Much is already known about how theory groups—schools of thought centered on the influential works of a small number of scholars—emerge. Yet, little is known about how prolonged periods of conflict between theory groups affects the theory-group life cycle. The author presents a review of critiques and exchanges published by scholars in the organization-environment subfield, and shows that these can be used to identify “emergence,” “conflict,” and “postconflict” periods. Poisson and negative binomial regression analyses of 656 publications show that the frequency of intertheory-group citations decreased following the conflict period (1985-1994). Linear regression models show that, when intertheory-group citations appeared following the conflict period, they were increasingly likely to be of older rather than newer publications. The results suggest that periods of heightened conflict, because of their effect on intertheory-group citations, may impact future theory development.
AldrichH. E. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
AldrichH. E. (1988). Paradigm warriors: Donaldson versus the critics of organization theory. Organization Studies, 9, 19-25.
3.
AldrichH. E.PfefferJ. (1976). Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 79-105.
4.
BarneyJ. B. (1990). The debate between traditional management theory and organizational economics: Substantive differences or intergroup conflict?Academy of Management Review, 15, 382-393.
5.
BarneyJ. B.OuchiW. G. (1986). Organizational economics. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
BaumJ. A. C. (1996). Organizational ecology. In CleggS. R.HardyC.NordW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 77-114). London, England: SAGE.
7.
BaumJ. A. C.PowellW. W. (1995). Cultivating an institutional ecology of organizations—Comment. American Sociological Review, 60, 529-538.
8.
BaumJ. A. C.ShipilovA. V. (2006). Ecological approaches to organizations. In CleggS. R.HardyC.LawrenceT.NordW. R. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies (2nd ed., pp. 55-110). London, England: SAGE.
9.
BecherT.TrowlerP. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
10.
BouchikhiH. (1998). Living with and building on complexity: A constructivist perspective on organizations. Organization, 5, 217-232.
11.
BrintonM. C.NeeV. G. (1998). The new institutionalism in sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
BrittainJ. W.WholeyD. R. (1989). Assessing organizational ecology as sociological theory—Comment on Young. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 439-444.
13.
BurrellG.MorganG. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. London, England: Heinemann.
14.
CannellaA. A.PaetzoldR. L. (1994). Pfeffer barriers to the advance of organizational science: A rejoinder. Academy of Management Review, 19, 331-341.
15.
CaoY.NeeV. G. (2000). Comment: Controversies and evidence in the market transition debate. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1175-1189.
16.
CarrollG. R.HannanM. T. (1989a). Density dependence in the evolution of populations of newspaper organizations. American Sociological Review, 54, 524-541.
17.
CarrollG. R.HannanM. T. (1989b). On using institutional theory in studying organizational populations—Reply. American Sociological Review, 54, 545-548.
18.
CasciaroT.PisorskiM. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 167-199.
19.
ChandlerA. D. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
20.
ChubinD. E. (1976). The conceptualization of scientific specialties. Sociological Quarterly, 17(Autumn), 448-476.
21.
ClarkJ.MurdochJ. (1997). Local knowledge and the precarious extension of scientific networks. Sociologia Ruralis, 37, 38-60.
22.
CleggS. R.HardyC.LawrenceT.NordW. R. (Eds.). (2006). The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.
23.
CoatesR.UpdegraffD. E. (1973). The relationship between organizational size and the administrative component of banks. Journal of Business, 46, 576-588.
24.
CoatesR.UpdegraffD. E. (1976). Relationship between organizational size and administrative component of banks—Reply. Journal of Business, 49, 66-67.
25.
ColeS. (1992). Making science: Between nature and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
ColeS. (1994). Why sociology doesn’t make progress like the natural sciences. Sociological Forum, 9, 133-154.
27.
CookK. S.ShortellS. M.ConradD. A.MorriseyM. A. (1983). A theory of organizational response to regulation: The case of hospitals. Academy of Management Review, 8, 193-205.
28.
CookK. S.ShortellS. M.ConradD. A.MorriseyM. A. (1985). A theory of organizational response to hospital regulation—A Reply. Academy of Management Review, 10, 337-343.
29.
CzarniawskaB. (1998). Who is afraid of incommensurability?Organization, 5, 273-275.
30.
DavisG. F.PowellW. W. (1992). Organization-environment relations. In DunnetteM. D.HoughL. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 315-375). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
31.
De CockC.JeanesE. L. (2006). Questioning consensus, cultivating conflict. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 18-30.
32.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
33.
DobrevS. D. (2001). Revisiting organizational legitimation: Cognitive diffusion and sociopolitical factors in the evolution of Bulgarian newspaper enterprises, 1846-1992. Organization Studies, 22, 419-444.
34.
DobrevS. D.OzdemirS. Z.TeoA. C. (2006). The ecological interdependence of emergent and established organizational populations: Legitimacy transfer, violation by comparison, and unstable identities. Organization Science, 17, 577-597.
35.
DonaldsonL. (1985). In defense of organization theory: A reply to the critics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36.
DonaldsonL. (1988). In successful defense of organization theory: A routing of the critics. Organization Studies, 9, 28-32.
37.
DonaldsonL. (1990a). The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. Academy of Management Review, 15, 369-381.
38.
DonaldsonL. (1990b). A rational basis for criticisms of organizational economics—A Reply to Barney. Academy of Management Review, 15, 394-401.
39.
DonaldsonL. (1995). American anti-management theories of organization: A critique of paradigm proliferation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40.
DonaldsonL. (1996). The normal science of structural contingency theory. In CleggS. R.HardyC.NordW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 57-76). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
41.
DonaldsonL. (1998). The myth of paradigm incommensurability in management studies: Comments by an integrationist. Organization, 5, 267-272.
42.
EcclesR. G. (1987). Review: [untitled]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 602-605.
43.
EspelandW. N.StevensM. L. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313-343.
44.
FreelandR. F. (1996). The myth of the M-form? Governance, consent, and organizational change. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 483-526.
45.
FreemanJ. H.HannanM. T. (1983). Niche width and the dynamics of organizational populations. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 1116-1145.
46.
FreemanJ. H.HannanM. T. (1987). The population ecology of restaurants revisited—Reply to Herriott. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1214-1220.
47.
FreemanJ. H.HannanM. T. (1989). Setting the record straight on organizational ecology—Rebuttal to Young. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 425-439.
48.
FuchsS. (1993). A sociological-theory of scientific change. Social Forces, 71, 933-953.
49.
GergenM. (1998). Proliferating discourses: Resources for relationships. Organization, 5, 277-280.
50.
GeyskensI.SteenkampJ. E. M.KumarN. (2006). Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 519-543.
51.
GioiaD. A.PitreE. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15, 584-602.
52.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
53.
HamiltonG. G.BiggartN. W. (1988). Market, culture, and authority: A comparative analysis of management and organization in the Far East. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S52-S94.
54.
HamiltonG. G.BiggartN. W. (1991). The organization of business in Taiwan—Reply. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 999-1006.
55.
HannanM. T.CarrollG. R. (1995). Theory building and cheap talk about legitimation—Reply. American Sociological Review, 60, 539-544.
56.
HannanM. T.CarrollG. R.DundonE. A.TorresJ. C. (1995). Organizational evolution in a multinational context: Entries of automobile manufacturers in Belgium, Britain, France, Germany, and Italy. American Sociological Review, 60, 509-528.
57.
HannanM. T.FreemanJ. H. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929-964.
58.
HannanM. T.PolosL.CarrollG. R. (2007). Logics of organization theory: Audiences, codes, and ecologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
HardyC. (2002). On the edge of a pluralistic world. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11, 16-18.
60.
HassardJ. (1988). Overcoming Hermeticism in organization theory: An alternative to paradigm incommensurability. Human Relations, 41, 247-259.
61.
HassardJ. (1991). Multiple paradigms and organizational analysis: A case study. Organization Studies, 12, 275-299.
62.
HassardJ.KelemenM. (2002). Production and consumption in organizational knowledge: The case of the “Paradigms Debate”. Organization, 9, 331-355.
63.
HerriottS. R. (1987). Fitness-set theory in the population ecology of organizations—Comment. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1210-1214.
64.
HirschP. M. (1997). Review: Sociology without social structure: Neoinstitutional theory meets brave new world. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 1702-1723.
65.
HirschP. M. (1998). Rejoinder to Scott. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 1049-1051.
66.
ISI Web of Knowledge. (2008). Journal Citation Reports.
67.
JacksonN.CarterP. (1991). In defense of paradigm incommensurability. Organization Studies, 12, 109.
68.
JacksonN.CarterP. (1993). “Paradigm Wars”: A response to Hugh Willmott. Organization Studies, 14, 721.
KaghanW.PhillipsN. (1998). Building the tower of Babel: Communities of practice and paradigmatic pluralism in organization studies. Organization, 5, 191-215.
71.
KatzF. E. (1979). Organizational theory and cultural intrusions into organizations—Comment. American Sociological Review, 44, 667-668.
72.
KelemenM.BansalR. (2002). The conventions of management research and their relevance to management practice. British Journal of Management, 13, 97-108.
73.
KnightsD. (2008). Myopic rhetorics: Reflecting epistemologically and ethically on the demand for relevance in organizational and management research. Academy of Management, Learning & Education, 7, 537-552.
74.
KuhnT. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
75.
LangtonJ. (1984). The ecological theory of bureaucracy: The case of Josiah Wedgwood and the British pottery industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 330-354.
76.
LangtonJ. (1985). Ecological theory of bureaucracy—Reply. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 284-288.
77.
LatourB. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
78.
LatourB.WoolgarS. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
79.
LawrenceP.LorschJ. W. (1967). Organization and environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80.
LincolnJ. R.OlsonJ.HanadaM. (1978). Cultural effects on organizational structure: The case of Japanese firms in the United States. American Sociological Review, 43, 829-847.
81.
LincolnJ. R.OlsonJ.HanadaM. (1979). Organization theory and cultural intrusions into organizations—Reply. American Sociological Review, 44, 668-668.
82.
LincolnJ. R.ZeitzG. (1980). Organizational properties from aggregate data: Separating individual and structural effects. American Sociological Review, 45, 391-408.
83.
LincolnJ. R.ZeitzG. (1981). Levels of causation and levels of data collection in the study of organizational properties. American Sociological Review, 46, 699-702.
84.
LokJ.WillmottH. (2006). Institutional theory, language, and discourse analysis: A comment on Phillips, Lawrence, and Hardy. Academy of Management Review, 31, 477-480.
85.
LorschJ. W.MorseJ. J. (1974). Organizations and their members: A contingency approach. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
86.
LorschJ. W.MorseJ. J. (1975). Organizations and their members—Reply. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 631-631.
87.
LottoL. S. (1983). Tightening up loose couplings in organizations of higher-education—Comment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 294-296.
88.
LutzF. W. (1982). Tightening up loose coupling in organizations of higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 653-669.
89.
LutzF. W. (1983). More on loose coupling—Reply. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 296-298.
90.
McKelveyB. (2006). Van de Ven and Johnson’s “Engaged Scholarship”: Nice Try, But. Academy of Management Review, 31, 822-829.
91.
McKinleyW. (2007). Managing knowledge in organization studies through instrumentation. Organization, 14, 123-146.
92.
McKinleyW. (2010). Organizational theory development: Displacement of ends?Organization Studies, 31, 47-68.
93.
McKinleyW.MoneM. A. (1998). The re-construction of organization studies: Wrestling with incommensurability. Organization, 5, 169-189.
94.
McKinleyW.MoneM. A.MoonG. (1999). Determinants and development of schools in organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 634-648.
95.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
96.
MeyerM. W.StevensonW. B. (1981). On the use and abuse of aggregate data in analyzing organizations—Comment. American Sociological Review, 46, 697-699.
97.
MorganG. (1987). Review: In defense of organization theory: A Reply to the Critics by Lex Donaldson. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 605-607.
98.
MullinsN. C. (1983). Theories and theory groups revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 319-337.
99.
MullinsN. C.MullinsC. J. (1973). Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
100.
MurphyN. B. (1976). Relationship between organizational size and administrative component of banks—Comment. Journal of Business, 49, 62-65.
101.
NeeV. (2005). The new institutionalisms in economics and sociology. In SmelserN. J.SwedbergR. (Eds.), Handbook of economic sociology (pp. 49-74). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
102.
NomaE. (1984). Co-citation analysis and the invisible college. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35, 29-33.
103.
NumazakiI. (1991). State and business in postwar Taiwan: Comment on Hamilton and Biggart. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 993-998.
104.
Ofori-DankwaJ.JulianS. D. (2005). From thought to theory to school: The role of contextual factors in the evolution of schools of management thought. Organization Studies, 26, 1307-1329.
105.
ParkerM.McHughG. (1991). Five texts in search of an author: A response to John Hassard’s “Multiple Paradigms and Organizational Analysis”. Organization Studies, 12, 451-456.
106.
PerrowC. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32, 194-208.
107.
PerrowC. (1981). Markets, hierarchies and hegemony: A Critique of Chandler and Williamson. In Van de VenA. H.JoyceW. H. (Eds.), Organizational design (pp. 288-294). New York, NY: Wiley.
108.
PerrowC. (1985a). Comment on Langton’s Ecological theory of bureaucracy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 278-283.
109.
PerrowC. (1985b). Complex organizations: A critical essay (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Random House.
110.
PerrowC. (1994). Pfeffer slips!Academy of Management Review, 19, 191-194.
111.
PerrowC. (2002). Organizing America: Wealth, power, and the origins of corporate capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
112.
PetersenT.KoputK. W. (1991). Unobserved heterogeneity or legitimacy in density dependence. American Sociological Review, 56, 416-416.
113.
PfefferJ. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18, 599-620.
114.
PfefferJ. (2003). The external control of organizations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
115.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
116.
PhillipsN.LawrenceT. B.HardyC. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29, 635-652.
117.
PhillipsN.LawrenceT. B.HardyC. (2006). Discussing “Discourse and institutions”: A Reply to Lok and Willmott. Academy of Management Review, 31, 480-483.
118.
PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
119.
SchererA. G. (1998). Pluralism and incommensurability in strategic management and organization theory: A problem in search of a solution. Organization, 5, 147-168.
120.
SchererA. G.SteinmannH. (1999). Some remarks on the problem of incommensurability in organization studies. Organization Studies, 20, 519-544.
121.
SchultzM.HatchM. J. (1996). Living with multiple paradigms: The case of paradigm interplay in organizational culture studies. Academy of Management Review, 21, 529-557.
122.
SchwarzG. M.CleggS. R.CummingsT. G.DonaldsonL.MinerJ. B. (2007). We see dead people? The state of organization science. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16, 300-317.
123.
ScottW. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations: Theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
124.
ScottW. R. (1998). Response to Hirsch’s review essay. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 1047-1048.
125.
ShanleyM. (1996). Straw men and M-form myths: Comment on Freeland. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 527-536.
126.
SmallH. G. (1979). Co-citation context analysis: Relationship between bibliometric structure and knowledge. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, 16, 270-275.
127.
SmallH. G. (1980). Co-citation context analysis and the structure of paradigms. Journal of Documentation, 36, 183-196.
128.
SmithH. L.MickS. S. (1985). A theory of organizational response to hospital regulation: A Reply. Academy of Management Review, 10, 332-336.
129.
SpenderJ. C. (1998). Pluralist epistemology and the knowledge-based theory of the firm. Organization, 5, 233-256.
130.
TadajewskiM. (2009). The debate that won’t die? Values incommensurability, antagonism and theory choice. Organization, 16, 467-485.
131.
ThompsonJ. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
132.
Van de VenA. H. (1979). Review: Organizations and environments by Howard E. Aldrich. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 320-326.
133.
WeaverG. R.GioiaD. A. (1994). Paradigms lost: Incommensurability vs. structurationist inquiry. Organization Studies, 15, 565-590.
134.
WeissA. R. (1987). Review: Babies and bath water, forests and trees. Academy of Management Review, 12, 381-385.
135.
WilliamsonO. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York, NY: Free Press.
136.
WilliamsonO. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York, NY: Free Press.
137.
WilliamsonO. E. (1994). Transaction cost economics and organizational theory. In SmelserN. J.SwedbergR. (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Sociology (pp. 77-107). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
138.
WilliamsonO. E. (2005). Transaction cost economics. In MenardC.ShirleyM. M. (Eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics (pp. 41-65). New York, NY: Springer.
139.
WillmottH. (1993a). Breaking the paradigm mentality. Organization Studies, 14, 681.
140.
WillmottH. (1993b). Paradigm Gridlock: A Reply. Organization Studies, 14, 727-730.
141.
YoungR. C. (1988). Is population ecology a useful paradigm for the study of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 1-24.
142.
ZhouX. G. (2000). Reply: Beyond the debate and toward substantive institutional analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1190-1195.
143.
ZuckerL. G. (1989). Combining institutional theory and population ecology—No legitimacy, no history. American Sociological Review, 54, 542-545.
