Abstract
Objective
Despite evidence of effective management of upper airway obstruction (UAO) in infants with Robin sequence (RS), adoption of the pre-epiglottic baton plate (PEBP) has been slow in North America. The objectives of this study were to identify barriers and elucidate opportunities to overcome them.
Design
An email list of providers in craniofacial units involved in management of RS was compiled using published data form the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association and institutional websites. A custom-designed survey was distributed to the compiled listserv. Responses were aggregated and descriptive statistics were calculated.
Participants
Of 2142 distributed, 139 responses were received (yield 6.5%). Seventeen were excluded, resulting in 122 responses from 80 (65.6%) surgeons and 42 (34.4%) nonsurgeons.
Results
Only 11 (9.0%) respondents reported that they currently offer PEBP treatment, and only 33 (27.5%) feel there is sufficient clinical evidence to support the use of PEBP. The most commonly reported barriers to implementation were doubts about clinical effectiveness (n = 67, 54.9%), availability of staff to fabricate the appliance (n = 41, 33.6%), concerns about family acceptance (n = 34, 27.9%), the potential for the appliance to cause harm (n = 26, 21.3%), and lack of clarity in billing and insurance coverage (n = 19, 15.6%).
Conclusions
The primary barriers to adoption of the PEBP in North America are a perceived insufficiency of evidence of its effectiveness and lack of appropriate staff to fabricate the appliances. Identification of these concerns provides opportunities to augment the body of literature and to identify and educate providers on fabrication techniques.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
