Bamard, C.
(1938). The functions of executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
Bell, D. E.
, Raiffa, H., & Tversky A. (1988). Descriptive, normative and prescriptive interactions in decision making. In D. E. Bell, H. Raiffa, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Decision making (pp. 9-30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Buede, D. M.
(1986). Structuring value attributes. Interfaces, 16, 52-62.
4.
Clarkson, M.B.E.
(1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92-117.
5.
Donaldson, T.
(1999). Response: Making stakeholder theory whole. Academy of Management Review, 24, 237-241.
6.
Donaldson, T.
, & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
7.
Dyer, J. S.
, & Larsen, J. B. (1984). Using multiple objectives to approximate normative models. Annals of Operations Research, 2, 39-58.
8.
Eisenhardt, K. M.
(1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
9.
Fischer, D. W.
, & von Winterfeldt, D. (1978). Setting standards for chronic oil discharges in the North Sea. Journal of Environmental Management, 7, 177-199.
10.
Fischhoff, B.
, & Beyth, R. (1975). "I knew it would happen"-Remembered probabilities of once-future things. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 13, 1-16.
11.
Freeman, R. E.
(1984). Strategic management-A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
12.
Freeman, R. E.
(1999). Response: Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 233-236.
13.
Frooman, J.
(1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24, 191-205.
14.
Gersick, C.J.G.
(1994). Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 9-45.
15.
Gioia, D. A.
(1999). Response: Practicability, paradigms, and problems in stakeholder theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 228-231.
16.
Gregory, R.
, & Keeney, R. L. (1994). Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values. Management Science, 40, 1035-1048.
17.
Henriques, I.
, & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 87-99.
18.
Jones, T.
, & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 206-221.
19.
Keeney, R. L.
(1992). Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
Keeney, R. L.
, & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives. New York: John Wiley.
21.
Keeney, R. L.
, & von Winterfeldt, D. (1994). Managing nuclear waste from power plants. Risk Analysis, 14, 107-130.
22.
Keller, L. R.
(1989). Decision research with descriptive, normative, and prescriptive purposes-Some comments. Annals of Operations Research, 19, 485-487.
23.
Keller, L. R.
, & Ho,J. L. (1988). Decision problem structuring: Generating options. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18, 715-728.
24.
Keller, L. R.
, & Ho, J. L. (1990). Decision problem structuring. In A. P. Sage (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of information processing in systems & organizations (pp. 103-110). New York: Pergamon.
25.
Keller, L. R.
, & Kirkwood, C. W. (1999). The founding of INFORMS: A decision analysis perspective. Operations Research, 47(1), 16-28.
26.
Kirkwood, C. W.
(1997). Strategic decision making: Multiobjective decision analysis with spreadsheets. Belmont, CA: Duxbury.
27.
Leonard-Barton, D.
(1990). A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science, 1, 248-266.
28.
Lieberman, M. B.
, & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 41-58.
29.
McDaniels, T. L.
(1995). Using judgment in resource management: Amultiple objective analysis of a fisheries management decision. Operations Research, 43, 415-426.
30.
Miles, M. B.
, & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Mitchell, R. K.
, Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.
32.
Post, J. E.
, & Andrews, P. N. (1990). Case research in corporation and society studies. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), Corporation and society research: Studies in theory and measurement (pp. 203-236). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
33.
Raiffa, H.
(1982). The art and science ofnegotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Rowley, T.
(1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22, 887-910.
35.
Trevino, L. K.
, & Weaver, G. R. (1999). Response: The stake-holder research tradition: Con-verging theorists-Not converging theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 222-227.
36.
Vietor, R.H.K.
, Reinhardt, F., & Duxbury, P. (1996). StarKist (A): Harvard business case. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
37.
von Neumann, J.
, & Morgenstem, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: University Press.
38.
von Winterfeldt, D.
(1987). Value tree analysis: An introduction and an application to offshore oil drilling. In P. Kleindorfer & H. Kunreuther (Eds.), Insuring and managing hazardous risks: From Seveso to Bhopal and beyond (pp. 349-377). New York: Springer.
39.
von Winterfeldt, D.
, & Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Weber, R. P.
(1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
Weick, K.
(1969). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
42.
Winn, M. I.
(1995). Corporate leadership and policies for the natural environment: A multiple case study. In D. Collins & M. Starik (Eds.), Research in corporate social performance and policy sustaining the natural environment (pp. 127-161). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
43.
Winn, M. I.
(2001). Building stakeholder theory with a decision modeling methodology. Business & Society, 40, 133-166.
44.
Winn, M. I.
, & Keller, L. R. (1999). Harnessing complexity, idiosyncrasy and time: Amodeling methodology for corporate multi-stakeholder decisions. In D. J. Wood & D. Windsor (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society. Paris: France.
45.
Yin, R.
(1994). Case study research-Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
