In the essay, it is first argued that Western societies are moving towards a society of networks, i.e. a society, in which the formal, vertically integrated organization that has dominated the 20th century is replaced or at least complemented by consciously created and goal directed networks of three and more organizations (whole networks). To substantiate this proposition we describe and analyze the development of organizational forms and the subsequent scientific efforts to grasp these developments theoretically and methodologically in the last 200-300 years. Second, the current state of network theory is briefly evaluated with regard to whole networks. In a third part, future research avenues concerning the development of theories that explain the coming into being, functioning, structure, governance and dissolution of whole networks (network theories) are discussed.
Alter, C., & Hage, J. (1993). Organizations working together. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Baum, J.A.C., & Ingram, P. (2002). Interorganizational learning and network organization: Toward a behavioral theory of the interfirm. In M. Augier & J. G. March (Eds.), The economics of choice, change, and organization: Essays in memory of Richard M. Cyert (pp. 191-218). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
3.
Bechky, B.A. (2006). Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role based coordination in temporary organizations. Organization Studies, 17, 3-21.
4.
Berghoff, H., & Sydow, J. (2007). Unternehmerische Netzwerke- Theoretische Konzepte und historische Erfahrungen. In idem (Eds.), Unternehmerische Netzwerke. Eine historische Organisations form mit Zukunft? (pp. 9-43). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer Verlag.
5.
Borgatti, S.P., & Foster, P.C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29, 991-1013.
6.
Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
7.
D'Aunno, T.A., & Zuckerman, H.S. (1987). A life cycle model of organizational federations: The case of hospitals. Academy of Management Review, 12, 534-545.
8.
Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1411-1454.
9.
Galaskiewicz, J. (2007). Has a network theory of organizational behaviour lived up to its promises? Management and Organization Review , 1, 1-18
10.
Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do inter-organizational networks come from ? American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1439-1493.
11.
Håkansson, H., & Ford, D. (2002). How should companies interact in business networks ? Journal of Business Research, 55, 133-139.
12.
Human, S.E., & Provan, K.G. (2000). Legitimacy building in the evolution of small firm multilateral networks: A comparative study of success and demise. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 327-365.
13.
Ibarra, H., Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2005). Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organization Science, 16, 359-371.
14.
Jones, C., Hesterly, W., & Borgatti, S. (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review , 22, 911-945.
15.
Jones, C., & Lichtenstein, B.B. (2008). Temporary inter-organizational projects: How temporal and social embeddedness enhance coordination and manage uncertainty. In S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham & P. Smith Ring (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (pp. 231-255). New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Kenis, P.N., & Provan, K.G. (2006). The control of public networks. International Public Management Journal, 9, 227-247.
17.
Kenis, P. & Provan, K.G. (forthcoming). Towards an exegenous theory of public network performance . Public Administration.
18.
Mayntz, R. (1993). Modernization and the logic of interorganizational networks. In J. Child, M. Crozier, & R. Mayntz (Eds.), Societal change between market and organization (pp. 3-18). Aldershot: Avebury.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs: New Jersey.
21.
Mintzberg, H., Lampel, J., Quinn, J.B., & Ghoshal, S. (2003). The strategy process: Concepts, contexts, cases (4th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
22.
Mulgan, G., & Briscoe, I. (1997). The society of networks. In G. Mulgan (Ed.), Life after Politics. New Thinking For the Twenty-First Century (pp. 339-345). London: Fontana Press.
23.
Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W.W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15, 5-21.
24.
Padgett, J.F., & Ansell, C.K. (1993). Robust action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434 . American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1259-1319.
25.
Perrow, C. (1991). A society of organizations. Theory and Society, 20, 725-762.
26.
Powell, W.W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy. Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295-336.
27.
Prahalad, C.K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2003). The new frontier of experience innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44, 12-18.
28.
Provan, K.G. (1993). Embeddedness, interdependence, and opportunism in organizational supplier-buyer networks. Journal of Management , 19, 841-856.
29.
Provan, K.G., Fish, A. & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33, 479-516.
30.
Provan, K.G., & Kenis, P.N. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 229-252.
31.
Provan, K.G., Kenis, P.N., & Human, S.E. (2008). Legitimacy building in organizational networks . In L. Blomgren Bingham & R. O'Leary (Eds.), Big ideas in collaborative public management (pp. 121-137). New York: M.E. Sharpe.
32.
Provan, K.G., & Milward, H.B. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems . Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 1-33.
33.
Ring, P.S., & van de Ven, A.H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19, 90-118.
34.
Rometsch, M., & Sydow, J. (2007). On identities of networks and organizations. In M. Kronberger & S. Gudergan (Eds.), Only connect: Neat words, networks and identities (19-47). Copenhagen: Liber.
35.
Sachs, J.D. (2008). Common wealth: Economics for a crowded planet . New York: Penguin.
36.
Salancik, G.R. (1995). Wanted: A good network theory of organization . Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 345-349.
37.
Simon, H.A. (1991). Organizations and markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 25-44.
38.
Spekman, R.E., Forbes, T.M., Isabella, L.A., & MacAvoy, T.C. (1998). Alliance management: A view from the past and a look to the future. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 747-772.
39.
Sydow, J. (2004). Network development by means of network evaluation? Explorative insights from a case in the financial services industry. Human Relations, 57, 201-220.
40.
Teubner, G. (1993). The "State" of private networks: The emerging legal regime of polycorporatism in Germany. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2, 553-575.
41.
Van Raaij, D.P.A.M. (2006). Norms network members use: An alternative perspective for indicating network success or failure. International Public Management Journal, 9, 249-270.
42.
Weber, M. (1972). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
43.
Whetten, D.A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14, 490-449.
