This essay seeks to demonstrate that the spread of utilitarian rationalism within developed Western societies has had two crucial consequences: (a) gratuitousness and expressiveness, as irrepressible human needs, have been crushed “at the door” of utilitarian organizations but then have surreptitiously re-entered through the window, camouflaging themselves in forms that render them difficult to recognize and enable them to evade the mechanisms of social censorship that protect the image of organizations as the uncontested domain of instrumental rationality, and (b) the expert knowledge produced about organizations since the beginning of the last century has for almost 80 years ignored the expressive dimension of organizational life. From this point of view, the scientific community of organizational scholars has displayed an astonishing sort of collective repression. The forms taken by this repression and the expedients used to reduce the cognitive dissonance inevitably provoked by evidence of what has been repressed are examined.
Blau, P. M. (1955). The dynamics of bureaucracy. New York: John Wiley.
2.
Broms, H., & Gahmberg, H. (1983). Communication to self in organizations and cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 482-495.
3.
Crozier, M. (1963). Le phénomène bureaucratique [The bureaucratic phenomenon]. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
4.
Cummings, L. L., & Frost, P. J. (Eds.). (1995). Publishing in the organizational sciences. London: Sage.
5.
Dalton, M. (1959). Men who manage. New York: John Wiley.
6.
Dandridge, T. C., Mitroff, I., & Joyce, W. F. (1980). Organizational symbolism: A topic to expand organizational analysis. Academy of Management Review, 1, 77-82.
7.
Dougherty, D., & Kunda, G. (1990). Photograph analysis: A method to capture organizational belief systems. In P. Gagliardi (Ed.), Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape, (pp. 185-206). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
8.
Duby, G. (1986). Il sogno della storia [The dream of history]. Milan, Italy: Garzanti.
9.
Gagliardi, P. (1986). The creation and change of organizational cultures: A conceptual framework. Organization Studies, 2, 117-134.
10.
Gagliardi, P. (1990). Artifacts as pathways and remains of organizational life. In P. Gagliardi (Ed.), Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape (pp. 3-38). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
11.
Gagliardi, P. (1996). Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In S. R. Clegget al. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 565-580). London: Sage.
12.
Gouldner, A. W. (1954). Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. New York: Free Press.
13.
Martin, J., & Siehl, C. (1983, Autumn). Organizational culture and counterculture: An uneasy symbiosis. Organizational Dynamics, 52-64.
14.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 2, 340-363.
15.
Pondy, L. R., Frost, P. J., Morgan, G., and Drandidge, T. (Eds.). (1983). Organizational symbolism. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
16.
Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). New institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Selznick, P. (1949) TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. Evanston, IL: Harper & Row.
19.
Turner, B. A. (1990). The rise of organizational symbolism. In J. Hassard & D. Pym (Eds.), The theory and philosophy of organization. Critical issues and new perspectives. London: Routledge.
20.
Witkin, R. W. (1974). The intelligence of feeling. London: Heinemann.
21.
Wright, J. P. (1979). On a clear day you can see General Motors. Grosse Point, MI: Wright Enterprises.
