Abstract
Objective
To compare the incidence of ocular abnormalities in patients with metopic craniosynostosis (MCS) treated with cranial vault reconstruction (CVR) versus endoscopic suturectomy (ESC).
Design
Retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Research Network.
Setting
Multi-institutional electronic health record database.
Patients, Participants
A total of 588 pediatric patients with non-syndromic MCS (441 CVR, 147 ESC) were identified by ICD-10 and CPT codes. Propensity score matching and age adjustment were performed to reduce confounding.
Interventions
Subjects underwent either CVR or ESC. Ocular and surgical complication outcomes were assessed.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Primary outcome is ocular abnormalities. Secondary outcomes include surgical complications and reoperations.
Results
Ocular abnormalities were present in 40.31% of MCS patients. CVR was associated with a significantly higher incidence compared to ESC (44.67% vs 27.21%; RR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.23-2.18). CVR patients had greater rates of strabismus (15.19% vs 7.48%; RR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.10-3.74), ametropia (29.71% vs 11.56%; RR = 2.57; 95% CI: 1.58-4.20), and astigmatism (15.87% vs 2.72%; RR = 5.84; 95% CI: 2.17-15.70). These differences remained significant after adjusting for age and matching by sex, race, and ethnicity. The ESC group showed ocular outcomes comparable to the general pediatric population.
Conclusions
Patients with metopic craniosynostosis have a high rate of ocular abnormalities, and there may be a difference between those who undergo CVR versus ESC. These findings underscore the need for routine ophthalmologic surveillance and future prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
