The very existence of workplace spirituality (WPS) is based on distinct assumptions about what it is to be human. However, to date, WPS has largely ignored ontological and epistemological roots that underpin how we theorize the person in management. This leaves WPS without a sound and distinct theoretical base. To address this important lacuna, we argue for a turn to existentialism, which, with its focus on the essence of the self, offers the opportunity to address this lacuna. We base our arguments on the analysis of a grounded theory study of spiritual retreats in a tertiary education institute in which participants attempted to (re)gain a sense of self. After analyzing the results through contrasting positive and critical approaches to WPS, we make our case for an existential approach to workplace spirituality.
AktoufO.HoflordW. D. (2009). The implications of humanism for business studies. In SpitzechH.PrisonM.AmannW.KhanS.von KimakowitzE. (Eds.), Humanism in business. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AlgeraP. M.Lips-WiersmaM. (2012). Radical authentic leadership: Co-creating the conditions under which all members of the organization can be authentic. Leadership Quarterly, 23, 118-131.
3.
AlthusserL. (1969). For Marx (BrewsterB., Trans.). London: Penguin Press. (Original work published 1965)
4.
AshmosD. P.DuchonD. (2000). Spirituality at work: A conceptualisation and measure. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9, 134-145.
5.
BellE.TaylorS. (2004). The elevation of work: Pastoral power and the new age work ethic. Human Relations, 57, 439-466.
6.
BestS.KellnerD. (1991). Postmodern theory. Critical interrogations. New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
7.
BowieN. E. (1998). A Kantian theory of meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1083-1092.
8.
BriskinA. (1998). The stirring of the soul in the workplace. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
9.
BurrellG.MorganG. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London, England: Heinemann.
10.
ChristensenT.LaegreidP. (2001). A transformative perspective on administrative reforms. In ChristensenT.LaegreidP. (Eds.), New public management: The transformation of ideas and practice. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
11.
CooperD. E. (1990). Existentialism: A reconstruction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
12.
CostasJ.FlemingP. (2009). Beyond dis-identification: A discursive approach to self-alienation in contemporary organizations. Human Relations, 62, 353-378.
13.
CunliffeA. L.JunJ. S. (2005). The need for reflexivity in public administration. Administration & Society, 37, 225-242.
14.
deKlerkJ. J. (2005). Spirituality, meaning in life, and work wellness: A research agenda. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 13, 64-88.
15.
DriscollC.WiebeE. (2007). Technical spirituality at work: Jacques Ellul on workplace spirituality. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16, 334-348.
16.
DriverM. (2005). From empty speech to full speech? Reconceptualizing spirituality in organizations based on a psychoanalytically-grounded understanding of the self. Human Relations, 58, 1091-1110.
17.
ErmarthE. D. (2007). The closed space of choice. A manifesto on the future of history. In JenkinsK.MorganS.MunslowA. (Eds.), Manifestos for history (pp. 50-66). London, England: Routledge.
18.
FerlieE.AshburnerL.FitzgeraldL.PettigrewA. (1996). The new public management in action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
FoucaultM. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
20.
FournierV.GreyC. (2000). At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Human Relations, 53, 7-33.
21.
FranklV. E. (1984). Man’s search for meaning. New York, NY: Touchstone.
22.
GiacaloneR. A.JurkiewiczC. (2003). Toward a science of workplace spirituality. In GiacaloneR. A.JurkiewiczC. (Eds.), Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance (pp. 3-28). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
23.
GlaserB. G. (2003). The grounded theory perspective II: Description’s remodelling of grounded theory methodology. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
24.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine.
GullG. A.DohJ. (2004). The “transmutation” of the organization. Toward a more spiritual workplace. Journal of Management Inquiry, 13, 128-139.
27.
HeideggerM. (1962). Sein und Zeit [Being and time] (MacquarrieJ.RobinsonE., Trans.). London, England: SCM Press.
28.
HolfordW. D.SaivesA.-L. (2013). The future (and the now) according to Jacques Ellul: Deterministic or mindful?Futures, 47, 9-16.
29.
Holmer NadesanM. (1999). The discourses of corporate spiritualism and evangelical capitalism. Management Communication Quarterly, 13, 3-42.
30.
JonesR.NobleG. (2007). Grounded theory and management research: A lack of integrity?Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 2, 84-103.
31.
KellyJ.KellyL. (1998). An existential-systems approach to managing organizations. Westport, CN: Quorum books.
32.
KickertW. (1995). Steering at a distance: A new paradigm of public governance in Dutch higher education. Governance, 8, 135-158.
33.
LawlerJ. (2005). The essence of leadership? Existentialism and leadership. Leadership, 1, 215-231.
34.
LecoureJ. S.MillsA. J. (2008). Dialogical aspects of the technologies of the self in organizational analysis. Tamara: Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science, 7, 6-19.
35.
LevyN. (2001). Being up-to-date: Foucault, Sartre, and postmodernity. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
Lips-WiersmaM. S. (2003). Making conscious choices in doing research on workplace spirituality: Utilizing the “holistic development model” to articulate values, assumptions and dogmas of the knower. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16, 406-425.
38.
Lips-WiersmaM. S. (2006). The role of spirituality in higher education. The necessity for, and difficulties with, reflection on lasting values in a new public management context. Public Administration and Development, 26, 123-133.
39.
Lips-WiersmaM. S.Lund DeanK.FornaciariC. (2009). Theorizing the dark side of the workplace spirituality movement. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18, 288-300.
40.
LockeK. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. London, England: Sage.
41.
Lund DeanK.FornaciariC.McGeeJ. (2003). Research in spirituality, religion and work. Walking the line between relevance and legitimacy. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16, 378-395.
42.
MacmillanS.MillsA. J. (November7-9, 2002). Existentialism, the individual, and management theory: Some preliminary thoughts. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Atlantic Schools of Business Conference (pp. 153-161). Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada: St. Francis Xavier University.
43.
MacMillanS.YueA. R.MillsA. J. (2012). Both how and why: Considering existentialism as a philosophy of work and management. Philosophy of Management, 11, 27-46.
44.
MaslowA. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
45.
MeleD. (2003). The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 77-88.
46.
MitroffI. I.DentonE. A. (1999). A spiritual audit of corporate America. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
47.
NordW.FoxS. (1996). The individual in organizational studies: The great disappearing act? In CleggS. R.HardyC.NordW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational studies (pp. 148-175). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
ParameshwarS. (2005). Spiritual leadership through ego-transcendence: Exceptional responses to challenging circumstances. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 689-722.
49.
PauchantT. C.MorinE. (2008). Organizational existentialism. In CleggS.BaileyJ. R. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of organizational studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
PawarB. S. (2009). Workplace spirituality facilitation: A comprehensive model. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 375-386.
ReedyP. (2008). Mirror, mirror, on the wall: Reflecting on the ethics and effects of a collective critical management studies identity project. Management Learning, 39, 57-72.
53.
SandbergJ.PinningtonA. H. (2009). Professional competence as ways of being: An existential ontological perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 1138-1170.
54.
SartreJ. P. (1957). Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology. New York, NY: Philosophical Library.
55.
SartreJ. P. (1963). Search for a method. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
56.
SheepM. L. (2006). Nurturing the whole person: The ethics of workplace spirituality in a society of organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 357-375.
57.
SkalenP. (2004). New Public Management reform and the construction of organizational identities. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17, 251-263.
58.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59.
SuddabyR. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 633-642.
60.
VansinaL. S. (1998). The individual in the organisations: Rediscovered or lost for ever?European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 7, 265-282.
61.
WallaceP. (2009). Why do women CA’s leave public accounting firms before reaching the partnership level? Stories told by women CA’s provide different answers to this same old question. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 26, 179-196.
62.
WeilS. (2003). Gravity and grace. London, England: Routledge Classics.
63.
WestA. (2008). Sartrean existentialism and ethical decision-making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 15-25.
64.
YueA. R.MillsA. J. (2008). Making sense out of bad faith: Sartre, Weick and existential sensemaking in organizational analysis. Tamara: Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science, 7, 66-80.
65.
ZaldM. (1993). Organization studies as scientific and humanistic enterprise: Toward a reconceptualization of the foundations of the field. Organization Science, 4, 513-528.
