Abstract
Objective
To evaluate trends in gender representation, academic productivity, and training background among craniofacial surgery fellows over the past 12 years and assess changes in the academic expectations for entry into craniofacial fellowship.
Design
Retrospective cohort study of craniofacial fellowship graduates (2014-2025).
Setting
Online public records review.
Participants
A total of 194 craniofacial fellows.
Main Outcome Measures
Gender distribution, lifetime publication counts (total, first-, second-, senior-author roles), conference presentations, training pathway, and time from medical school to fellowship.
Results
Among 194 fellows, 35% were women. Female representation increased from 27% in the early cohort (2014-2019) to 43% in the later cohort (2020-2025). Overall, men had more total (30.2 vs 21.3, P = .038), second-author (5.7 vs 3.9, P = .011), and senior-author (4.4 vs 2.9, P = .040) publications. Gender gaps in publication output were not present in the most recent time period (2019-2024). More recent graduates had significantly higher prefellowship publication counts than earlier cohorts. Integrated trainees and U.S.-trained surgeons had higher preresidency publication counts and shorter training durations. Panel presentation rates remained modestly male-dominated in recent years, though overall conference representation showed no gender differences.
Conclusions
The most recent cohort of craniofacial fellows demonstrates encouraging progress toward gender parity in representation, academic productivity, and conference participation. This reflects meaningful progress over the past decade and suggests that equity at the trainee level is emerging. Continued investment in mentorship, visibility, and support will help carry this momentum into faculty advancement and leadership roles.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
