Work and leisure are commonly viewed as dichotomous and antithetical. The authors argue that this conceptual duality is unreflective, confounding the meaning of each term. They suggest that work and leisure are complements that in their highest states share core elements and are best understood in dynamic relation to each other. Their purpose in this essay is to better understand work by learning about its complement. The authors characterize leisure as the experiential quality of one's time when one engages voluntarily and intentionally in awareness-expanding inquiry, which in turn generates ongoing, transforming development throughout adulthood. Leisure is intrinsically rewarding, facilitating personal and organizational transformations that increase extrinsic economic value. In response to an increasingly dominant work ethic, the authors advocate that leisure receive the same level of scrutiny and respect that we as management scholars naturally give to work. Cultivating true leisure, they conclude, is more demanding than work itself.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, C., & Langer, E. (Eds.). (1990). Higher stages of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Allen, R. T. (1989). Leisure: The purpose of life and the nature of philosophy. In T. Winnifrith & C. Barrett (Eds.), The philosophy of leisure (pp. 20-33). New York: St. Martin's.
3.
Andrew, E. (1981). Closing the iron cage: The scientific management of work and leisure. Montreal, Canada: Black Rose Books.
4.
Argyle, M. (1996). The social psychology of leisure. London: Penguin.
5.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Aristotle. (2000). Nichomachean ethics (R. Crisp, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published c. 300 BC)
7.
Bacharach, S., Bamberger, P., & McKinney, V. (2000). Boundary management tactics and logics of action: The case of peer-support providers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 704-736.
8.
Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18, 93-117.
9.
Barrett, C. (1989). The concept of leisure: Idea and ideal. In T. Winnifrith & C. Barrett (Eds.), The philosophy of leisure (pp. 9-19). New York: St. Martin's.
10.
Berger, B. (1963). The sociology of leisure. In E. O. Smigel (Ed.), Work and leisure: A contemporary social problem (pp. 21-40). New Haven, CT: College and University Press.
11.
Bird, F., & Water, J. (1989). The moral muteness of managers. California Management Review, 32(1), 73-88.
12.
Caillois, R. (1961). Man, play, and games (M. Barash, Trans.). New York: Schocken Books. (Original work published 1958)
13.
Ciulla, J. B. (2000). The working life: The promise and betrayal of modern life. New York: Times Books.
14.
Coalter, F. (Ed.). (1989). Freedom and constraint: The paradoxes of leisure. London: Routledge.
15.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimum experience. New York: Harper Collins.
17.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 815-822.
18.
Davies, M. (1989). Another way of being: Leisure and the possibility of privacy. The philosophy of leisure. New York: St. Martins.
19.
De Grazia, S. (1962). Of time, work, and leisure. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
20.
DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in insitutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3-21). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.
21.
Dumazedier, J. (1967). Toward a society of leisure (S. E. McClure, Trans.). Toronto, Canada: Collier-Macmillan. (Original work published 1962)
22.
Dumazedier, J. (1975). The conception of changes in leisure and education. Society and Leisure, 7(3), 57-62.
23.
Fisher, D., Rooke, D., & Torbert, W. (2001). Personal and organizational transformation: Through action inquiry. Boston: Edge\Work.
24.
Foster, P., & Torbert, W. (2002). Transformational action learning and institutional change processes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
25.
Foster, R. (1978). Celebration of discipline. New York: Harper & Row.
26.
Fraser, J. A. (2001). White collar sweatshop: The deterioration of work and its rewards in corporate America. New York: Norton.
27.
Friedson, E. (1990). Labors of love in theory and practice: A prospectus. In K. Erikson & S. P. Vallas (Eds.), The nature of work: Sociological perspectives (pp. 149-161). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28.
Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Damon, W. (2001). Good work: When excellence and ethics meet. New York: Basic Books.
29.
Glynn, M. A. (1994). Effects of work and play task labels on information processing, judgments, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 34-45.
30.
Glynn, M. A., & Barr, P. S. (2001, August). Adaptive play: On counterbalancing strategic intent with foolishness. Paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting, Washington, D.C.
31.
Hartwell, J., & Torbert, W. (1999). A group interview with Andy Wilson, founder and CEO of Boston Duck Tours, Entrepreneur of the Year; and Analysis of a group interview with Andy Wilson: An illustration of interweaving first-, second-, and third-person research/practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8, 191-204.
32.
Heron, J. (1996). Cooperative inquiry. London: Sage.
33.
Hochschild, A. (1997). The time bind. Markham, Canada: Fitzhery & Whiteside.
34.
Huizinga, J. (1950). Homo ludens. Boston: Beacon.
35.
Hunnicutt, B. K. (1988). Work, leisure, and labor supply: An analysis of the 1980 U.S. census data. International Review of Modern Sociology, 18(1), 31-55.
36.
Jacobs, J. A., & Gerson, K. (2001). Overworked individuals or overworked families? Explaining trends in work, leisure, and family time. Work and Occupations, 28(1), 40-63.
37.
Jahoda, M., Lazarfeld, P. F., & Zeisel, H. (1971). Marienthal: The sociography of an unemployed community (J. Reginall & T. Elsaesser, Trans.). Chicago: Aldine. (Original work published 1933)
38.
Jaques, E. (1982). The form of time. New York: Crane Russak.
39.
Juster, F. T. (1986, 1st quarter). Preferences for work and leisure. Economic Outlook USA (Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, the University of Michigan), 15-17.
40.
Kaplan, M. (1975). Leisure: Theory and policy. New York: John Wiley.
41.
Karlsson, J. C. (1995). The concept of work on the rack: Critique and suggestions. In R. L. Simpson & I. H. Simpson (Eds.), Research in the sociology of work: The meaning of work (pp. 1-14). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
42.
Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
Kelly, J. R., & Godbey, G. (1992). The sociology of leisure. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
44.
Mainemelis, C. (2001). When the muse takes it all: A model for the experience of timelessness in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 548-565.
45.
Marcuse, H. (1955). Eros and civilization. Boston: Beacon.
46.
Marshall, J. (2001). Self-reflective inquiry practices. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 433-439). London: Sage.
47.
Meilaender, G. C. (Ed.). (2000). Working: Its meaning and its limits. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
48.
Miller, K. A., & Kohn, M. L. (1983). The reciprocal effects of job conditions and the intellectuality of leisure-time activities. In M. L. Kohn & C. Schooler (Eds.), Work and personality: An inquiry into the impact of social stratification(pp. 217-241). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
49.
Needleman, J. (1980). Lost Christianity. New York: Doubleday.
50.
Neulinger, J. (1981). To leisure: An introduction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
51.
Parker, S. (1983). Leisure and work. London: George Allen & Unwin.
52.
Pascarella, P. (1984). The new achievers: Creating a modern work ethic. New York: Free Press.
53.
Pieper, J. (1952). Leisure: The basis of culture (A. Dru, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.
54.
Posner, B. Z. (2002). Editor's introduction. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11, 304.
55.
Pronovost, G. (1998). The sociology of leisure. Current Sociology, 46(3).
56.
Quarrick, G. (1989). Our sweetest hours: Recreation and the state of mental absorption. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
57.
Ransome, P. (1996). The work paradigm. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
58.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59.
Riesman, D. (1950). The lonely crowd. New York: Doubleday.
60.
Rigby, B. (1989). French intellectuals and leisure: The case of Emmanuel Mounier. In T. Winnifrith & C. Barrett (Eds.), The philosophy of leisure (pp. 160-171). New York: St. Martin's.
61.
Robinson, J., & Godbey, G. (1997). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
62.
Rojek, C. (1985). Capitalism and leisure theory. London: Tavistock.
63.
Rojek, C. (Ed.). (1989). Leisure for leisure: Critical essays. New York: Routledge.
64.
Rojek, C. (2000). Leisure and the rich today: Veblen's thesis after a century. Leisure Studies, 19, 1-15.
65.
Rooke, D., & Torbert, W. (1998). Organizational transformation as a function of CEOs' developmental stage. Organizational Development Journal, 16(1), 11-28.
66.
Rose, M. (1985). Re-working the work ethic. New York: Schoken.
67.
Roy, D. (1959). Banana time: Job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organization, 18, 158-168.
68.
Runkel, P., Harrison, R., & Runkel, M. (1969). The changing college classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
69.
Saunders, D. M., & Turner, D. E. (1987). Gambling and leisure: The case of racing. Leisure Studies, 6(3), 281-299.
70.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
71.
Schor, J. B. (1998). The overspent American: Upscaling, down-shifting, and the new consumer. New York: Basic Books.
72.
Schor, J. B. (1991). The overworked American. New York: Basic Books.
73.
Sherman, F., & Torbert, W. (Eds.) (2000). Transforming social inquiry, transforming social action. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
74.
Snape, R. (1992). Betting, billiards and smoking: Leisure in public libraries. Leisure Studies, 11(3), 187-199.
75.
Stebbins, R. A. (1992). Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queens University Press.
76.
Stebbins, R. A. (1997). Serious leisure and well being. In J. T. Haworth (Ed.), Work, leisure, and well-being (pp. 117-130). London: Routledge.
77.
Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
78.
Torbert, W. (1972). Learning from experience: Toward consciousness. New York: Columbia University Press.
79.
Torbert, W. (1987). Managing the corporate dream: Restructuring for long-term success. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
80.
Torbert, W. (1991). The power of balance: Transforming self, society, and scientific inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
81.
Torbert, W. (1996). The “chaotic” action awareness of tranformational leaders. International Journal of Public Administration, 19(6), 911-939.
82.
Torbert, W., & Rogers. (1973). Being for the most part puppets. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
83.
Varela, F., & Shear, J. (1999). The view from within: First-person approaches to the study of consciousness. Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic.
84.
Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class. London: Allen & Unwin.
85.
Velmans, M. (2000). Understanding consciousness. London: Routlege.
86.
Wilber, K. (1998). The marriage of sense and soul: Integrating science and religion. New York: Random House.
87.
Wilber, K. (2000). Integral psychology: Consciousness, spirit, psychology, therapy. Boston: Shambhala.
88.
Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
