To present a comprehensive guide for integrating digital scanning into the presurgical infant orthopedics (PSIO) workflow, enhancing precision and efficiency in cleft lip and palate (CLP) treatment.
Design
Descriptive study
Methods
The guide emphasizes the use of high-precision intraoral scanners and essential armamentarium for effective scanning. Key aspects include infant and operator positioning, secure infant stabilization, and ergonomic considerations for clinicians. Different scanning trajectories are recommended to ensure complete anatomical capture.
Results
High-resolution digital models generated through meticulous preparation and iterative scanning techniques mitigate potential pitfalls, such as motion artifacts and incomplete scans. These models enable the development of a digital workflow for creating patient-specific appliances.
Conclusion
Integrating digital scanning into the PSIO workflow improves the accuracy, efficiency, and effectiveness of CLP treatment in clinical settings.
BatraPDatanaSAroraA. Presurgical infant orthopedics: A developmental and clinical evolution. J Cleft Lip Palate Craniofac Anom. 2022;9(1):101–109.
2.
SennimalaiKSelvarajMSiddiquiHPMongaNSameemullahKH. Exploring the potential applications of intraoral scanners in the treatment of cleft lip and palate deformity-A scoping review of literature. J World Fed Orthod. 2024;13(6):265–278. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.06.001
3.
ChalmersEVMcIntyreGTWangWGillgrassTMartinCBMosseyPA. Intraoral 3D scanning or dental impressions for the assessment of dental arch relationships in cleft care: Which is superior?Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(5):568–577.
4.
ManganoFGandolfiALuongoGLogozzoS. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: A review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):149.
5.
SantosJWMMuellerAABenitezBKLillYNalabothuPMunizFWMG. Smartphone-based scans of palate models of newborns with cleft lip and palate: Outlooks for three-dimensional image capturing and machine learning plate tool. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2025;28(1):166–174. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12859.
6.
KreyKFRatzmannAMetelmannPHHartmannMRugeSKordaßB. Fully digital workflow for presurgical orthodontic plate in cleft lip and palate patients. Int J Comput Dent. 2018;21(3):251–259.
7.
PatelJWintersJWaltersM. Intraoral digital impression technique for a neonate with bilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019;56(8):1120–1123.
8.
DalessandriTonniLaffranchiMiglioratiIsolaBonettiViscontiPaganelli . Evaluation of a digital protocol for Pre-surgical orthopedic treatment of cleft lip and palate in newborn patients: A pilot study. Dent J (Basel).2019 Dec 9;7(4):111.
9.
ShanbhagGPandeySMehtaNKiniYKiniA. A virtual noninvasive way of constructing a nasoalveolar molding plate for cleft babies, using intraoral scanners, CAD, and prosthetic milling. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(2):263–266.
10.
BatraPGribelBFAbhinavBAAroraARaghavanS. Orthoaligner “NAM": A case series of presurgical infant orthopedics (PSIO) using clear aligners. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(5):646–655.
11.
WeiseCFrankKWiechersCWeiseHReinertSKoosBXepapadeasAB. Intraoral scanning of neonates and infants with craniofacial disorders: Feasibility, scanning duration, and clinical experience. Eur J Orthod. 2022;44(3):279–286.
12.
ElNaghyRAminSAHasaninM. Evaluating the accuracy of intraoral direct digital impressions in 2 infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate compared with digitized conventional impression. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;162(3):403–409.
13.
BenitezBKBrudnickiASurowiecZWieprzowskiŁRasaduraiANalabothuPLillYMuellerAA. Digital impressions from newborns to preschoolers with cleft lip and palate: A two-centers experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(11):4233–4242.
14.
ZareanPZareanPThieringerFMMuellerAAKressmannSErismannMSharmaNBenitezBK. A point-of-care digital workflow for 3D printed passive presurgical orthopedic plates in cleft care. Children (Basel). 2022;9(8):1261.
15.
OkazakiTKawanabeHFukuiK. Comparison of conventional impression making and intraoral scanning for the study of unilateral cleft lip and palate. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2023;63(1):16–22.
UnnikrishnanJEtemad ShahidiYBakrMLoveRIdrisG. Clinician- and patient-centred outcomes of digital impressions in infants with cleft lip and palate: A systematic review. Children (Basel). 2024;11(3):343.
18.
FerrariRÖzcanMWiedemeierDEssigH. Accuracy of intraoral scanners in neonates cleft anatomy. Int J Comput Dent. 2025 Jan 28;0(0):0. doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b5886430
19.
GongXDangRXuTYuQZhengJ. Full digital workflow of nasoalveolar molding treatment in infants with cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2020(2):367–371.
20.
WeismannCXepapadeasABBockstedteMKoosBKrimmelMPoetsCFAretxabaletaM. Complete digital workflow for manufacturing presurgical orthodontic palatal plates in newborns and infants with cleft lip and/or palate. J. Funct. Biomater. 2024;15(10):301.
21.
CarterCBGallardoFFJrColburnHESchliederDW. Novel digital workflow for nasoalveolar molding and postoperative nasal stent for infants with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023;60(9):1176–1181.
