Aldrich, H.
(1992). Incommensurable paradigms? Vital signs from three perspectives. In M. Reed & M. Hughes (Eds.), Rethinking organization: New directions in organization theory and analysis (pp. 17-45). London: Sage.
2.
Astley, W. G.
(1985). Administrative science as socially constructed truth. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 497-513.
3.
Burrell, G.
, & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.
4.
Donaldson, L.
(1985). In defense of organization theory: A routing of the critics. Organization Studies, 9(1), 28-32.
5.
Donaldson, L.
(1996). The normal science of structural contingency theory. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 57-76). London: Sage.
6.
Eisenhardt, K. M.
(1998). Powerful theory. Paper presented at the "What Matters Most: Powerful Theories, the Place of the Theorist, and the Place of Values in Theorizing" symposium at the Academy of Management Annual Conference, San Diego, CA.
7.
Follett, M. P.
(1918). The new state: Group organization the solution of popular government. Retrieved July 23, 1999, from http://sunsite.utk.edu/FINS/Mary_Parker_Follett/Fins-MPF-01.html
8.
Frost, P. J.
(1999). Why compassion counts!Journal of Management Inquiry, 8(2), 127-133.
9.
Gagliardi, P.
(1998). Theories empowering for action. Paper presented at the "What Matters Most: Powerful Theories, the Place of the Theorist, and the Place of Values in Theorizing" symposium at the Academy of Management Annual Conference, San Diego, CA.
10.
Graham, P.
(Ed.). (1995). Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
11.
Hassard, J.
(1988). Overcoming hermeticism in organization theory: An alternative to paradigm incommensurability. Human Relations, 41(3), 247-259.
12.
Hassard, J.
(1991). Multiple paradigms and organizational analysis: A case study. Organization Studies, 12(2), 275-299.
13.
Jackson, N.
, & Carter, P. (1993). Paradigm wars: A response to Hugh Willmott. Organization Studies, 14(5), 721-725.
14.
Koza, M. P.
, & Thoenig, J.-C. (1995). Organization theory at the crossroads: Some reflections on European and United States approaches to organizational research. Organization Science, 6(1),1-8.
15.
Litchfield, E.
(1956). Notes on a general theory of administration. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1(1), 3-29.
16.
McKinley, W.
, & Mone, M. A. (1996, August). The re-construction of organization studies: Wrestling with incommensurability. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference Presentation, Cincinnati, OH.
17.
Metcalf, H. C.
, & Urwick, L. (1940). Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett. New York: Harper and Brothers.
18.
Mone, M. A.
, & McKinley, W. (1993). The uniqueness value and its consequences for organization studies. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2, 284-296.
19.
Pfeffer, J.
(1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18, 599-620.
20.
Pfeffer, J.
(1995). Mortality, reproducibility, and the persistence of styles of theory. Organization Science, 6, 681-686.
21.
Pinder, C. C.
, & Moore, L. F. (1980). The inevitability of multiple paradigms and the resultant need for middle range analysis in organization theory. In C. C. Pinder & L. F. Moore (Eds.), Middle range theory and the study of organizations (pp. 87-100). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
22.
Reed, M.
(1985). Redirections in organizational analysis. London: Tavistock.
23.
Reed, M.
(1996). Organizational theorizing: A historically contested terrain. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 31-56). London: Sage.
24.
Roethlisberger, F. J.
, & Dixon, W. J. (1942). Management and the worker: An account of a research program conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
Selznick, P.
(1957). Leadership in administration. New York: Harper and Row.
26.
Selznick, P.
(1999). A conversation with Philip Selznick. Paper presented at the Western Academy of Management Conference, Redondo Beach, CA.
27.
Thompson, J. D.
(1956). On building an administrative science. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1(1), 102-111.
28.
Thompson, J. D.
(1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
Thorngate, W.
(1976). "In general" vs. "it depends": Some comments on the Gergen-Schlenker debate. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 404-410.
30.
Van Maanen, J.
(1995). Style as theory. Organization Science, 6(1), 132-143.
