Catholic social teaching makes the moral argument for the importance of dignity at work, and organization studies scholars have documented workers’ plight. Yet, neither perspective sufficiently provides a sense of the feelings that managers and employees have toward one another. Adopting an aesthetics approach, and drawing from comic art and the cartoon strip Dilbert, this research provides an alternative view to understand challenges to employee dignity. Like aesthetics and art, comic art reflects feelings and attitudes and aims to provide insight into contemporary life. The results from surveying Dilbert found that managers often viewed their subordinates as exploitable commodities and threatened them with abuse. They point to a possible structural explanation for why employers view their workers so disparagingly and why employees feel their dignity challenged. This research makes evident the potential value of an aesthetics/comic arts perspective to understand and address issues concerning human behavior in the workplace.
Adams, S. ( 1995). Bring me the head of Willy the mailboy!Kansas City, MO: Andrews McMeel.
2.
Adams, S. ( 1996a). The Dilbert principle: A cubicle’s-eye view of bosses, meetings, management fads & other workplace afflictions. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
3.
Adams, S. ( 1996b). Dogbert’s top secret management handbook. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
4.
Adams, S. ( 1996c). Fugitive from the cubicle police. Kansas City, MO: Andrews McMeel.
5.
Adams, S. ( 1996d). Still pumped from using the mouse. Kansas City, MO: Andrews McMeel.
6.
Adams, S. ( 1997a). Casual day has gone too far. Kansas City, MO: Andrews McMeel.
7.
Adams, S. ( 1997b). Seven years of highly defective people: Scott Adams’ guided tour of the revolution of Dilbert. Kansas City, MO: Andrews McMeel.
8.
Adams, S. ( 1998a). Journey to cubeville. Kansas City, MO: Andrews McMeel.
9.
Adams, S. ( 1998b). The joy of work: Dilbert’s guide to finding happiness at the expense of your co-workers. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
10.
Adams, S. ( 1999). Don’t step in the leadership. Kansas City, MO: Andrews McMeel.
11.
Adams, S. ( 2000). Dilbert: A treasury of Sunday strips: Version 00. Kansas City, MO: Andrews McMeel.
12.
Adler, N.J. ( 2006). The arts & leadership: Now that we can do anything, what will we do? Academy of Management Learning & Education , 5, 486-499.
13.
Agassi, J.B. ( 1986). Dignity in the workplace: Can work be dealienated? Journal of Business Ethics, 5, 271-284.
14.
Anderson, R.E., & Jolly, E. ( 1977). Stereotyped traits and sex roles in humorous drawings . Communication Research, 4, 453-484.
15.
Andersson, L.M., & Pearson, C.M. ( 1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452-471.
16.
Argyris, C. ( 1964). Integrating the individual and the organization. New York, NY: Wiley.
17.
Ashforth, B. ( 1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47, 755-779.
18.
Bandura, A. ( 1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1-45). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Barcus, F.E. ( 1963). The world of Sunday comics. In D. M. White & R. H. Abel (Eds.), The funnies: An American idiom (pp. 190-218). London: Free Press.
20.
Barley, S.R., & Kunda, G. ( 2001). Bringing work back in. Organization Science , 12, 76-95.
21.
Bassman, E., & London, M. ( 1993). Abusive managerial behaviour. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 14, 18-24.
22.
Belk, R.W. ( 1987). Material values in the comics: A content analysis of comic books featuring themes of wealth. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 26-42.
23.
Berg, P., & Frost, A.C. ( 2005). Dignity at work for low wage, low skill service workers . Industrial Relations, 60, 657-682.
24.
Blauner, R. ( 1964). Alienation and freedom. Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press.
25.
Bogardus, E.S. ( 1945). Sociology of the cartoon. Sociology and Social Research, 30, 39-147.
26.
Boje, D.M. ( 1991). The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly , 36, 106-126.
27.
Bolton, S.C. ( 2007). Dimensions of dignity at work. Amsterdam , The Netherlands: Elsevier.
28.
Brown, T. ( 1996). The deeper side of ‘Dilbert’. Management Review, 85(2), 48-52.
29.
Calvez, J.Y., & Naughton, M.J. (2002). Catholic social teaching and the purpose of the business organization: A developing tradition. In S. A. Cortright & M. J. Naughton (Eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business: Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition (pp. 3-19). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
30.
Carlen, C. ( 1981). Laborem exercens. In The papal encyclicals 1959-1981, 5, 299-326. Wilmington, North Carolina: McGrath Publishing Co.
31.
Carrier, D. ( 2000). The aesthetics of comics. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
32.
Chavez, D. ( 1985). Perpetuation of gender inequity: A content analysis of comic strips. Sex Roles, 13, 93-102.
33.
Cheng, C., & Dennehy, R.F. ( 1996). Terse organizational storytelling at its best: An interview with cartoonist Scott Adams of DILBERT. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5, 207-213.
34.
Davis, J. ( 2000). ‘Dilbert’ as organizational analyst. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 4755.
35.
Davis, J. ( 2001). Power to the cubicle-dwellers: An ideological reading of Dilbert. In M. P. McAllister, E. H. Sewell, Jr., & I. Gordon (Eds.), Comics & ideology (pp. 275-300). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
36.
Deeks, J. ( 1993). Business and the culture of the enterprise society. Westport, CT: Quorum.
37.
DePree, M. ( 1992). Leadership jazz. New York, NY: Dell.
38.
Doherty, E.M. ( 2006). Viewing work historically through art: Incorporating the visual arts into organizational studies. Journal of Management History, 12, 137-153.
39.
Doherty, E.M. ( 2009). Management and art views of depression era workers: The need for an organizational-arts perspective. Management & Organizational History, 4, 5-36.
40.
Durkheim, E. ( 1984/1933). The division of labor in society (W. D. Halls, Trans.). New York, NY: Free Press .
41.
Dutton, J.E., Dukerich, J.M., & Harquail, C.V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.
42.
Ehrenreich, B. ( 2001). Nickel and dimed: On (not) getting by in America. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
43.
Feldman, D.C. ( 2000). The Dilbert syndrome: How employee cynicism about ineffective management is changing the nature of careers in organizations. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 1286-1300.
44.
Freeman, R.B., & Rogers, J. ( 1999). What workers want. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
45.
Fuller, R.W. ( 2003). Somebodies and nobodies: Overcoming the abuse of rank . Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society.
46.
Fuller, R.W. ( 2006). All rise: Somebodies, nobodies, and the politics of dignity . San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler
47.
Fuller, R.W., & Gerloff, P.A. ( 2008). Dignity for all: How to create a world without rankism . San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler .
48.
Gagliardi, P. ( 1996). Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 565-580). London: SAGE.
49.
Gendron, G. ( 1996, July). Dilbert fired! Starts new biz (Cover story). Inc, 18(10), 9.
50.
Gioia, D.A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K.G. ( 2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability . Academy of Management Review, 25, 63-81.
51.
Gregory, D.L. ( 1998, March). Catholic social teaching on work. Labor Law Journal, 49(3), 912-919.
52.
Goffman, E. ( 1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
53.
Grosman, B.A. ( 1989). Corporate loyalty, does it have a future? Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 565-568.
54.
Higgins, S.H. ( 1996). Towards taming the labor-management frontier: A strategic marketing framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 475-485.
55.
Hodson, R. ( 2001). Dignity at work. UKCambridge University Press.
56.
Hodson, R., & Roscigno, V.J. (2004). Organizational success and worker dignity: Complementary or contradictory? American Journal of Sociology, 110, 672-708.
57.
Kassarjian, H.H. ( 1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 8-18.
58.
Kassarjian, H.H. ( 1983). Social values and the Sunday comics: A content analysis . Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 434-438.
59.
Kessler, E.H. ( 2001). The idols of organizational theory: From Francis Bacon to the Dilbert Principle. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10, 285-297.
60.
Kohn, M.L., & Schooler, C. ( 1983). Work and personality. Norwood, NJ : Ablex.
61.
Lamons, B. ( 1996). ‘Dilbert’s’ funny, but not real. Marketing News, 30(21), 16.
62.
Larsen, E. ( 1980). Wit as a weapon: The political joke in history. London: Frederick Muller.
63.
Levy, S., & Stone, B. ( 1996, August 12). Working in Dilbert’s world (Cover story) . Newsweek, 128(7), 52.
64.
Likert, R. ( 1967). The human organization. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
65.
Marx, K. ( 1971/1887). Capital (Vol. 1). New York, NY: International.
66.
Maslow, A.H. ( 1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper Brothers.
67.
McAllister, M.P., Sewell, E.H., Jr., & Gordon, I. ( 2001). Introducing comics and ideology. In M. P. McAllister, E. H. Sewell, Jr., & I. Gordon (Eds.), Comics & ideology (pp. 1-13). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
68.
McCormally, K., & Rheault, M. ( 1997, January). Dilbert gets a raise (Cover story). Kiplinger’s Personal Finance Magazine, 51(1), 83.
69.
McGarvey, R. ( 1997, September). The Adams principle. Entrepreneur , 25(9), 11.
70.
McGregor, D. ( 1960). The human side of enterprise. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
71.
Melosh, B. ( 1993). Manly work: Public art and masculinity in depression America. In B. Melosh (Ed.), Gender and American history since 1890 (pp. 155-181). London: Routledge.
72.
Metcalf, H. C., & Urwick, L. (Eds.). (1941). Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
73.
Miles, R.H. ( 2001). Beyond the age of Dilbert: Accelerating corporate transformations by rapidly engaging all employees. Organizational Dynamics , 29, 313-321.
74.
Morgan, G. ( 1993). Imaginization: The art of creative management. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
75.
Morgan, G. ( 1997). Images of organization (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE .
76.
Morgan, G., Frost, P.J., & Pondy, L.R. ( 1983). Organizational symbolism. In L. R. Pondy, P. J. Frost, G. Morgan, & T. C. Dandridge (Eds.), Organizational symbolism (pp. 3-35). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
77.
Naughton, M., & Laczniak, G.R. (1993). A theological context of work from the Catholic social encyclical tradition. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 981-994.
78.
Nissley, N. ( 2002). Tuning-in to organizational song as aesthetic discourse . Culture and Organization, 8(1), 51-68.
79.
Pearson, C., Andersson, L., & Wegner, J. ( 2001). When workers flout convention: A study of workplace incivility . Human Relations, 54, 1387-1419.
80.
Pfeffer, J., & Veiga, J.F. ( 1999). Putting people first for organizational success. Academy of Management Executive, 13(2), 37-48.
81.
Pierce, G.F. ( 2002). Don’t be a Dilbert. U.S. Catholic , 67(9), 36-37.
82.
Pink, S. ( 2007). Doing visual ethnography: Images, media and representation in research (2nd ed.). London : SAGE.
83.
Potkay, C.E., Potkay, C.R., Boynton, G.J., & Klingbeil, J.A. (1982). Perceptions of male and female comic strip characters using the adjective generation technique (AGT) . Sex Roles, 8(2), 185-200.
84.
Rayman, P.M. ( 2001). Beyond the bottom line: The search for dignity at work . New York, NY: Palgrave.
85.
Reitberger, R., & Fuchs, W. ( 1970). Comics: Anatomy of a mass medium. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
86.
Ridgeway, C.L., Boyle, E.H., Kuipers, K.J., & Robinson, D.T. (1998). How do status beliefs develop? The role of resources and interactional experience. American Sociological Review, 63, 331-350.
87.
Robinson, E.J., & White, D.M. ( 1963). Who reads the funnies - And why? In D. M. White & R. H. Abel (Eds.), The funnies: An American idiom (pp. 179-189). London: Free Press.
88.
Rodrigues, S.B., & Collinson, D.L. (1995). ‘Having fun’? Humor as resistance in Brazil. Organization Studies, 16, 739-768.
89.
Rousseau, D.M. ( 2007). A sticky, leveraging, and scalable strategy for high-quality connections between organizational practice and science. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1037-1042.
90.
Sandelands, L. ( 2009). The business of business is the human person: Lessons from the Catholic social tradition. Journal of Business Ethics , 85, 93-101.
91.
Sandelands, L.E., & Buckner, G.C. ( 1989). Of art and work: Aesthetic experience and the psychology of work feelings. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 11, pp. 105-131). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
92.
Sayer, A. ( 2007). Dignity at work: Broadening the agenda. Organization, 14, 565-581.
93.
Schein, E.H. ( 1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
94.
Spiegelman, M., Terwilliger, C., & Fearing, F. ( 1952). The content of comic strips: A study of a mass medium of communication. The Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 37-57.
95.
Spector, B. ( 2008). The man in the gray flannel suit in the executive suite: American corporate movies in the 1950s. Journal of Management History, 14, 87-104.
96.
Strati, A. ( 1996). Organizations viewed through the lens of aesthetics. Organization, 3, 209-218.
97.
Strati, A. ( 1999). Organization and aesthetics. London : SAGE.
98.
Streicher, L.H. ( 1967). On a theory of political caricature. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 9, 427-445.
99.
Sullivan, L. ( 2008). Calving and Hobbes to the rescue! The therapeutic uses of comic strips and cartoons. In L. C. Rubin (Ed.), Popular culture in counseling, psychotherapy, and play-based interventions (pp. 43-59). New York, NY: Springer.
100.
Taylor, S.S., & Hansen, H. ( 2005). Finding form: Looking at the field of organizational aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1211-1231.
101.
Time’s 25 most influential Americans. (1997, April 21). Time, 40-61.
102.
Weber, M. ( 1946/1921). Class, status and party. In H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds. and Trans.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 180-195). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
White, D.M., & Abel, R.H. ( 1963). The funnies: An American idiom. London : Free Press.
105.
Wilber, K. ( 1998). The marriage of sense and soul: Integrating science and religion. New York, NY: Random House .
106.
Zald, M.N. ( 1993). Organization studies as a scientific and humanistic enterprise: Toward a reconceptualization of the foundations of the field. Organization Science, 4, 513-528.
107.
Zald, M.N. ( 1996). More fragmentation? Unfinished business in linking the social sciences and the humanities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 251-261.
108.
Zald, M.N. ( 2002). Spinning disciplines: Critical management studies in the context of the transformation of management education. Organization, 9, 365-385.
