This article aims to expand the use of the coupling metaphor in organizational analysis by introducing a conceptual link between coupling and systems closure. The authors present a case study of Les Compagnons du Devoir (CdD), an ancient French Compagnonnage, or workers' brotherhood. This organization has managed to survive for at least 700 years; it is believed to be the oldest extant form of labor organization. The authors analyze the CdD as a highly institutionalized system displaying variable couplings and facing significant changes in its sociocultural environment. These features have been highlighted by recent attempts to internationalize the CdD. The authors distinguish between induced change and change by erosion and discuss how, given certain coupling configurations, an organization has persisted in an almost unchanged state while the world around it evolves.
Beekun, R., & Glick, W. (2002). Organization structure from a loose coupling perspective: A multidimensional approach. Decision Sciences, 32, 227-250.
2.
Bourgeois, L. (1979). Toward a method of middle range theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 4, 443-447.
3.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. Aldershot , UK: Ashgate.
4.
Crozier, M. (1963). Le phénomène bureaucratique. Paris: Seuil.
5.
Daft, R., & Buenger, V. (1991). Hitching a ride on a fast train to nowhere: The past and future of strategic management research. In J. Fredrickson (Ed.), Perspectives on strategic management . New York: Harper and Row.
6.
Das, T. (1983). Qualitative research in organizational behaviour . Journal of Management Studies, 20, 301-314.
7.
Delamare L.e Diest, F., & Winterton, J. (2005). What is competence?Human Resource Development International, 8, 27-46.
8.
Delbecq, A.L., & Van de Ven, A.H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7, 466-491.
9.
d'Iribarne, P. (1994). The honour principle in the "bureaucratic phenomenon."Organization Studies, 15, 81-97.
10.
Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. (2002). The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: Implications for productivity and innovation. Construction Management and Economics, 20, 621-631.
11.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
12.
Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organisations . New York: Free Press.
13.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
14.
Greil, A., & Rudy, D. (1984). Social cocoons: Encapsulation and identity transformation in organizations. Sociological Inquiry, 54, 260-278.
15.
Guédez, A. (1994). Compagnonnage et Apprentissage. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
16.
Guénon, R. (2004). Perspectives on initiation. New York: Sophia Perennis.
17.
Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relations in business networks. London: Routledge.
18.
Hautin, C., & Billier, D. (2000). Etre Compagnon. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
19.
Herzog, J.D., & Herzog, D.S. (1998, November). "We are not a school": Compagnonnage education as valorization of social capital. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association , Philadelphia.
20.
Isabella, L. (1990). Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organisational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 7-41.
21.
Kallinikos, J. (2003). Work, human agency and organizational forms: An anatomy of fragmentation. Organization Studies, 24, 595-618.
22.
Kieser, A. (1989). Organisational, institutional and societal evolution: Medieval craft guilds and the genesis of formal organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 540-564.
23.
Lee, T., Mitchell, T., & Sablynski, C. (1999). Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology, 1979-1999. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 55, 161-187.
24.
Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. London: Sage.
25.
Luhmann, N. (2001). Organisation und Entscheidung. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
26.
Lynham, S. (2000). Theory building in the human resources development profession. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11, 159-178.
27.
Malloch, H., & Redman, T. (2005). A French model of craft training: Its strategic relevance and recruitment issues for a UK firm. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 1303-1323.
28.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (Eds.). (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitesforlaget.
29.
Martin, P., & Turner, B. (1986). Grounded theory and organisational research. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 22, 141-157.
30.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31.
Montesquieu. (1748). De l'espirit des Lois. Paris: Société des Belles Lettres, 1958.
32.
Orton, J., & Weick, K. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualisation . Academy of Management Review, 15, 203-223.
33.
Ouchi, W., & Price, R. (1978). Hierarchies, clans, and theory Z: A new perspective on organization development. Organizational Dynamics, 7, 24-44.
34.
Pettigrew, A. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1, 267-292.
35.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organisations. New York: Harper and Row.
36.
Spender, J.C., & Grevesen, W. (1999). The multinational enterprise as a loosely coupled system: The global integration-local responsiveness dilemma. Managerial Finance, 25, 63-84.
37.
Staber, U., & Sydow, J. (2002). Organizational adaptive capacity: A structuration perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11, 408-424.
38.
Stinchcombe, A.L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (p. 142-193)). Chicago: Rand McNally.
39.
Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40.
Trist, E.L., & Bamforth, K.W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4, 3-38.
41.
Truant, C.M. (1994). The rites of labour: Brotherhoods of Compagnonnage in old and new regime France. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42.
Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems . Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.
43.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
