To examine the impact of prior upper airway obstruction (UAO) management on postoperative complications following palatoplasty in patients with Robin Sequence (RS) and compare the costs of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) versus surgical floor care.
Design
Prospective cohort study.
Setting
Tertiary pediatric hospital.
Patients/Participants
Fifty-eight patients with RS undergoing palatoplasty from 2006 to 2020.
Interventions
Patients were grouped by prior UAO management: conservative, tongue-lip adhesion (TLA), or mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO), before undergoing palatoplasty.
Main Outcome Measures
Primary outcomes are airway and non-airway related complications after palatoplasty based on prior UAO management: conservative (n = 30), TLA (n = 14), or MDO (n = 14). Secondary outcomes included severity of complications and a cost comparison of PICU versus floor care.
Results
The median age at palatoplasty was 12.9 months [interquartile range: 10.8-15.6]. Airway complications occurred in 31% of patients: conservative (20.0%), TLA (35.7%), and MDO (50.0%) (P = .129). Non-airway complications were observed in 22.4% of patients: conservative (26.7%), TLA (7.1%), and MDO (28.6%) (P = .320). Most complications were minor in severity. Pediatric intensive care unit admission rates were significantly higher for TLA and MDO groups (85.7% each) compared to conservative (33.3%; P < .001). Pediatric intensive care unit care was associated with a 72.1% increase in total costs compared to floor care.
Conclusion
Airway and non-airway complications are common following palatoplasty in RS patients. Appropriate UAO management during infancy results in equally safe post-palatoplasty airway and non-airway complications. Since most complications are minor, admitting medically stable patients to the surgical floor rather than the PICU may reduce costs and conserve resources without compromising care.
IzumiKKonczalLLMitchellALJonesMC. Underlying genetic diagnosis of Pierre Robin sequence: retrospective chart review at two children’s hospitals and a systematic literature review. J Pediatr. 2012;160(4):645–650.e2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.09.021
2.
RobinPDehghanKHutchinsonRLKlawBA. A fall of the base of the tongue considered as a new cause of nasopharyngeal respiratory impairment: Pierre Robin sequence, a translation. 1923. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93(6):1301–1303.
3.
PoetsCFBacherM. Treatment of upper airway obstruction and feeding problems in Robin-like phenotype. J Pediatr. 2012;160(4):645–650.e2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.09.021
KapoorEMantilla-RivasERanaMSAivazMDuarte-BatemanDEscandónJMCrowderHRManriqueMRogersGFOhAK. Facial nerve dysfunction after mandibular distraction osteogenesis in patients with Robin sequence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023;60(4):395–404. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211070728
6.
AlmajedAViezel-MathieuAGilardinoMSFloresRLTholpadySSCôtéA. Outcome following surgical interventions for micrognathia in infants with Pierre Robin sequence: a systematic review of the literature. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(1):32–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/15-282
7.
GreathouseSTCostaMFerreraATahiriYTholpadySSHavlikRJFloresRL. The surgical treatment of Robin sequence. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77(4):413–419. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000630
8.
ResnickCMCalabreseCESahdevRPadwaBL. Is tongue-lip adhesion or mandibular distraction more effective in relieving obstructive apnea in {infants} with Robin sequence?J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77(3):591–600. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.09.001
9.
ZhangRSHoppeICTaylorJABartlettSP. Surgical management and outcomes of Pierre Robin sequence: a comparison of mandibular distraction osteogenesis and tongue-lip adhesion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(2):480–509. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004581
10.
Caouette-LabergeLBayetBLarocqueY. The Pierre Robin sequence: review of 125 cases and evolution of treatment modalities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93(5):934–942.
11.
MurageKPTholpadySSFrielMHavlikRJFloresRL. Outcomes analysis of mandibular distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of Pierre Robin sequence. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(2):419–421. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182958a54
12.
PrintzlauAAndersenM. Pierre Robin sequence in Denmark: a retrospective population-based epidemiological study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;41(1):47–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/02-055
13.
GiudiceABaroneSBelhousKMoriceASoupreVBennardoFBoddaertNVazquezM-PAbadieVPicardA. Pierre Robin sequence: a comprehensive narrative review of the literature over time. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;119(5):419–428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JORMAS.2018.05.002
14.
RobisonJGOttesonTD. Increased prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with cleft palate. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;137(3):269–274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2011.8
15.
CostaMAMurageKPTholpadySSFloresRL. Airway compromise following palatoplasty in Robin sequence: improving safety and predictability. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(6):937e–945e. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000729
SullivanNATLachkarNDon GriotJPWKruisingaFHLeeuwenburgh-PronkWGBroersCJMBreugemCC. Respiratory outcomes after cleft palate closure in Robin sequence: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(5). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/S00784-024-05647-W
18.
WoodBCBoyajianMJZurakowskiDRogersGFOhAK. Evaluating the need for routine admission following primary cleft palate repair: an analysis of 100 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(4):502e–510e. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001583
WhitakerISGulatiVRossGLMenonAOngTK. Variations in the postoperative management of free tissue transfers to the head and neck in the United Kingdom. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;45(1):16–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.11.021
21.
McGrathJLMantilla-RivasEAivazMManriqueMRanaMSCrowderHROhNSRogersGFOhAK. Predicting failure of conservative airway management in infants with Robin sequence: the EARN factors. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025;62(4):610–618. Published online 2024. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231224194
22.
AivazMMantilla-RivasERanaMSMcGrathJLCrowderHRSteinJOh.NManriqueMRogersGFOhAK. Predicting failure of conservative airway management in Robin sequence. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9(10S):45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.GOX.0000799316.69215.30
23.
AlbinoFPWoodBCHanKDYiSSeruyaMRogersGFOhAK. Clinical factors associated with the non-operative airway management of patients with Robin sequence. Arch Plast Surg. 2016;43(6):506–511. doi:https://doi.org/10.5999/APS.2016.43.6.506
24.
RogersGFMurthyASLabrieRAMullikenJB. The GILLS score: part I. Patient selection for tongue-lip adhesion in Robin sequence. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(1):243–251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0B013E318217420D
OpdenakkerYSwennenGPottelLAbeloosJNagyK. Postoperative respiratory complications after cleft palate closure in patients with Pierre Robin sequence: operative considerations. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(8):1950–1954. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003995
KalmarCLPatelVAZapateroZDKosykMSTaylorJA. Optimal timing of palatoplasty in infants with comorbidities. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021;58(8):937–942. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665620976249
30.
KosykMSCarlsonARZapateroZDKalmarCLSwansonJWBartlettSPTaylorJA. Cleft palate repair in Robin sequence following mandibular distraction osteogenesis compared to tongue-lip adhesion. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023;60(2):151–158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211055019
31.
RohrichRJRowsellARJohnsDFruryMAGriegGWatsonDJGodfreyAMPooleMD. Timing of hard palatal closure: a critical long-term analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98(2):236–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199608000-00005
32.
ShafferADFordMDLoseeJEGoldsteinJCostelloBJGrunwaldtLJJabbourN. The association between age at palatoplasty and speech and language outcomes in children with cleft palate: an observational chart review study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(2):148–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665619882566
33.
HenrikssonTGSkoogVT. Identification of children at high anaesthetic risk at the time of primary palatoplasty. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2001;35(2):177–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/028443101300165318
34.
WoodFM. Hypoxia: another issue to consider when timing cleft repair. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;32(1):15–19.
35.
ApaydinAYazdirduyevBCanTKeklikogluN. Soft tissue changes during distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(4):408–412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.11.007
36.
MackoolRJHopperRAGraysonBHHollidayRMcCarthyJG. Volumetric change of the medial pterygoid following distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: an example of the associated soft-tissue changes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(6):1804–1807. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000055431.19215.0A
37.
PrescherHFroimsonJRHaravuPNReidRR. Impact of cleft palate on tongue-based upper airway obstruction in Pierre Robin sequence: implications for mandibular distraction osteogenesis and timing of cleft palate repair. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(2):459–462. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008178
38.
HumphriesLSRoyTHuangACollinsJBaroodyFMReidRR. Airway morphological changes in Pierre Robin sequence: a retrospective stud. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(7):828–839. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665619900624
39.
FloresRLTholpadySSSatiSFairbanksGSocasJChoiMHavlikRJ. The surgical correction of Pierre Robin sequence: mandibular distraction osteogenesis versus tongue-lip adhesion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(6):1433–1439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000225
40.
ScottARShumrickCMHusseinMEbertBESchnellARobyBB. Unplanned intensive care unit admission following cleft palate repair by head and neck surgeons. Otolaryngol–Head Neck Surg. 2022;168(4):688–695. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998221119730
41.
Van LieshoutMJSJoostenKFMMathijssenIMJKoudstaalMJHoeveHLJvan der SchroeffMPWolviusEB. Robin sequence: a European survey on current practice patterns. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(8):1626–1631. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.07.008
42.
CollaresMVMDuarteDWSobralDSPortinhoCPFallerGJFragaMM. Neonatal mandibular distraction osteogenesis reduces cleft palate width and lengthens soft palate, influencing palatoplasty in patients with Pierre Robin sequence. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(5):1267–1272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002752
43.
PapoffPGuelfiGCicchettiRCarestaECozziDAMorettiCMidullaFMianoSCerasaroCCasconeP. Outcomes after tongue-lip adhesion or mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants with Pierre Robin sequence and severe airway obstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42(11):1418–1423. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJOM.2013.07.747
44.
Viezel-MathieuASafranTGilardinoMS. A systematic review of the effectiveness of tongue lip adhesion in improving airway obstruction in children with Pierre Robin sequence. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(6):1453–1456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002721
45.
GeitonaMAndroutsouLTheodoratouD. Cost estimation of patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a case study of the Teaching University Hospital of Thessaly. J Med Econ. 2010;13(2):179–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.3111/13696991003684092
46.
Aponte-OrtizJAGreenberg-WorisekAJMarinelliJPMayMSpearsGMLabottJRMechamJCMooreEJVisscherSLBorahBJ,et al.Cost and clinical outcomes of postoperative intensive care unit versus general floor management in head and neck free flap reconstructive surgery patients. Am J Otolaryngol. 2021;42(5):103029. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103029
47.
BeauregardCLFriedmanWA. Routine use of postoperative ICU care for elective craniotomy: a cost-benefit analysis. Surg Neurol. 2003;60(6):483–489; dicussion 489. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-3019(03)00517-2
48.
AlshaikhHNHicksCWDiBritoSRZarkowskyDSSiracuseJJMalasMB. Elective infrainguinal lower extremity bypass for claudication is associated with high postoperative intensive care utilization. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(6):1863–1873.e1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.182
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
