Social, organizational, and managerial knowledge regarding human interactions develops incrementally in a cumulative-expansive manner. This article lists seven reasons why. A primary reason is that unlike biological organisms, social knowledge that is rejected becomes knowledge in disuse and is not extinct. It remains in the knowledge pool and may reappear at a later date and under different conditions. Social knowledge is not evolutionary, as claimed by evolutionary epistemologists. Because social knowledge is generated from unique social phenomena, it expands and accumulates by a process of selection and classification that differs considerably from biological evolution. Implications for research in organizations and management issues are listed, particularly with regard to the selection of theories in these areas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Argyris, C.
(1980). Inner contradictions of rigorous research. New York: Academic Press.
2.
Barlow, C.
(1992). From GAIA to selfish genes: Selected writings in the life sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
Baum, J.
, & McKelvey, B. (Eds.). (1999). Variations in organization science: In honor of Donald T. Campbell. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Borok, L.
(1997). Data mining: Sophisticated forms of managed care modeling through artificial intelligence. Journal of Health Care Finance, 23(3), 20-36.
5.
Brewer, J.
, Zhao, Z., Desmond, J., Glover, G., and Gabrieli, D. (1998, August 21). Making memories: Brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered. Science, pp. 1185-1187.
6.
Brodie, R.
(1995). Virus of the mind: The new science of the meme. New York: Integral Press.
7.
Campbell, D. T.
(1987). Evolutionary epistemology. In G. Radnitzky & W. Bartley (Eds.), Evolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
8.
Campbell, D. T.
(1994). How individual and face-to-face group selection undermine firm's selection in organizational evolution. In J. Baum & J. Singh (Eds.), Evolutionary dynamics of organizations (pp. 23-38). New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Campbell, D. T.
(1996). Unresolved issues in measurement validity: An autobiographical overview. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 363-368.
10.
Campbell, D. T.
, & Muir, D. (1990). Methodology and epistemology for social sciences. Sociological Inquiry, 60(3), 439-442.
11.
Cook, T.
, & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues to field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
12.
Dawkins, R.
(1977). The selfish gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
Dawkins, R.
(1996). Climbing mount improbable. New York: Viking Press.
14.
DeLisi, P.
(1998). A modern day tragedy: The digital equipment story. Journal of Management Inquiry, 7(2), 118-130.
15.
Einstein, A.
, & Infeld, L. (1938). The evolution of physics. New York: Simon & Schuster.
16.
Geisler, E.
(1999a). Harnessing the value of experience in the knowledge-driven firm. Business Horizons, 42(3), 18-26.
17.
Geisler, E.
(1999b). Methodology, theory, and knowledge in the organizational and managerial sciences: Actions and consequences. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
18.
Geisler, E.
(2000). The metrics of science and technology. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
19.
Gottfredson, L.
(1994, December 13). Mainstream science on intelligence. Wall Street Journal, p. A-18.
20.
Gould, S. J.
(1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.
21.
Heisenberg, W. K.
(1958). Physics and philosophy. New York: Harper Brothers.
22.
Helfat, C.
(1997). Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 339-360.
23.
Hernstein, R.
and Murray, C. (1995), The Bell Curve: Intellignece and Class Structure in American Life, New York: Simon & Schuster.
24.
Hull, D.
(1988). Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Kline, M.
(1985). Mathematics and the search for knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Kostoff, R.
, & Geisler, E. (1999). Strategic management and implementation of textual data mining in government organizations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 11(4), 493-525.
27.
Kuhn, T.
(1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Leach, E.
(1989). Claude Levi-Strauss. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Leonard, D.
(1998). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
30.
Levi-Strauss, C.
(1974). Structural anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
31.
Markova, I.
(1996). Towards an epistemology of social representations. Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior, 26(2), 177-196.
32.
Nahapiet, J.
, & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
33.
Nonaka, I.
, & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
Popper, K.
(1962). Conjectures and refutations. New York: Basic Books.
35.
Quammen, D.
(1996). The song of the dodo: Island biogeography in an age of extinctions. New York: Scribner.
36.
Teece, D.
, & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(4), 537-556.
37.
Velnans, M.
(1993). Common sense, functional theories, and knowledge of the mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(1), 85-86.
38.
Wagner, A.
, Schacter, D., Rotte, M., Koutstaal, W., Maril, A., Dale, A., Rosen, B., and Buckner, R. (1998, August 21). Building memories: Remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. Science, pp. 1188-1191.
39.
Weiner, J.
(1995). The beak of the finch: A story of evolution in our time. New York: Vintage Books.
40.
Wilson, E.
(1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: A. Knopf.
