Abstract
Objective
To compare the 2-year post-treatment stability of vertical and transverse dimensions in orthodontic patients with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate (CLP) versus non-cleft controls (NC).
Design
Retrospective comparative study.
Patients/Participants
Twenty-eight patients divided into CLP (n = 14) and NC (n = 14) groups matched for age and sex.
Interventions
Orthodontic fixed appliance therapy followed by removable vacuum-formed retainers.
Main Outcome Measures
Vertical changes were assessed with lateral cephalograms, and transverse relationships were analyzed using the Modified Huddart-Bodenham (MHB) Index. Intragroup changes (T0-T1) were analyzed with paired t-tests and intergroup differences with unpaired t-tests (P < .05).
Results
At 2-year post-treatment, the cleft group showed significant reductions in anterior facial height (−1.06 ± 0.59 mm, P < .001), U1-NF (−0.31 ± 0.48 mm, P = .01), L1-MP (−0.54 ± 0.63 mm, P = .004), and U6-NF (−0.66 ± 0.70 mm, P < .001). Transverse relapse was evident at the incisors (−0.36 ± 0.50, P = .006), molars (−0.43 ± 0.51, P = .002), and in total scores (−0.29 ± 0.47, P = .007). The NC group showed minimal changes (P > .05).
Conclusions
Patients with CLP demonstrate greater vertical and transverse orthodontic relapse 2-year post-treatment compared to non-cleft patients. These findings underscore the necessity for potential permanent retention protocols tailored to the unique anatomical and physiological challenges of the cleft population.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
