This article describes a cross-cultural exploration of the experiences of two groups of women managers and uses Q-methodology to create career scripts. This approach, based theoretically in a feminist standpoint and strong objectivity, links rich understanding of the subjective expressions of local inhabitants of a national culture and organization with concrete historical, political, and economic structures, thus bridging micro and macro levels of analysis. The project was conducted in Finland and the United States, two nations with quite different values, attitudes, policies, and programs concerning work life support and equal opportunity. Results indicate that gender is complex, multifaceted, and deeply internalized in individual behavior. It is also persistently, although differentially, embedded in societal as well as organizational structures and cultural notions of what it is to be a "good" person.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aaltio-Marjosola, I.
, & Jacobson, S. W. (1999). Researching the experience of women in "Man"agement across cultures: A feminist standpoint approach. In R. Goodman (Ed.), Modern organizations and emerging conundrums: Exploring the postindustrial subculture of the third millennium (pp. 91-109). Oxford, UK: Lexington Books.
2.
Acker, J.
(1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139-158.
3.
Acker, J.
(1994). The gender regime of Swedish banks. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 10(12), 117-130.
4.
Adler, N. J.
, & Izraeli, D. (1994). Competitive frontiers: Women managers in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
5.
Adler, N. J.
, & Jelinek, M. (1986). Is `organization culture" culture bound?Human Resource Management, 25, 73-90.
6.
Aptheker, B.
(1989). Tapestries of life: Women's work, women's consciousness, and the meaning of daily experience. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
7.
Bailyn, L.
(1999). The impact of corporate culture on work-family integration. In S. Parasuraman & J. H. Greenhaus (Eds.), Integrating work and family: Challenges and choices for a changing world (2nd ed., pp. 209-219). Westport, CT: Praeger.
8.
Bailyn, L.
, Fletcher, J. K., & Kolb, D. (1997). Unexpected connections: Considering employees' personal lives can revitalize your business. Sloan Management Review, 38(4), 11-19.
9.
Barley, S.
(1989). Careers, identities and institutions: The legacy of the Chicago School of Sociology. In M. B. Arthur, D. T. Hall, & B. S. Lawrence (Eds.), Handbook of career theory (pp. 41-66). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Berry, M.
(1995). American and Finnish myths of frontier: Implications for concepts of individualism. Unpublished manuscript, University of Turku, Finland.
11.
Berthoin Antal, A.
, & Izraeli, D. (1993). A global comparison of women in management: Women managers in their homelands and expatriates. In E. Fagenson (Ed.), Women in management: Trends, issues and challenges in managerial diversity (pp. 52-96). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Bierema, L. L.
(1996). How executive women learn culture. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7(2), 145-164.
13.
Boden, R.
(1999). Flexible working hours, family responsibilities, and female self-employment: Gender differences in self-employment selection. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(1)
14.
Bougon, M. G.
(1983). Uncovering cognitive maps: The self-Q technique. In G. Morgan G. (Ed.), Beyond method (pp. 173-188). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
Bougon, M. G.
(1986). Using the self-Q interview process. University Park: Pensylvania State University.
16.
Boyacigiller, N. A.
, & Adler, N. J. (1991). The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in a global context. Academy of Management Review, 16, 262-290.
17.
Brett, J.
(1999). Family, sex, and career advancement. In S. Parasuraman & J. H. Greenhaus, Integrating work and family: Challenges and choices for a changing world (2nd ed, pp. 143-153). Westport, CT: Praeger.
18.
Brett, J. M.
, & Stroh, L. K. (1999). Women in management: How far have we come and what needs to be done as we approach 2000?Journal of Management Inquiry, 8(4), 392-398.
19.
Brown, S. R.
(1986). Q technique and method. In W. D. Berry & M. S. Lewis-Beck (Eds.), New tools for social scientists. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Calás, M. B.
(1994, August). Love and war in the `feminine language": Communicative strategies for organizational analysis. Part of the Academy of Management Showcase Symposium, "Language: A Barrier to Organizational Understanding?" presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Dallas, Texas.
21.
Calás, M. B.
, Jacobson, S., Jacques R., & Smircich, L. (1991, August). Is a woman centered theory of management dangerous? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Miami, FL.
22.
Calás, M. B.
, & Smircich, L. (1993, March/April). Dangerous liaisons: The "feminine-in-management" meets "globalization."Business Horizons, pp. 71-81.
23.
Calás, M. B.
, & Smircich, L. (1996). From "the woman's" point of view: Feminist approaches to organization studies. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 218-257). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Calás, M. B.
, & Smircich, L. (1999). Past postmodernism? Reflections and tentative directions. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 649-671.
25.
Carr, D.
(1996). Two paths to self-employment? Women's and men's self-employment in the United States. Work and Occupations, 23, 26-53.
26.
Cox, J. A.
(1999). What's happening in the workplace?Baylor Business Review, 17(2), 7-8.
27.
Crittenden, A.
(2001). The price of motherhood: Why motherhood is the most important and least valued job in America. New York: Metropolitan.
28.
Czarniawska-Joerges, B.
(1991, April). Gender, power, organizations: An interruptive interpretation. Paper presented at the New Theory of Organizations Conference, Keele, UK.
29.
Dryden, C.
(1999). Being married, doing gender: A critical analysis of gender relationships in marriage. London: Routledge.
30.
Dyck, I.
, Lynam, J. M., & Anderson, J. M. (1995). Women talking: Creating knowledge through difference in cross-cultural research. Women's Studies International Forum, 18(5/6), 611-626.
31.
Family Medical and Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2611 et seq. (1993).
32.
Fletcher, J.
(1994). Feminist standpoint research and management science. Journal of Management Inquiry, 3(1), 74-82.
33.
Frankel, M.
(1998). Creating the family friendly workplace: Barriers and solutions. In S. Klarreich (Ed.), Handbook of organizational health psychology: Programs to make the work-place healthier (pp. 79-100). Madison, CT: Psychosocial Press.
34.
Geertz, C.
(1973). The interpretation of culture. New York: Basic Books.
35.
Glass, J.
, & Estes, S. B. (1997). The family responsive work-place. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 289-314.
36.
Golden, A.
(1997). Memoirs of a gheisha. New York: Vintage.
37.
Gordon, J. R.
, & Whelan, K. S. (1998). Successful professional women in midlife: How organizations can more effectively understand and respond to the challenges. The Academy of Management Executive, 12(1), 8-27.
38.
Gowler, D.
, & Legge, K. (1989). Rhetoric in bureaucratic careers: Managing the meaning of management success. In M. B. Arthur, D. T. Hall, & B. S. Lawrence (Eds.), Handbook of career theory (pp. 437-454). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Haraway, D.
(1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
40.
Harding, S.
(1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
41.
Harding, S.
(1987). Is there a feminist method? In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 1-15). Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
42.
Harding, S.
(1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Comell University Press.
43.
Hewlett, S.
(1986). A lesser life: The myth of women's liberation in America. New York: William Morrow.
44.
Hofstede, G.
(1984). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45.
Hofstede, G.
(1991). Cultures in organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
46.
Hofstede, G.
(1998). The cultural construction of gender. In G. Hofstede (Ed.), Masculinity & femininity: The taboo dimension of national culture (pp. 77-105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
Izraeli, D.
, & Zeira, Y. (1993). Women as managers in international business: A research review and appraisal. Business and the Contemporary World, 5(3), 35-36.
48.
Jacobson, S. W.
, & McCaul, H. S. (1996). Addressing the work-life interface: Strategic implications for small business. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 7(2), 29-43.
49.
Jacques, R.
(1993). Nursing as a basic service to society-The caring phenomenon. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 17(2), 1-10.
50.
Jakobson, M.
(1987). Finland: Myth and reality. Keuru, Finland: Otava Printing Works.
51.
Kanter, R. M.
(1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
52.
Kanter, R. M.
(1989). When giants learn to dance: Mastering the challenges of strategy, management, and careers in the 1990's. New York: Simon & Schuster.
53.
Keller, E. F.
(1984). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
54.
Kinnunen, U.
, & Mauno, S. (1998). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict among employed women and men in Finland. Human Relations, 51(2), 157-177.
55.
Kivimäki, R.
(1997). Work and parenthood. In L. Rantalaiho & T. Heiskanen (Eds.), Gendered practices in working life (pp. 89-100). New York: St. Martin's.
56.
Lewis, S.
(1999). An international perspective on work-family issues. In S. Parasuraman & J. H. Greenhaus (Eds.), Integrating work and family: Challenges and choices for a changing world (pp. 91-103). Westport, CT: Praeger.
57.
Louis, M. R.
, & Bartunek, J. M. (1992). Insider/outsider research teams: Collaboration across diverse perspectives. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1(2), 101-110.
58.
Marakowitz, E.
(1996). Gender and national identity in Finland: An exploration into women's political agency. Women's Studies International Forum, 19(1/2), 55-63.
59.
McKeown, B.
, & Thomas, D. (1988). Q methodology. In the series, Quantitative applications in the social sciences.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60.
Meyerson, D. E.
, & Fletcher, J. K. (2000, January/February). A modest manifesto for dhattering the glass ceiling. Harvard Business Review, 127-136.
61.
Millman, M.
, & Kanter, R. M. (1987). Introduction to another voice: Feminist perspectives on social life and social science. In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 29-36). Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
62.
Nicholson, L.
(1994). Interpreting gender. Signs, 20(11), 79-104.
63.
Oakley, A.
(1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30-61). Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
64.
Olesen, V.
(1994). Feminisms and models of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 158-174). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65.
Osterberg, C.
, & Hedman, B. (1988). Women and men in the Nordic countries: Facts on equal opportunities yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Copenhagen, Denmark: The Nordic Council of Ministers.
66.
Ozer, D. J.
(1993). The Q-sort method and the study of personality development. In D. C. Funder, R. D. Parke, C. Tomlinson-Keasey, & K. Widaman (Eds.), Studying lives through time: Personality and development (pp. 147-168). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
67.
Parasuraman, S.
, & Greenhaus, J. H. (1999). Integrating work and family: Challenges and choices for a changing world (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger.
68.
Rantalaiho, L.
(1997). Contextualising gender. In L. Rantalaiho & T. Heiskanen (Eds.), Gendered practices in working life (pp. 16-30). New York: St. Martin's.
69.
Rantalaiho, L.
, & Heiskanen, T. (Eds.). (1997). Gendered practices in working life. New York: St. Martin's Press.
70.
Rantalaiho, L.
, Heiskanen, T., Korvajarvi, P., & Vehvilainen, M. (1997). Studying gendered practices. In L. Rantalaiho & T. Heiskanen (Eds.), Gendered practices in working life (pp. 3-15). New York: St. Martin's.
71.
Redding, S. G.
(1994). Comparative management theory: Jungle, zoo or fossil bed?Organization Studies, 15(3), 323-359.
72.
Reich, R.
(1991). The work of nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st century capitalism. New York: Knopf.
73.
Ropo, A. (1989). Leadership and organizational change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tampere, Finland.
74.
Rosener, J.
(1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 119-125.
75.
Scharlach, A. E.
(1995). The Family Medical and Leave Act of 1993: Analysis and appraisal. Boston: Boston University Center on Work and Family.
76.
Schwandt, T. A.
(1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77.
Singer, J. B.
(1998/1999). Pairing Q methodology and case studies to explore journalists' attitudes toward new media forms. Operant Subjectivity, 22(1/2), 1-19.
78.
Sorengaard, M.
(1994). Research note: Hofstede's consequences: A study of reviews, citations and replications. Organization Studies, 15(3), 447-456.
79.
Steers, R. M.
, Bischoff, S. J., & Higgins, L. H. (1992). Cross-cultural management research: The fish and the fisherman. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1(4), 321-330.
80.
Tayeb, M.
(1994). Organizations and national culture: Methodology considered. Organization Studies, 15(3), 429-446.
81.
Tienari, J.
(1999). The first wave washed up on shore: Reform, feminization and gender resegregation. Gender, Work and Organization, 6(1), 1-19.
82.
Vincola, A.
(1998). Cultural change is the work/life solution. Workforce, 77(10), 70-74.
