Firm-idiosyncratic resources are at the heart of the resource-based view. A hallmark of empirical research findings supporting or falsifying a theory is generalizability. Generalizability demands that research findings are not idiosyncratic to the firm or sample of firms studied. The author develops a typology for mapping the apparently paradoxical relationship between resource idiosyncrasy and generalizability of research findings. Implications for empirical work are then deduced to advance our understanding of the resource-based “view” as a theory.
Amit, R., & Shoemaker, P. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33-46.
2.
Bagozzi, R. P. (1980). Causal models in marketing. New York: John Wiley.
3.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
4.
Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 41-56.
5.
Barney, J. B., & Arikan, A. (2001). The resource-based view: Origins and implications. In M. Hitt, F. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management (pp. 124-188). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
6.
Barney, J. B., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27, 625-642.
7.
Calder, B. J., Phillips, L. W., & Tybott, A. M. (1982). The concept of external validity. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 240-244.
8.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
9.
Campbell-Hunt, C. (2000). What have we learned about generic competitive strategy? A meta-analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 127-154.
10.
Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386-405.
11.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Design and analysis of quasi experiments for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
12.
Davenport, T. H., & Probst, G. J. B. (2002). Knowledge management case book. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley.
13.
Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage: Reply. Management Science, 35, 1504-1512.
14.
Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they?Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105-1121.
15.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
16.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Brown, S. L. (1998). Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
17.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Brown, S. L. (1999). Patching: Restitching business portfolios in dynamic markets. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 72-82.
18.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine Press.
19.
Grant, R. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-123.
20.
Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83-103.
21.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Co-ordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502-519.
22.
Larsson, R. (1993). Case survey methodology: Quantitative analysis of patterns across case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1515-1546.
23.
March, J. G., Sproull, L. S., & Tamuz, M. (1991). Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organization Science, 2(1), 1-13.
24.
Miles, M. B. (1979). Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: The problem of analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 590-601.
25.
Miles, M. B., & Hubermann, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. (1996). The resource-based view in two environments. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 519-544
27.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). An emerging strategy of direct research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 508-589.
28.
Penrose, E. (1959). Theory of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley.
29.
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179-191.
30.
Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Tüebingen, Germany: Hutchinson.
31.
Popper, K. (1972). The logic of scientific discovery. Tüebingen, Germany: Hutchinson.
32.
Porter, M. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
33.
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.
34.
Porter, M. (1996). What is strategy?Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61-78.
35.
Porter, M., & Siggelkow, N. (2001, October). Contextuality within activity systems. Paper presented at the 21st annual conference of the Strategic Management Society, San Francisco.
36.
Powell, T. C. (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 15-38.
37.
Powell, T. C. (2001). Competitive advantage: Logical and philosophical considerations. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 875-888.
38.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
39.
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research?Academy of Management Review, 26, 22-40.
40.
Ray, G., Barney, J. B., & Muhanna, W. (2004). Capabilities, business processes and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 23-37.
41.
Reason, P., & Rowan, J. (1981). Human inquiry: A sourcebook for new paradigm research. London: Sage.
42.
Rouse, M., & Daellenbach, U. (1999). Rethinking research methods for the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 487-494.
43.
Rouse, M., & Daellenbach, U. (2002). More thinking on research methods for the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 963-967.
44.
Scandura, T. A., & Williams, E. A. (2000). Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1248-1264.
45.
Scott-Poole, M., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build organization and management theories. Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 562-578.
46.
Spender, J. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 45-62.
47.
Stake, R. E. (1988). Case study methods in educational research: Seeking sweet waters. In R. M. Jaeger (Ed.), Complementary methods for research in education (pp. 253-278). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
48.
Stake, R. E. (1994). The art of case study research. London: Sage.
49.
Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533.
50.
Tsoukas, H. (1989). The validity of ideographic research explanations. Academy of Management Review, 14, 551-561.
51.
van Maanen, J. (1979). Reclaiming qualitative methods for organizational research: A preface. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 520-526.
52.
Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: Research guidelines for different theory-building research methods and operations research. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361-385.
53.
Weick, K. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14, 516-531.
54.
Weick, K. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 385-391.
55.
Wells, W. D. (2001). The perils of N=1. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 494-498.
56.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
57.
Wernerfelt, B. (1995). The resource based view of the firm: Ten years after. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 246-250.
58.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.
59.
Zollo, M., & Winter, S.2000. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-352.
