Circular RNAs (circRNAs) affect fundamental biological processes, but their genetic effects on nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) remain unclear.
Methods
RNA sequencing of human embryonic palate mesenchyme cells identified circRNAs and their microRNA response elements (MREs) involved in NSCL/P. Genetic effects of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in MREs were evaluated in 858 NSCL/P cases and 1248 controls. Weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) and the predictive performance were evaluated through areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
Results
We identified 6272 MREs of 574 known and 53 novel circRNAs harboring 130 SNPs. Rs629772 in circPRKCE and rs365132 in circUIMC1 showed significant associations with NSCL/P [rs629772: OR = 0.82, P = 6.45E-03; rs365132: OR = 0.78, P = 7.85E-04]. Adding these SNPs to wGRS improved AUC to 0.707 for NSCL/P prediction. Additionally, rs629772 T>C increased the binding affinity of hsa-miR-628-5p and circPRKCE, and rs365132 G>T increased the binding of hsa-miR-374c-3p and hsa-miR-3916 to circUIMC1, followed by the alteration of 9, 6, and 65 target genes for hsa-miR-628-5p, hsa-miR-374c-3p, and hsa-miR-3916, respectively, which participated in key biological pathways.
Conclusion
This study indicated genetic effects in circRNA MREs associated with NSCL/P, offering insights into the genetic regulation and functional mechanisms of the disease.
HeikeCLEvansKN. Evaluation of adults born with an oral cleft: aren't adults just big kids?JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(11):1045–1046. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.2639
2.
MangoldELudwigKUBirnbaumSBaluardoCFerrianMHermsSReutterHde AssisNAChawaTAMattheisenM, et al.Genome-wide association study identifies two susceptibility loci for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Nat Genet. 2010;42(1):24–26. doi:10.1038/ng.506
3.
SunYHuangYYinAPanYWangYWangCDuYWangMLanFHuZ, et al.Genome-wide association study identifies a new susceptibility locus for cleft lip with or without a cleft palate. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6414. doi:10.1038/ncomms7414
4.
LeslieEJCarlsonJCShafferJRFeingoldEWehbyGLaurieCAJainDLaurieCCDohenyKFMcHenryT, et al.A multi-ethnic genome-wide association study identifies novel loci for non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate on 2p24.2, 17q23 and 19q13. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(13):2862–2872. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddw104
5.
LiuHLeslieEJCarlsonJCBeatyTHMarazitaMLLidralACCornellRA. Identification of common non-coding variants at 1p22 that are functional for non-syndromic orofacial clefting. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14759. doi:10.1038/ncomms14759
6.
MauranoMTHumbertRRynesEThurmanREHaugenEWangHReynoldsAPSandstromRQuHBrodyJ, et al.Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science. 2012;337(6099):1190–1195. doi:10.1126/science.1222794
7.
Ashwal-FlussRMeyerMPamudurtiNRIvanovABartokOHananMEvantalNMemczakSRajewskyNKadenerS, et al.circRNA biogenesis competes with pre-mRNA splicing. Mol Cell. 2014;56(1):55–66. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.019
8.
CocquerelleCMascrezBHetuinDBailleulB. Mis-splicing yields circular RNA molecules. FASEB J. 1993;7(1):155–160. doi:10.1096/fasebj.7.1.7678559
9.
MemczakSJensMElefsiniotiATortiFKruegerJRybakAMaierLMackowiakSDGregersenLHMunschauerM, et al.Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature. 2013;495(7441):333–338. doi:10.1038/nature11928
10.
GaoYWangJZhengYZhangJChenSZhaoF. Comprehensive identification of internal structure and alternative splicing events in circular RNAs. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12060. doi:10.1038/ncomms12060
11.
HansenTBJensenTIClausenBHBramsenJBFinsenBDamgaardCKKjemsJ. Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature. 2013;495(7441):384–388. doi:10.1038/nature11993
12.
ZhengQBaoCGuoWLiSChenJChenBLuoYLyuDLiYShiG, et al.Circular RNA profiling reveals an abundant circHIPK3 that regulates cell growth by sponging multiple miRNAs. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11215. doi:10.1038/ncomms11215
13.
LiYZhengFXiaoXXieFTaoDHuangCLiuDWangMWangLZengF, et al.CircHIPK3 sponges miR-558 to suppress heparanase expression in bladder cancer cells. EMBO Rep. 2017;18(9):1646–1659. doi:10.15252/embr.201643581
14.
WenCFengXYuanHGongYWangG. Circ_0003266 sponges miR-503-5p to suppress colorectal cancer progression via regulating PDCD4 expression. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):284. doi:10.1186/s12885-021-07997-0
KristensenLSAndersenMSStagstedLVWEbbesenKKHansenTBKjemsJ. The biogenesis, biology and characterization of circular RNAs. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20(11):675–691. doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0158-7
17.
LiuZYuYHuangZKongYHuXXiaoWQuanJFanX. CircRNA-5692 inhibits the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma by sponging miR-328-5p to enhance DAB2IP expression. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(12):900. doi:10.1038/s41419-019-2089-9
18.
PiweckaMGlazarPHernandez-MirandaLRMemczakSWolfSARybak-WolfAFilipchykAKlironomosFCerda JaraCAFenskeP, et al.Loss of a mammalian circular RNA locus causes miRNA deregulation and affects brain function. Science. 2017;357(6357). doi:10.1126/science.aam8526
19.
ChengZZhangYZhaoRZhouYDongYQiuAXuHLiuYZhangWChangQ, et al.A novel circRNA-SNP may increase susceptibility to silicosis. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022;242:113855. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113855
20.
ZhangKLiSGuDXuKZhengRXinJMengYBenSChuHZhangZ, et al.Genetic variants in circTUBB interacting with smoking can enhance colorectal cancer risk. Arch Toxicol. 2020;94(1):325–333. doi:10.1007/s00204-019-02624-1
21.
ChengWLiXWXiaoYQDuanSB. Non-coding RNA-associated ceRNA networks in a new contrast-induced acute kidney injury rat model. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2019;17:102–112. doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2019.05.011
22.
GaoYZhangJZhaoF. Circular RNA identification based on multiple seed matching. Brief Bioinform. 2018;19(5):803–810. doi:10.1093/bib/bbx014
23.
KrzywinskiMScheinJBirolIConnorsJGascoyneRHorsmanDJonesSJMarraMA. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19(9):1639–1645. doi:10.1101/gr.092759.109
24.
PembertonTJSzpiechZA. Relationship between deleterious variation, genomic autozygosity, and disease risk: insights from the 1000 genomes project. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;102(4):658–675. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.02.013
25.
PasaniucBZaitlenNShiHBhatiaGGusevAPickrellJHirschhornJStrachanDPPattersonNPriceAL. Fast and accurate imputation of summary statistics enhances evidence of functional enrichment. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(20):2906–2914. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu416
26.
KobayashiGSAlviziLSunagaDYFrancis-WestPKutaAAlmadaBVPFerreiraSGde Andrade-LimaLCBuenoDFRaposo-AmaralCE, et al.Susceptibility to DNA damage as a molecular mechanism for non-syndromic cleft lip and palate. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e65677. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065677
27.
RajderkarSSParaisoKAmaralMLKosickiMCookLEDarbellayFSpurrellCHOsterwalderMZhuYWuH, et al.Dynamic enhancer landscapes in human craniofacial development. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):2030. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46396-4
28.
BuDLuoHHuoPWangZZhangSHeZWuYZhaoLLiuJGuoJ, et al.KOBAS-i: intelligent prioritization and exploratory visualization of biological functions for gene enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W317–W325. doi:10.1093/nar/gkab447
29.
XuHWangCSongHXuYJiG. RNA-Seq profiling of circular RNAs in human colorectal cancer liver metastasis and the potential biomarkers. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):8. doi:10.1186/s12943-018-0932-8
30.
GongSGaccioliFDopieralaJSovioUCookEVoldersP-JMartensLKirkPDWRichardsonSSmithGCS, et al.The RNA landscape of the human placenta in health and disease. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2639. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22695-y
31.
MisirSWuNYangBB. Specific expression and functions of circular RNAs. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29(3):481–491. doi:10.1038/s41418-022-00948-7
32.
QiuMXiaWChenRWangSXuYMaZXuWZhangEWangJFangT, et al.The circular RNA circPRKCI promotes tumor growth in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2018;78(11):2839–2851. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-2808
33.
WuYWeiYLiYDouYYangYLiuHWangXWangZSuJZhangY, et al.Sperm-derived CircRNA-1572 regulates embryogenesis and zygotic genome activation by targeting CCNB2 via bta-miR-2478-L-2. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025;12(18):e2414325. doi:10.1002/advs.202414325
34.
LiXYangLChenLL. The biogenesis, functions, and challenges of circular RNAs. Mol Cell. 2018;71(3):428–442. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.034
35.
ShuXChengLDongZShuS. Identification of circular RNA-associated competing endogenous RNA network in the development of cleft palate. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(9):16062–16074. doi:10.1002/jcb.28888
36.
MulderPPPetersJJDawoodYJacobsKVisserSCHagoortJder VeerJHHemkeRPajkrtEOostraR, et al.Timing of secondary palate fusion in human embryos and fetuses. Birth Defects Res. 2026;118(2):e70029. doi:10.1002/bdr2.70029
37.
CrouchDJMBodmerWF. Polygenic inheritance, GWAS, polygenic risk scores, and the search for functional variants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(32):18924–18933. doi:10.1073/pnas.2005634117
38.
TangXRenHGuoMQianJYangYGuC. Review on circular RNAs and new insights into their roles in cancer. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:910–928. doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.01.018
39.
NicolosoMSSunHSpizzoRKimHWickramasinghePShimizuMWojcikSEFerdinJKunejTXiaoL, et al.Single-nucleotide polymorphisms inside microRNA target sites influence tumor susceptibility. Cancer Res. 2010;70(7):2789–2798. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3541
40.
YamaguchiHKitamiKWuXHeLWangJWangBKomatsuY. Alteration of DNA damage response causes cleft palate. Front Physiol. 2021;12:649492. doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.649492
41.
BartuselMKimSXRehimiRDarnellAMNikolićMHeggemannJKolovosPvan IjckenWFJVarineauJCrispatzuG, et al.A non-syndromic orofacial cleft risk locus links tRNA splicing defects to neural crest cell pathologies. Am J Hum Genet. 2025;112(5):1097–1116. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.03.017
42.
DuckerGSRabinowitzJD. One-carbon metabolism in health and disease. Cell Metab. 2017;25(1):27–42. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.009
43.
WangSShiJLiuCWangPWangMLiWZhouRZhengHJiangJLiN, et al.Evidence of the folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism pathway genes in controlling the non-syndromic oral clefts risks. Oral Dis. 2021;29:1080–1088. doi:10.1111/odi.14068
44.
WangXZhaoXZhengXPengXChenJWangYWangZMengMDuJ. Sirt6 loss activates Got1 and facilitates cleft palate through abnormal activating glycolysis. Cell Death Dis. 2025;16(1):159. doi:10.1038/s41419-025-07465-8
45.
ZhaoXZhengXWangYChenJWangXPengXYuanDLiuYWangZDuJ. Administration of Porphyromonas gingivalis in pregnant mice enhances glycolysis and histone lactylation/ADAM17 leading to cleft palate in offspring. Int J Oral Sci. 2025;17(1):18. doi:10.1038/s41368-025-00347-x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
