Working within the tradition that sees space as narrative, in this paper we argue that the way space is constructed in popular films frames certain meanings about corporations that reflect the way that power relations are produced and reproduced in organizational contexts. We see power in Foucaultian terms and analyze the relationship of space and power in regard to three interrelated dimensions: the power enacted by the individuals in space, the symbolic power enacted by organizations through the use of space, and the power that space carries in and of itself so that space structures (or restructures) relationships. At the same time, we discuss how resistance is enabled in organizations both despite and due to space. Although physical space is often seen as a source of organizational power, both physically and symbolically, its relationship to resistance is much less well understood. We focus then on how the constitution of a “resistant subject” becomes central to the narrative about organizational space and how the subject’s acts highlight the notion that power and resistance are not analytical opposites but rather semiological co-constructions, accessed through the physical and mental space provided by film.
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. ( 1996). Making sense of management. London , UK: Sage.
2.
Becker, F.D. ( 1981). Work space: Creating environments in organizations . New York, NY: Praeger.
3.
Belk, R.W. ( 1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139-168.
4.
Bell, E. ( 2008). Reading management and organization in film. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
Berg, P.O., & Kreiner, K. ( 1990). Corporate architecture: Turning physical settings into symbolic resources. In P. Gagliardi (Ed.), Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape (pp. 41-67). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
6.
Bordwell, D. ( 2006). The way Hollywood tells it: Story and style in modern movies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Brown, G., Lawrence, T.B., & Robinson, S.L. (2005). Territoriality in organizations . Academy of Management Review, 30, 577-594.
8.
Cairns, G. ( 2002). Aesthetics, morality and power: Design as espoused freedom and implicit control. Human Relations, 55, 799-820.
9.
Chan, J., Beckman, S., & Lawrence, P. ( 2007). Workplace design: A new managerial imperative . California Management Review, 49, 6-22.
10.
Clegg, S. ( 1994). Power relations and the constitution of the resistant subject. In J. Jermier, D. Knights, & W. Nord (Eds.), Resistance and power in organizations (pp. 274-326). London, UK: Routledge.
11.
Clegg, S. ( 1998). Foucault, power and organizations. In A. McKinlay & K. Starkey (Eds.), Foucault, management and organization theory (pp. 29-48). London , UK: Sage.
12.
Clegg, S. ( 2010). The state, power, and agency: Missing in action in institutional theory?Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 4-13.
13.
Clegg, S., & Kornberger, M. (2006). Organising space. In S. Clegg & M. Kornberger (Eds.), Space, organizations and management theory (pp. 143-162). Copenhagen, Denmark: Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press.
14.
Crang, M., & Thrift, N. ( 2000). Thinking space. London, UK: Routledge.
15.
Crouch, C. ( 2000). Modernism in art design and architecture. New York: St. Martins Press.
16.
Czarniawska, B. ( 1997). Narrating the organization: Dramas of institutional identity . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago .
17.
Czarniawska, B., & Rhodes, C. ( 2006). Strong plots: Popular culture in management practice and theory. In P. Gagliardi & B. Czarniawska (Eds.), Management education and humanities (pp. 195-218). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
18.
Dale, K., & Burrell, G. ( 2003). Aesthetics and anaesthetics. In P. Hancock & A. Carr (Eds.), Art and aesthetics at work (pp. 23-45). Basingstoke , UK: Palgrave.
19.
Dale, K., & Burrell, G. ( 2008). The spaces of organization and the organization of space: Power, identity and materiality at work. Basingstoke , UK: Palgrave.
20.
de Certeau, M. ( 1999). Walking in the sky. In S. During (Ed.), The cultural studies reader (pp. 126-133). London, UK: Routledge.
21.
Denzin, N. ( 1995). The cinematic society: The voyeur’s gaze . London, UK: Sage.
22.
Dougherty, D., & Kunda, G. ( 1990). Photograph analysis: A method to capture organizational belief systems. In P. Gagliardi (Ed.), Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape (pp. 185-206). Berlin, Germany: de Grutyer.
23.
Dovey, K. ( 1999). Framing places: Mediating power in built form . London, UK: Routledge.
24.
Elsbach, K.D. ( 2003). Relating physical environment to self categorizations: A study of identity threat and affirmation in a non-territorial office space . Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 622-654.
25.
Elsbach, K.D. ( 2004). Interpreting workplace identities: The role of office décor. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 99-128.
26.
Elsbach, K.D., & Pratt, M.G. ( 2008). The physical environment in organizations. In J. Walsh & A. Brief (Eds.), Academy of Management Annals (Vol. 1, pp. 181-224). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
27.
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. ( 2004). "You can checkout anytime, but you can never leave": Spatial boundaries in a high commitment organization. Human Relations, 57, 75-94.
28.
Foucault, M. ( 1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison . London, UK: Allen Lane.
29.
Foucault, M. ( 1980). Power/knoweldge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-77, edited by C. Gordon.Brighton, Sus-sex: Harvester Press.
30.
Foucault, M. ( 1984). The foucault reader, edited by P. Rabinow.Harmondsworth: Penguin .
31.
Foucault, M. ( 1994). Aesthetics: Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984 (Vol. 2). London, UK: Penguin .
32.
Gagliardi, P. ( 1990). Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape . Berlin, Germany: de Grutyer.
33.
Gagliardi, P. ( 1996). Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 565-580). London, UK: Sage.
34.
Geertz, C. ( 1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
35.
Gemser, G., Leenders, M., & Wijnberg, N. ( 2008). Why some awards are more effective signals of quality than others: A study of movie awards. Journal of Management , 34, 25-54.
36.
Giddens, A. ( 1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
37.
Gieryn, T. ( 2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 463-496.
38.
Hall, S. ( 1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London, UK: Sage.
39.
Harvey, D. ( 1985). Monument and myth: The building of the basilica of the sacred heart. In D. Harvey (Ed.), Consciousness and the urban experience (pp. 5-17). Oxford , UK: Blackwell.
40.
Hassard, J., & Holliday, R. ( 1998). Introduction. In J. Hassard & R. Holliday (Eds.), Organization-representation: Work and organization in popular culture (pp. 1-15). London , UK: Sage.
41.
Hatch, M.J. ( 1997). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42.
Hernes, T. ( 2004). The spatial construction of organization. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins .
43.
Hernes, T., Bakken, T., & Olsen, P.I. ( 2006). Spaces as process: Developing a recursive perspective on organisational space. In S. Clegg & M. Kornberger (Eds.), Space, organizations and management theory (pp. 44-63). Copenhagen, Denmark: Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press.
44.
Hofbauer, J. ( 2000). Bodies in a landscape: An office design and organization . In J. Hassard, R. Holliday, & H. Willmott (Eds.), Body and organization (pp. 166-191). London, UK: Sage.
45.
King, A. ( 2004). Spaces of global cultures. London , UK: Routledge.
46.
Knights, D., & Vurdubakis, T. (1994). Foucault, resistance, power and all that. In J. Jermier, D. Knights, & W. Nord (Eds.), Resistance & power in organizations (pp. 167-198). London, UK: Routledge.
47.
Kornberger, M., & Clegg, S. ( 2004). Bringing space back in: Organizing the generative building . Organization Studies, 25, 1095-1114.
48.
Kyriakidou, O., & Özbilgin, M. (2006). Relational perspectives in organizational studies: A research companion. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
49.
Lakoff, G. ( 1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
50.
Lash, S., & Urry, J. ( 1994). Economies of signs and space. London , UK: Sage.
51.
Lawson, B. ( 2001). The language of space. London , UK: Architectural Press.
52.
Le Corbusier ( 2008). Towards a new architecture. London , UK: BN.
53.
Lefebvre, H. ( 1991). The production of space. Malden, MA : Blackwell.
54.
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. ( 1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis and interpretation . London, UK: Sage.
55.
Mamet, D. ( 1994). Glengarry Glen Ross. New York, NY : Grove Press.
56.
Markus, T. ( 1994). Buildings and power: Freedom and control in the origin of modern building types. London, UK: Routledge.
57.
Markus, T. ( 2006). Built space and power. In S. Clegg & M. Kornberger (Eds.), Space, organizations and management theory (pp. 129-142). Copenhagen , Denmark: Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press .
58.
Markus, T., & Cameron, D. ( 2002). The words between the spaces: Buildings and language . London, UK: Routledge.
59.
McDowell, L. ( 1998). Fictional money (or, greed isn’t so good in the 1990s). In J. Hassard & R. Holliday (Eds.), Organization- representation: Work and organization in popular culture (pp. 167-199). London, UK: Sage.
60.
Mulvey, L. ( 1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16, 6-18.
61.
Phillips, N. ( 1995). Telling organizational tales: On the role of narrative fiction in the study of organizations. Organization Studies , 16, 625-650.
62.
Rafaeli, A., & Pratt, M. ( 1993). Tailored meaning: On the meaning and impact of organizational dress. Academy if Management Review, 18(1), 32-55.
63.
Rafaeli, A., & Pratt, M. ( 2006). Artifacts and organization: More than the tip of the cultural iceberg. In A. Rafaeli & M. Pratt (Eds.), Artifacts and organizations: Beyond mere symbolism (pp. 1-15). London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
64.
Rhodes, C. ( 2007). Outside the gates of Eden: Utopia and work in rock music . Group & Organization Management, 32, 22-49.
65.
Rhodes, C., & Brown, A. ( 2005). Writing responsibly: Narrative fiction and organization studies. Organization, 12, 467-491.
66.
Rhodes, C., & Parker, M. ( 2008). Images of organizing in popular culture. Organization, 15, 627-637.
67.
Rhodes, C., & Westwood, R. ( 2008). Critical representations of work and organization in popular culture. London, UK: Routledge .
68.
Rosen, M., Orlikowski, W., & Schmahmann, K. (1990). Building buildings and living lives: A critique of bureaucracy, ideology and concrete artifacts. In P. Gagliardi (Ed.), Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape (pp. 69-82). Berlin , Germany: de Grutyer.
69.
Rusted, B. ( 1990). Housing modifications as organizational communication . In P. Gagliardi (Ed.), Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape (pp. 85-100). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
70.
Savage, M., & Warde, A. ( 1993). Urban sociology, capitalism, and modernity. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
71.
Sitton, S. ( 1984). The messy desk effect: How tidiness affects the perception of others. Journal of Psychology, 117, 263-267.
72.
Sloane, S. ( 2001). Organizations in the movies: The legend of the dysfunctional system. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
73.
Strati, A. ( 2006). Organizational artifacts and the aesthetic approach . In A. Rafaeli & M. Pratt (Eds.), Artifacts and organizations: Beyond mere symbolism (pp. 23-40). London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
74.
Strati, A., & de Montoux, P.G. (2002). Introduction: Organizing aesthetics. Human Relations, 55, 755-766.
75.
Suddaby, R. ( 2010). Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 14-20.
76.
Taylor, S., & Spicer, A. ( 2007). Time for space: A narrative review of research on organizational spaces. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 325-346.
77.
Townley, B. ( 1993). Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 18, 518-546.
78.
Van Marrewijk, A. ( 2009). Corporate headquarters as physical embodiments of organisational change. Journal of Organizational Change , 22(3), 290-306.
79.
Voytilla, S. ( 1999). Myth and the movies: Discovering the mythic structure of 50 unforgettable films. Studio City, CA: Michael Wiese Productions.
80.
Wasserman, W., & Frenkel, M. (IN PRESS). Organizational aesthetics: Between identity regulation and culture Jamming (Working Paper No. ). The Open University in Ra’anana.
81.
Weick, K. ( 1995). Making sense of the organization. London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Available from http://www.imdb.com,http://www.cnn.com
82.
Yanow, D. ( 1995). Built space as story: The policy stories that buildings tell. Policy Studies Journal, 23, 407-422.
83.
Yanow, D. ( 1998). Space stories: Studying museum buildings as organizational spaces while reflecting on interpretive methods and their narration. Journal of Management Inquiry, 7, 215-239.
84.
Yanow, D. ( 2006). Studying physical artifacts: An interpretive approach . In A. Rafaeli & M. Pratt (Eds), Artifacts and organizations: Beyond mere symbolism (pp. 41-60). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
85.
Zalesny, M.D., & Farace, R.V. ( 1987). Traditional versus open spaces: A comparison of sociotechnical, social relations, and symbolic meaning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 240-259.
