This study investigates the appropriateness of using publication of an article in a top (specifically, top five) management journal as a proxy for its quality. Social Science Citation Index citation counts were collected over 7-year event windows for articles published in 34 management journals in 1993 and 1996. Overall, the authors found that articles published in the five journals most often considered to be the top ones in management tend to be cited more often than ones published in the other journals. Far more important, however, across three different criteria for placing articles into top versus non-top categories, there were substantial classification errors from using journal ranking as a proxy for quality. This finding suggests that both administrators and the management discipline will be well served by efforts to evaluate each article on its own merits rather than abdicate this responsibility by using journal ranking as a proxy for quality.
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB International). (2003, March/April). Ranking the research. Biz Ed, p. 11.
2.
Beamish, P. (2000). Knowledge creators or knowledge retailers? Business school research in Canada. Proceedings of the 2000 ASAC Conference, pp. 1-10.
3.
Bennis, W., & O'Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96-106.
4.
Bowman, E., & Helfat, C. (2001). Does corporate strategy matter?Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 1-23.
5.
Coe, R., & Weinstock, I. (1969). Evaluating journal publication: Perceptions versus reality. AACSB Bulletin, 6(1), 23-37.
6.
Coe, R., & Weinstock, I. (1984). Evaluating the management journals: A second look . Academy of Management Journal, 27(3), 660-666.
7.
Extejt, M., & Smith, J. (1990). The behavioral sciences and management: An evaluation of relevant journals. Journal of Management, 16(3), 539-551.
8.
Franke, R., Edlund, T., & Oster, F. (1990). The development of strategic management: Journal quality and article impact. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 243-253.
9.
Gass, S. (2001). Model world: When is a number a number?Interfaces, 31(5), 93-103.
10.
Gomez-Mejia, L., & Balkin, D. (1992). Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35(5), 921-955.
11.
Haddad, K. (1998). The time requirements of publishing in finance journals: A survey of experienced authors. Financial Practice and Education, 8(2), 70-73.
12.
Jarley, P., Chandler, T., & Faulk, L. (1998). Are we playing the same game? Publishing task environments and research productivity among management specialists. Human Relations, 51(6), 799-824.
13.
Johnson, J., & Podsakoff, P. (1994). Journals of influence in the field of management: An analysis using Salancik's index in a dependency network. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1392-1407.
14.
MacMillan, I. (1989). Toward a forum for entrepreneurship scholars. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(5), 289-290.
15.
MacMillan, I. (1991). The emerging forum for business policy scholars . Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 161-165.
16.
MacMillan, I. (1993). The emerging forum for entrepreneurship scholars . Journal of Business Venturing, 8(5), 377-381.
17.
MacMillan, I., & Stern, I. (1987). Delineating a forum for business policy scholars . Strategic Management Journal, 8(2), 183-186.
18.
McRoberts, M.H., & McRoberts, B.R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 40(5), 342-349.
19.
Morris, J., Cudd, R., & Crain, J. (1990). A study of the potential bias in accounting journal ratings: Implications for promotion and tenure decisions. Accounting Educators' Journal, pp. 46-55.
20.
Park, S., & Gordon, M. (1996). Publication records and tenure decisions in the field of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal , 17(2), 109-128.
21.
Pfeffer, I., Leong, A., & Strehl, K. (1977). Paradigm development and particularism: Journal publication in three scientific disciplines. Social Forces , 55(4), 938-951.
22.
Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 599-620.
23.
Phene, A., & Guisinger, S. (1998). The stature of the Journal of International Business Studies. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), 621-632.
24.
Podsakoff, M., MacKenzie, S., Bachrach, D., & Podsakoff, N. (2005). The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 473-488.
25.
Porter, M. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.
26.
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
27.
Reinstein, A., & Hasselback, J. (1997). A literature review of articles assessing the productivity of accounting faculty members. Journal of Accounting Education, 15(1), 425-455.
28.
Salancik, G. (1986). An index of subgroup influence in dependency networks . Administrative Science Quarterly,31(2), 194-211.
29.
Sharplin, A., & Mabry, R. (1985). The relative importance of journals used in management research: An alternative ranking. Human Relations, 38(2), 139-149.
30.
Smith, S. (2004). Is an article in a top journal a top article?Financial Management, 33(4), 133-149.
31.
Stahl, M., Leap, T., & Wei, Z. (1988). Publication in leading management journals as a measure of institutional research productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 707-720.
32.
Swanson, E. (2004). Publishing in the majors: A comparison of accounting, finance, management, and marketing. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(1), 223-255.
33.
Tahai, A., & Meyer, M. (1999). A revealed preference study of management journals' direct influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20(3), 279-296.
34.
Trieschmann, J., Dennis, A., Northcraft, G., & Niemi, A. (2000). Serving multiple constituencies in business schools: M.B.A. program versus research performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1130-1141.
35.
Van Fleet, D., McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). A theoretical and empirical analysis of journal rankings: The case of formal lists. Journal of Management , 26(5), 839-861.
36.
Vincent, A., & Ross, D. (2000). On impact of faculty research— Impact of citation analysis. Journal of Applied Business Research, 16(2), 1-14.
37.
Whittington, G. (1997). The 1996 Research Assessment Exercise. British Accounting Review, 29(2), 181-197.
