Whereas films are widely used as instructional tools, applications tend to be under-theorized, limited to illustrating ideas and motivating students. Our perspective draws on narrative theory, organizational representation, and processual theory, to develop an approach to the critical interrogation of film as thesis. Film selection criteria are identified, and two films are considered: 12 Angry Men and Thirteen Days. These films advance a thesis concerning interpersonal influence and decision making. Research-based accounts of influence are decontextualized, dyadic, episodic, apolitical, and practical. These films depict interpersonal influence as a multi-layered phenomenon, shaped by contextual, temporal, processual, social, political and emotional factors. Rather than presenting a trivialized, sensationalized, glamorous account, these films demonstrate the complex integration of issues typically covered discretely by mainstream texts.
Allison, G. T. (1969). Conceptual models and the Cuban Missile Crisis. The American Political Science Review, 63(3), 689-718.
2.
Baker, H. E. (1993). Wax on-wax off: French and Raven at the movies. Journal of Management Education, 17(5), 17-29.
3.
Boje, D.M. (1991). The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 106-126.
4.
Boje, D. M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational and communication research. London: Sage.
5.
Buchanan, D. A. (1999). The logic of political action: An experiment with the epistemology of the particular. British Journal of Management, 10, 73-88.
6.
Burnett, D. G. (2001). A trial by jury. New York: Knopf.
7.
Burrell, G. (1998). Pandemonium: Towards a retro-theory of organizationsLondon: Sage.
8.
Butler, R. (1997). Stories and experiments in social inquiry. Organization Studies, 12(6), 927-948.
9.
Champoux, J. E. (1999). Film as a teaching resource. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8(2), 206-217.
10.
Champoux, J. E. (2001a). Management: Using film to visualize principles and practices. New York: South-Western College Publishing.
11.
Champoux, J. E. (2001b). Organizational behaviour: Using film to visualize principles and practices. New York: South-Western College Publishing.
12.
Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13.
Comer, D. R. (2000). Not just a Mickey Mouse exercise: Using Disney’s The Lion King to teach leadership. Journal of Management Education, 25(4), 430-436.
14.
Comer, D. R., & Cooper, E. A. (1998). Michael Crichton’s Disclosure as a teaching tool. Journal of Management Education, 22(2), 227-241.
15.
Cronenberg, D. (Director). (1999). eXistenZ (Motion picture). United States: Alliance Films.
16.
Czarniawska, B. (1998). A narrative approach to organization studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Czarniawska, B. (1999). Writing management: Organization theory as a literary genre. UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
Czarniawska, B., & de Monthoux, P. G. (Eds.). (1994). Good novels, better management: Reading organizational realities in fiction. Reading, UK: Harwood Academic Publishers.
19.
Dawson, P. (1994). Organizational change: A processual approach. London: Paul Chapman.
20.
Dawson, P. (1996). Technology and quality: Change in the work-place. London: International Thomson.
21.
Dawson, P. (2003). Reshaping change: A processual approach. London: Routledge.
22.
Donaldson, R. (Director). (2001). Thirteen Days (Motion picture). United States: New Line Home Entertainment.
23.
Dyer, W. G., & Wilkins, A. L. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate a better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review, 16, 613-619.
24.
Foreman, J., & Thatchenkery, T. J. (1996). Filmic representations for organizational analysis: The characterization of a transplant organization in the film Rising Sun. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9(3), 44-61.
25.
Gabriel, Y. (1998). The use of stories. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide (pp. 135-160). London: Sage.
26.
Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in organizations: Facts, fictions and fantasies. UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
Goldratt, E., & Cox, J. (1993). The goal (2nd ed.). Aldershot, UK: Gower.
28.
Grottola, M. (1994). Teaching the social geometry of management with literary narrative. Journal of Management Education, 18(1), 125-128.
29.
Harper, D. (2000). Reimagining visual methods: Galileo to Neuromancer. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 717-732). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Harrington, K. V., & Griffin, R. W. (1990). Ripley, Burke, Gorman and friends: Using the film Aliens to teach leadership and power. Journal of Management Education, 14(3), 79-86.
31.
Hassard, J., & Holliday, R. (Eds.). (1998). Organization representation: Work and organization in popular culture. London: Sage.
32.
Huczynski, A. A. (1994). Teaching influencing and motivation strategies using The Magnificent Seven. Journal of Management Education, 18(3), 273-278.
33.
Huczynski, A. A., & Buchanan, D. A. (2001). Organizational behaviour: An introductory text. Harlow Essex, UK: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
34.
Kapur, S. (Director). (1994). Bandit Queen (Motion picture). United States: Hallmark Home Entertainment.
35.
Kapur, S. (Director). (1998). Elizabeth (Motion picture). United States: Gramercy Pictures.
36.
Kaufman, P. (Director). (1993). Rising Sun (Motion picture). United States: Twentieth Century Fox.
37.
Kemske, F. (1996). Human resources: A business novel. London: Nicholas Brealey.
38.
Kennedy, R. F. (1968). Thirteen days: The Cuban Missile Crisis October 1962. London: Macmillan.
39.
Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., Swaffin-Smith, C., & Wilkinson, I. (1984). Patterns of managerial influence: Shotgun managers, tacticians and bystanders. Organizational Dynamics, 12 (Winter), 58-76.
40.
Knights, D., & Willmott, H. (1999). Management lives: Power and identity in work organizations. London: Sage.
41.
Kressel, N. J., & Kressel, D. F. (2001). Stack and sway: The new science of jury consulting. New York: Westview.
42.
Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691-710.
43.
Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 34(4), 79-88.
44.
Lumet, S. (Director). (1957). 12 Angry Men (Motion picture). United States: MGM/UA Studios.
45.
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1976). Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
46.
Michaelson, L. K., & Schultheiss, E. E. (1988). Bronson, Brenner and McQueen: Do they have something to teach us about influencing?Organizational Behaviour Teaching Review, 12(4), 144-147.
47.
Mitchell, J. C. (1983). Case and situational analysis. Sociological Review, 31(2), 187-211.
48.
Mullins, L. J. (2002). Management and organisational behaviour. Harlow Essex, UK: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
49.
Pentland, B. T. (1999). Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 711-724.
50.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1973). The politics of organizational decision-making. London: Tavistock.
51.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1985). The awakening giant: Continuity and change in ICI. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
52.
Pettigrew, A. M., Ferlie, E., & McKee, L. (1992). Shaping strategic change: Making change in large organizations-The case of the national health service. London: Sage.
53.
Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W., & Cameron, K. S. (2001). Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 697-713.
54.
Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
55.
Puffer, S. M. (1991). Managerial insights from literature. Kent, UK: PWS.
56.
Putnam, L. L., Phillips, N., & Chapman, P. (1996). Metaphors of communication and organization. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 375-408). London: Sage.
57.
Rappaport, A., & Cawelti, G. S. (1998). Cinematography and case videos: Some observations on selection and teaching. Journal of Management Education, 22(1), 104-112.
58.
Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behaviour (9th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
59.
Serey, T. T. (1992). Carpe diem: Lessons about organization and management from Dead Poets Society. Journal of Management Education, 16(3), 374-381.
60.
Stake, R.E. (1994). Case studies. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research(pp.236-247). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
61.
Stake, R.E. (2000). Case studies. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 435-454). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
62.
Taylor, S. S., Fisher, D., & Dufresne, R. (2002). The aesthetics of management storytelling: A key to organizational learning. Management Learning, 33(3), 313-330.
63.
Thompson, J., & McGivern, J. (1996). Parody, process and practice. Management Learning, 27(1), 21-35.
64.
Tsoukas, H. (1989). The validity of idiographic research explanations. Academy of Management Review, 14, 551-561.
65.
Wachowski, A. (Writer/Director) & Wachowski, L. (Writer/Director). (1999). Matrix (Motion picture). United States: Warner Brothers.
66.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67.
Williams, G. A., & Miller, R. B. (2002). Change the way you persuade. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 65-73.
68.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69.
Zemeckis, R. (Director). (1997). Contact (Motion picture). United States: South Side Amusement Company/Warner Brothers.
