through: Stigma, passing, and identity decoupling in the work place. Group & Organization Management, 33, 504-531.
21.
DeversC. E.DewettT.MishinaY.BelsitoC. A. (2009). A general theory of organizational stigma. Organization Science, 20, 154-171.
22.
DewhurstS.FitzPatrickL. (2007). How to build your personal networks. Strategic Communication Management, 11, 14.
23.
DukerichJ. M.KramerR.McLean-ParksJ. (1998). The dark side of organizational identification. In WhettenD. A.GodfreyP. C. (Eds.), Identity in organizations (pp. 245-256). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24.
DunnM. B.JonesC. (2010). Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967-2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 114-149.
25.
DuttonJ. E.DukerichJ. M.HarquailC. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.
26.
ElsbachK. D. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 57-88.
27.
ElsbachK. D. (2004). Interpreting workplace identities: The role of office décor. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 99-129.
28.
ElsbachK. D.SuttonR. I. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 699-738.
29.
FlemingJ. H.DarleyJ. M.HiltonJ. L.KojetinB. A. (1990). Multiple audience problem: A strategic communication perspective on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 593-609.
30.
FriedlandR. R. (2002). Money, sex, and god: The erotic logic of religious nationalism. Sociological Theory, 20, 381-425.
31.
FriedlandR. R.AlfordR. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In PowellW.DiMaggioP. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232-267). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
GeertzC. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In GeertzC. (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3-32). New York, NY: Basic Books.
33.
GinzelL. E.KramerR. M.SuttonR. I. (1992). Organizational impression management as a reciprocal influence process: The neglected role of the organizational audience. Research in Organizational Behavior, 15, 227-267.
34.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35.
GouldnerA. W. (1962). Anti-minotaur: The myth of a value-free sociology. Social Problems, 9, 199-213.
36.
GreveH. R.PalmerD.PoznerJ.-E. (2010). Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 53-107.
37.
GriffinR. W.O’Leary-KellyA. (Eds.). (2004). The dark side of organizational behavior. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
38.
HardyC.CleggS. (1997). Relativity without relativism: Reflexivity in post-paradigm organization studies. British Journal of Management, 8, 5-17.
39.
HardyC.CleggS. (2006). Some dare call it power. In CleggS.HardyC.LawrenceT.NordW. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 754-776). London, England: SAGE.
40.
HardyC.PhillipsN. (1998). Strategies of engagement: Lessons from the critical examination of collaboration and conflict in an interorganizational domain. Organization Science, 9, 217-230.
41.
HardyC.PhillipsN.CleggS. (2001). Reflexivity in organization and management theory: A study of the production of the research “subject.”Human Relations, 54, 531-560.
42.
HerekG. M. (1998). Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
43.
HillmanA. (2009). Editor’s comments. Academy of Management Review, 34, 7-10.
44.
HochschildA. R. (1983). The managed heart: The commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
HollandR. (1999). Reflexivity. Human Relations, 52, 463-484.
46.
HudsonB. A. (2008). Against all odds: A consideration of core-stigmatized organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33, 252-266.
47.
HudsonB. A.OkhuysenG. A. (2009). Not with a ten-foot pole: Core stigma, stigma transfer, and improbable persistence of men’s bathhouses. Organization Science, 20, 134-153.
48.
JonesC.MaoretM.MassaF. G.SvejenovaS. (2012). Rebels with a cause: Creation, contestation, and expansion of the de novo category “modern architecture,” 1900-1975. Organization Science. Advance online publication, 23, 1523-1545.
49.
KeithA.BurridgeK. (1991). Euphemism and dysphemism: Language used as shield and weapon. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
KingA. B.FineG. A. (2000). Ford on the line: Business leader reputation and the multiple-audience problem. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9, 71-86.
51.
KraatzM. S.BlockE. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243-275). London, England: SAGE.
52.
KreinerG. E.AshforthB. E.SlussD. M. (2006). Identity dynamics in occupational dirty work: Integrating social identity and system justification perspectives. Organization Science, 17, 619-636.
53.
KrysanM.BaderM. (2009). Racial blind spots: Black-White-Latino differences in community knowledge. Social Problems, 56, 677-701.
54.
LawrenceT. B. (2008). Power, institutions and organizations. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 170-197). London, England: SAGE.
55.
LawrenceT. B.WinnM. I.JenningsP. D. (2001). The temporal dynamics of institutionalization. Academy of Management Review, 26, 624-644.
56.
MacLeanT.AntebyM.HudsonB. A.RudolphJ. W. (2006). Talking tainted topics: Insights and ideas on researching socially disapproved organizational behavior. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 59-68.
57.
MacLeanT.BehnamM. (2010). Organizations: The dangers of decoupling: The relationship between compliance programs, legitimacy perceptions, and institutionalized misconduct. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1499-1520.
58.
MarquisC.LounsburyM. (2007). Vive la resistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of U.S. Community banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 799-820.
59.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
60.
MertonR. K. (1973). The normative structure of science. In MertonR. K. (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 267-280). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1942)
61.
MeyerR. E. (2008). New sociology of knowledge: Historical legacy and contributions to current debates in institutional research. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 519-538). Los Angeles, CA: London.
62.
MeyerR. E.HammerschmidG. (2006). Changing institutional logics and executive identities: A managerial challenge to public administration in Austria. The American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 1000-1014.
63.
MinerJ. B. (2003). Commentary on Arthur Bedeian’s “the manuscript review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors.”Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 339-343.
64.
MobergD. J. (2006). Ethics blind spots in organizations: How systematic errors in person perception undermine moral agency. Organization Studies, 27, 413-428.
65.
NgD.WestgrenR.SonkaS. (2009). Competitive blind spots in an institutional field. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 349-369.
66.
NordW. R. (1980). Comparison and extensions on Frost’s and Weick’s analyses of blind spots. Group & Organization Management, 5, 189-197.
67.
O’DohertyD.De CockC.RehnA.Lee AshcraftK. (2011). New sites/sights: Exploring the white spaces of organization. Organization Studies, 32, 313-315.
68.
PaetzoldR. L.DipboyeR. L.ElsbachK. D. (2008). A new look at stigmatization in and of organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33, 186-193.
69.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
70.
PorterM. (2001). Strategy and the internet. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 63-78.
71.
PrattM. G.RafaeliA. (1997). Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 862-898.
72.
ReayT.HiningsC. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30, 629-652.
73.
SchlosserE. (2003). Reefer madness: Sex, drugs, and cheap labor in the American Black market. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
74.
SchneibergM.ClemensE. S. (2006). The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis. Sociological Theory, 24, 195-227.
75.
ScottW. R. (2007). Institutions and organizations (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
76.
SeoM.-G.CreedW. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 222-247.
77.
SimmelG. (1921). The sociological significance of the “stranger.” In ParkR.BurgerE. (Eds.), Introduction to the science of sociology (pp. 322-327). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
78.
StinchcombeA. L. (1997). On the virtues of the old institutionalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 1-18.
79.
StraussA. C.CorbinJ. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.): Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
80.
StrykerR. (2000). Legitimacy processes as institutional politics: Implications for theory and research in the sociology of organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 17, 179-223.
81.
SuchmanM. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610.
82.
SuttonR. I.CallahanA. L. (1987). The stigma of bankruptcy: Spoiled organizational image and its management. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 405-436.
83.
VaughanD. (1999). The dark side of organizations: Mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 271-305.
84.
WarrenD. E. (2007). Corporate scandals and spoiled identities: How organizations shift stigma to employees. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17, 477-498.
85.
WeickK. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
86.
WeickK. E. (1980). Blind spots in organizational theorizing. Group & Organization Management, 5, 178-188.
87.
ZajacE. J.BazermanM. H. (1991). Blind spots in industry and competitor analysis: Implications of interfirm (mis)perceptions for strategic decisions. Academy of Management Review, 16, 37-56.
88.
ZilberT. B. (2002). Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 234-254.
89.
ZuckermanE. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1398-1438.
