Burrell, G.
(1996). Normal science, paradigms, metaphors, discourses and genealogies of analysis. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 642-658). London: Sage.
2.
Burrell, G.
, & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.
3.
Donaldson, L.
(1996). The normal science of structural contingency theory. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 57-76). London: Sage.
4.
Graves, W.
(1979). Scrooge: A Christmas play. Toronto, Canada: Playwrights Co-op.
5.
McKinley, W.
, & Mone, M. A. (1996, August). The re-construction of organization studies: Wrestling with incommensurability. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Cincinnati, OH.
6.
Pfeffer, J.
(1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18, 599-620.
7.
Pfeffer, J.
(1995). Mortality, reproducibility, and the persistence of styles of theory. Organization Science, 6, 681-686.
8.
Selznick, P.
(1949). TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
Thompson, J.
(1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
Van Maanen, J.
(1995). Style as theory. Organization Science, 6(1), 132-143.
