Aldrich, H.
(1988). Paradigm warriors: Donaldson versus the critics of organization theory. Organization Studies, 9(1), 19-25.
2.
Boje, D. M.
, & Dennehy, R. F. (1994). America's revolution against exploitation: The story of postmodern management. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
3.
Burrell, G.
(1984). Sex and organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 5(2), 97-118.
4.
Burrell, G.
(1994). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: The contribution of Jürgen Habermas. Organization Studies, 15(1), 1-19.
5.
Burrell, G.
, & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.
6.
Clegg, S. R.
, & Hardy, C. (1996). Organization, organizations and organizing. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 1-28). London: Sage.
7.
Cooper, R.
, & Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 9, 91-112.
8.
DiMaggio, P. J.
(1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3-22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
9.
Donaldson, L.
(1988). In successful defence of organization theory: A routing of the critics. Organization Studies, 9(1), 28-32.
10.
Douglas, M.
(1973). Natural symbols. New York: Pantheon.
11.
Douglas, M.
, & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
Fox, A.
(1973). Industrial relations: A social critique of pluralist ideology. In J. Child (Ed.), Man and organization (pp. 185-233). London: Allen and Unwin.
13.
Gioia, D. A.
, & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584-602.
14.
Hassard, J.
(1988). Overcoming hermeticism in organization theory: An alternative to paradigm incommensurability. Human Relations, 41(3), 247-259.
15.
Hassard, J.
(1991). Multiple paradigms and organizational analysis: A case study. Organization Studies, 12(2), 275-299.
16.
Hassard, J.
(1994). Postmodern organizational analysis: Toward a conceptual framework. Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 303-324.
17.
Jackson, N.
, & Carter, P. (1991). In defence of paradigm incommensurability. Organization Studies, 12(1),109-127.
18.
Jackson, N.
, & Carter, P. (1993). "Paradigm wars": A response to Hugh Willmott. Organization Studies, 14(5), 721-725.
19.
Jeffcutt, P.
(1994). From interpretation to representation in organizational analysis: Postmodernism, ethnography and organizational symbolism. Organization Studies, 15(2), 241-274.
20.
Marsden, R.
, & Townley, B. (1996). The owl of Minerva: Reflections on theory in practice. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 659-675). London: Sage.
21.
Parker, M.
(1992). Postmodern organizations or postmodern organization theory?Organization Studies, 13(1), 1-17.
22.
Parker, M.
, & McHugh, G. (1991). Five texts in search of an author: A response to John Hassards's `Multiple paradigms and organizational analysis."Organization Studies, 12(3), 451-456.
23.
Selznick, P.
(1949). TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
Silverman, D.
(1970). The theory of organisations: A sociological framework. London: Heinemann.
25.
Van Maanen, J.
(1979). Reclaiming qualitative methods for organizational research: A preface. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 520-526.
26.
Weick, K.
(1969). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
Willmott, H.
(1993a). Breaking the paradigm mentality. Organization Studies, 14(5), 681-719.
28.
Willmott, H.
(1993b). Paradigm gridlock: A reply. Organization Studies, 14(5), 727-730.
