How do field researchers make sense of voluminous process data, much of it qualitative data? When this author began to analyze her dissertation data in 1992, she did not have a clear answer to this question. However, with several articles from this research safely in publication, she took the opportunity to make sense of her 7-year data analysis experience. Her sensemaking of process data analysis is broken down into three phases and compared to the data analysis schema of Langley (1999). The role of outside influences, which aided movement through the phases, is highlighted at the end of the article. Finally, a model of this overall process—from process data to publication—is articulated. The article does not provide a definitive answer to the above question, but it is hoped that it will provide clues for researchers searching to answer that question themselves.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aharoni, Y.
(1966). The foreign investment decision process. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School Publications.
2.
Bourgeois, L. J.
, & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1988). Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Science, 34(7), 816-835.
3.
Dutton, J. E.
(1988). Perspectives on strategic issue processing: Insights from a case study. In R. Lamb & P. Shrivastava (Eds.), Advances in strategic management (Vol. 5, pp. 223-244). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
4.
Dutton, J. E.
, & Dukerich, J. M. (1991). Keeping an eye in the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517-554.
5.
Eisenhardt, K. M.
(1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
6.
Eisenhardt, K. M.
, & Bourgeois, L. J. (1988). Politics in strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 737-770.
7.
Feldman, M. S.
(1995). Strategies for interpreting qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Gersick, C.
(1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
9.
Gioia, D. A.
, & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategy change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 433-448.
10.
Glaser, B.
, & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
11.
Golden-Biddle, K.
, & Locke, K. D. (1997). Composing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Hart, S. L.
(1992). An integrative framework for strategy-making processes. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 327-357.
13.
Jelinek, M.
, & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). The innovation marathon. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
14.
Johanson, J.
, & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 23-32.
15.
Johanson, J.
, & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The internationalization of the firms. Journal of Management Studies, 12(3), 305-322.
16.
Langley, A.
(1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691-710.
17.
Luostarinen, R.
(1980). Internationalization of the firm (2nd ed.). Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki School of Economics.
18.
Melin, L.
(1992). Internationalization as a strategy process. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 99-118.
19.
Miles, M. B.
, & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: Asourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Mintzberg, H.
(1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934-948.
21.
Mintzberg, H.
, & McHugh, A. (1985). Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 160-197.
22.
Pettigrew, A. M.
(1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267-292.
23.
Rousseau, D.
(1995). Publishing from a reviewer’s perspective. In L. L. Cummings & P. J. Frost (Eds.), Publishing in the organization sciences (pp. 151-163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Smith, A. D.
, & Zeithaml, C. (1999). The intervening hand: Contemporary international expansion processes of the regional Bell operating companies. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8(10), 34-64.
25.
Stake, R. E.
(1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236-247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Strauss, A.
(1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Sutton, R.
(1997). The virtues of “closet” qualitative research. Organization Science, 8, 97-106.
28.
Van de Ven, A. H.
(1992). Suggestions for studying process research: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 169-188.
29.
Van Maanen, J.
(1982). Introduction. In J. Van Maanen, J. M. Dabbs Jr., & R. F. Faulkner (Eds.), Varieties of qualitative research (pp. 11-29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Van Maanen, J.
(1988). Tales of the field. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Weick, K. E.
(1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
32.
Weick, K. E.
(1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Yin, R. K.
(1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
