Abstract
Objective
To compare aesthetic outcomes in patients with bilateral cleft lip treated with concurrent primary rhinoplasty (PR) versus non-primary rhinoplasty (NPR), using layperson and anthropometric assessments.
Design
Retrospective review of patients undergoing bilateral cleft lip repair between 2008 and 2024.
Setting
Single tertiary care institution.
Patients/Participants
Seventy-five children (mean age = 6.1 ± 3.6 months) who underwent bilateral cleft lip repair.
Interventions
PR performed in 55 patients (73.3%) and non-PR in 20 patients (26.7%). Preoperative cleft severity was graded with the Bilateral Cleft Lip Severity Index (BCLSI; grades 1-3). Presurgical nasoalveolar molding (NAM) and nasal stenting were also evaluated.
Main Outcome Measures
Layperson perception surveys (pairwise comparison and Likert scale) and anthropometric analyses of nasal appearance.
Results
Lower BCLSI scores predicted superior aesthetic ratings. Lip adhesion after NAM failure correlated with inferior ratings (p < .001). Overall, PR did not yield superior nasal appearance compared with NPR. In subgroup analysis, PR patients in the BCLSI3 group had higher layperson scores (p = .036). PR with nasal stenting ≥21 days was associated with greater Goode's ratio (p < .001). Increased columellar-labial angle correlated with inferior nasal appearance (p = .029).
Conclusions
These data highlight the impact of presurgical NAM on oronasal outcomes and preoperative cleft severity to guide personalized surgical approaches in this patient population.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
