To describe characteristic CLEFT-Q response profiles and patterns in patients with cleft palate and/or lip (CP ± L).
Design
Retrospective analysis using latent profile analysis (LPA) to categorize patient-reported outcome responses into distinct profiles.
Setting
Tertiary care pediatric hospital with multidisciplinary cleft team.
Patients, Participants
Patients aged 8–29 years with CP ± L completing CLEFT-Q questionnaires from September 2021 to June 2025 (n = 596). Total of 923 responses analyzed after excluding 94 responses from patients under 8 years.
Interventions
Administration of the 119-item CLEFT-Q questionnaire prior to clinic visits, measuring appearance, function, and quality of life.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Six latent profiles identified through LPA based on CLEFT-Q scores. Secondary outcomes included profile stability and surgical effects.
Results
Six profiles of CLEFT-Q responses emerged among subjects: Universally Affected-Moderate (UA1, n = 228, 24.7%), Universally Affected-Severe (UA2, n = 119, 12.9%), Facial Appearance-Moderate (FA1, n = 183, 19.8%), Facial Appearance-Severe (FA2, n = 56, 6.1%), Social/School/Speech distress (SSS, n = 95, 10.3%), and Minimally Distressed (MD, n = 242, 26.2%). Patients in severe profiles (UA2 and FA2) were older (P < .001) and more likely to have complete cleft lip (P < .001), while patients in the MD profile were younger and more likely to have isolated cleft palate (P < .001). Among 279 patients with longitudinal CLEFT-Q data, 47.5% remained in the same profile at subsequent CLEFT-Q response, with longer follow-up intervals predicting profile change (P = .049).
Conclusions
Latent profile analysis categorizes CLEFT-Q responses into six clinically meaningful profiles correlating with demographics and treatment outcomes. This approach may guide personalized cleft care, though additional studies are needed for validation.
PutriFAPattamattaMAnitaSESMaulinaT. The Global Occurrences of Cleft Lip and Palate in Pediatric Patients and Their Association with Demographic Factors: A Narrative Review. Children (Basel). Mar 8 2024;11(3). doi:10.3390/children11030322
2.
MassenburgBBHopperRACroweCS, MorrisonSD, AlonzoN, CalisM, DonkorP, KreshantiP, YuanJ, Global Burden of Disease2017 Orofacial Clefting Collaborators. Global burden of orofacial clefts and the world surgical workforce. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1 2021;148(4):568e–580e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000008334
3.
BastaMNSilvestreJStranskyC, SolotC, CohenM, McDonal-McGinnD, ZackaiE, KirschnerR, LowDW, RandallP, et al.A 35-year experience with syndromic cleft palate repair: Operative outcomes and long-term speech function. Ann Plast Surg. Dec 2014;73(Suppl 2):S130–S135. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000000286
4.
TseRWSieKCTollefsonTT, JacksonOA, KirschnerR, FisherDM, BlyR, ArnejaJS, DahlJP, SoldanskaM, et al.Surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency following cleft palate repair: An audit of contemporary practice and proposed schema of techniques and variations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Oct 2024;61(10):1721–1734. doi:10.1177/10556656231181359
5.
SalineroLKRomeoDJPontellME, FriedmanL, AhluwaliaVS, WagnerCS, BarreroCE, NapoliJ, JacksonOA, LowDW, et al.Psychosocial Status and self-perception in patients with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Mar 4 2024:10556656241236369. doi:10.1177/10556656241236369
6.
SalineroLKAhluwaliaVSBarreroCE, WagnerCS, PontellME, MageeL, LowDW, JacksonOA, NapoliJA, BartlettSP, et al.Long-Term patient-reported outcomes in internationally adopted children with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Jan 2025;62(1):44–50. doi:10.1177/10556656231198647
7.
RomeoDJLenzTAkarapimandP, NgJJ, WuM, NapoliJA, SwansonJW, JacksonOA, TaylorJA, MageeL. Patient reported outcomes in patients with cleft lip and/or palate help identify youth at risk for suicidality. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Sep 9 2024:10556656241277694. doi:10.1177/10556656241277694
8.
SalineroLKVillavisanisDFCheungL, FerroDF, FolsomN, ChoDY, LowDW, JacksonO, BartlettSP, SwansonJW, et al.Integration of the CLEFT-Q patient-reported outcome tool into a multidisciplinary cleft and craniofacial clinic: A proof of concept. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1 2024;154(2):351e–355e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000010859
9.
FrederickRHoganACSeaboltNStocksRMS. An ideal multidisciplinary cleft lip and cleft palate care team. Oral Dis. Jul 2022;28(5):1412-1417. doi:10.1111/odi.14213
10.
SalimiNAleksejunieneJYenEHLooAY. Fistula in cleft lip and palate patients-A systematic scoping review. Ann Plast Surg. Jan 2017;78(1):91-102. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000000819
11.
HardwickeJTLandiniGRichardBM. Fistula incidence after primary cleft palate repair: A systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 2014;134(4):618e-627e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000548
12.
VandenbergKCastleMQeadanFKraaiT. Oronasal Fistula incidence associated with vomer flap repair of cleft palate: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Aug 2021;58(8):957-965. doi:10.1177/1055665620974562
13.
AhmedMKMaganziniALMarantzPRRoussoJJ. Risk of persistent palatal fistula in patients with cleft palate. JAMA Facial Plast Surg.Mar–Apr 2015;17(2):126-130. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2014.1436
14.
SellD. Issues in perceptual speech analysis in cleft palate and related disorders: A review. Int J Lang Commun Disord. Apr–Jun 2005;40(2):103-121. doi:10.1080/13682820400016522
15.
MorrisonMMMasonNTFordeBLStonePRFowlerPVThompsonJMD. Speech outcomes of a national cohort of children with orofacial cleft at 5 and 10 years of age. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Nov 2022;59(11):1400-1412. doi:10.1177/10556656211044939
16.
StantonEWRochlinDLorenzHPSheckterCC. Early Cleft Palate Repair is Associated With Lower Incidence of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Surgery. J Craniofac Surg. Aug 26 2024. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000010540
17.
ChangFCSHuangJJWallaceCG, HsiaoYC, ChenZC, LiaoYF, ChenPKT. Comparison of facial growth between two nasoalveolar molding techniques in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1 2023;152(5):1078–1083. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000010448
18.
NgJJBanalaMSussmanJH, MassenburgBB, WuM, RomeoDJ, JacksonOA, LowDW, TaylorJA, SwansonJW. Primary rhinoplasty for unilateral cleft lip: A long-term cohort assessment of aesthetic and anthropometric outcomes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Jan 9 2025:10556656241309810. doi:10.1177/10556656241309810
CelieKBWrightMAAschermanJA. Primary cleft rhinoplasty: Long-term outcomes of a single technique used over 2 decades. Ann Plast Surg. Jul 1 2021;87(1s Suppl 1):S7-S12. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000002804
22.
Wong RiffKWTsangarisEGoodacreT, ForrestCR, PusicAL, CanoSJ, KlassenAF. International multiphase mixed methods study protocol to develop a cross-cultural patient-reported outcome instrument for children and young adults with cleft lip and/or palate (CLEFT-Q). BMJ Open. Jan 11 2017;7(1):e015467. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015467
23.
TsangarisEWong RiffKWYGoodacreT, ForrestCR, DreiseM, SykesJ, de ChalainT, HarmanK, O'MahonyA, PusicAL, et al.Establishing content validity of the CLEFT-Q: A new patient-reported outcome instrument for cleft lip/palate. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. Apr 2017;5(4):e1305. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000001305
24.
KlassenAFRiffKWWLongmireNM, AlbertA, AllenGC, AydinMA, BakerSB, CanoSJ, ChanAJ, CourtemancheDJ, et al.Psychometric findings and normative values for the CLEFT-Q based on 2434 children and young adult patients with cleft lip and/or palate from 12 countries. CMAJ. Apr 16 2018;190(15):E455–E462. doi:10.1503/cmaj.170289
25.
Wong RiffKWYTsangarisEGoodacreTEE, ForrestCR, LawsonJ, PusicAL, KlassenAF. What matters to patients with cleft lip and/or palate: An international qualitative study informing the development of the CLEFT-Q. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Mar 2018;55(3):442–450. doi:10.1177/1055665617732854
26.
SalineroLKCheungLVillavisanisDF, WagnerCS, BarreroCE, PontellME, JacksonOA, TaylorJA, LowDW, SwansonJW. How does CLEFT-Q change the way we practice? A prospective study integrating patient-reported outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1 2024;154(5):1037–1045. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000011036
27.
FergusonSarah L, HullDarrell M.. Personality profiles: Using latent profile analysis to model personality typologies. Pers Individ Dif. 2018;122:177–183. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.029
28.
VuongQuang H. Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica. 1989;57(2):307. doi:10.2307/1912557
29.
LoY, MendellNR, RubinDB. Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika. 2001;88(3):767–778. doi:10.1093/biomet/88.3.767
30.
SpurkD, HirschiA, WangM, ValeroD, KauffeldS. Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. J Vocat Behav. 2020;120:103445. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
31.
SinhaP, CalfeeCS, DelucchiKL. Practitioner’s Guide to Latent Class Analysis: Methodological Considerations and Common Pitfalls. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(1):e63–e79. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004710
32.
CostaPT, HerbstJH, McCraeRR, SamuelsJ, OzerDJ. The replicability and utility of three personality types. Eur J Pers. 2002;16(1_suppl):S73–S87. doi:10.1002/per.448.
33.
KlingenbergI, SüßS. Profiling resilience: A latent profile analysis of German nurses' coping and resilience. Front Health Serv. 2022;2:274. doi:10.3389/frhs.2022.960100
34.
Vaillancourt‐MorelMP, LabadieC, Charbonneau‐LefebvreV, SabourinS, GodboutN. A latent profile analysis of romantic attachment anxiety and avoidance. J Marital Fam Ther. 2022;48(2):391–410. doi:10.1111/jmft.v48.2
35.
ChoiEY, PyoJ, OckM, LeeH. Profiles of second victim symptoms and desired support strategies among Korean nurses: A latent profile analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2022;78(9):2872–2883. doi:10.1111/jan.v78.9
36.
FordT, LipsonJ, MillerL. Spiritually grounded character: A latent profile analysis. Front Psychol. 2023;13:371. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1061416
37.
YuZ, YeB, HuY, YangQ. Latent profile analysis of positive solitude during the recurrent outbreak of COVID-19. Front Public Health. 2022;10:912. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.872128
38.
LanzaST, RhoadesBL. Latent class analysis: An alternative perspective on subgroup analysis in prevention and treatment. Prev Sci. 2013;14(2):157–168. doi:10.1007/s11121-011-0201-1
39.
A User’s Guide for Researchers and Clinicians. McMaster University; 2017. https://qportfolio.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/CLEFT-Q-USERS-GUIDE.pdf
40.
BăjenaruL, BalogA, DobreC, DrăghiciR, PradaGI. Latent profile analysis for quality of life in older patients. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):179. doi:10.1186/s12877-022-03518-1
41.
YonkmanAM, AlampiJD, KaidaA, AllenRW, ChenA, LanphearBP, BraunJM, MuckleG, ArbuckleTE, McCandlessLC. Using latent profile analysis to identify associations between gestational chemical mixtures and child neurodevelopment. Epidemiology. 2023;34(1):45–55. doi:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001554
42.
BruscoMJ, ShiremanE, SteinleyD. A comparison of latent class, K-means, and K-median methods for clustering dichotomous data. Psychol Methods. 2017;22(3):563–580. doi:10.1037/met0000095
43.
R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2010. http://www.R-project.org.
44.
RosenbergJ, BeymerP, AndersonD, van LissaC, SchmidtJ. tidyLPA: An R Package to Easily Carry Out Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) Using Open-Source or Commercial Software. Journal of Open Source Software. 2018;3(30):978. doi:10.21105/joss
45.
SchwarzG. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat. 1978;6(2):461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
46.
CeleuxG, SoromenhoG. An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. J Classif. 1996;13(2):195–212. doi:10.1007/BF01246098
47.
TofighiD, EndersCK. Identifying the correct number of classes in growth mixture models. Advances in latent variable mixture models. 2008.
48.
MorganGB. Mixed mode latent class analysis: An examination of fit index performance for classification. Struct Equ Modeling. 2014;22(1):76–86. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.935751
49.
NylundKL, AsparouhovT, MuthénBO. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct Equ Modeling. 2007;14(4):535–569. doi:10.1080/10705510701575396
50.
CollinsLM, LanzaST. Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. John Wiley and Sons; 2009.
51.
ClarkS. Relating latent class analysis results to variables not included in the analysis. University of California. 2009.
52.
VolpicelliEJ, PfaffMJ, HakimiK, BradleyJP, SolemRC, LeeJC. Age-related differences in psychosocial function of children with craniofacial anomalies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(4):776–784. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003687.
53.
JoshanlooM. Stability of symptoms of psychological distress: A 13‐year study using Australian national data. Stress Health. 2023;39(1):219–225. doi:10.1002/smi.v39.1
54.
MiroshnychenkoA, RaeC, Wong RiffK, ForrestCR, GoodacreT, SwanMC, SlatorR, GoldsteinJ, ThomaA, HarmanK, KlassenA. A prospective study to examine responsiveness and minimally important differences (MIDs) for the CLEFT-Q scales following three cleft-specific operations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023;60(4):413–420. doi:10.1177/10556656211064479
55.
KosykMS, ZapateroZD, KalmarCL, CarlsonAR, SwansonJW, BartlettSP, TaylorJA. Nasal obstruction evaluation after LeFort I osteotomy: A pilot study. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(1):101–103. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000008048
56.
StrianeseO, RizzoF, CiccarelliM, GalassoG, D’AgostinoY, SalvatiA, Del GiudiceC, TesorioP, RuscianoMR. Precision and personalized medicine: How genomic approach improves the management of cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disease. Genes. 2020;11(7):747. doi:10.3390/genes11070747
57.
DouglasMP, KumarA. Analyzing precision medicine utilization with real-world data: A scoping review. J Pers Med. 2022;12(4):557. doi:10.3390/jpm12040557
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
