Evaluate feasibility of a study to measure emergent language and pre-speech skills in infants with and without oral cleft. Functioning was assessed in relation to nighttime oxygenation and neural structure.
Design
Observational, case/control study.
Setting
Data was obtained at two clinical settings (University of Iowa and University of Pittsburgh Children's Hospital).
Participants
Twenty infants with and without oral cleft were enrolled and evaluated at 2 months of age. Seven additional infants the same age with a subset of measures from an earlier study were also included. The combined sample included 27 participants: 5 with cleft lip only (iCL), 8 with cleft lip and palate (iCLP), and 14 unaffected (UA).
Main Outcome Measures
Parent ratings of general functioning and emergent language (Bayley-4 SEABQ), acoustic measures of vocalizations, overnight pulse oximetry, and structural Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.
Results
Success rates for measures were high for emergent language and vocal acoustics (100% and 89%, respectively) and moderate for oximetry and MRI scans (63% and 70%, respectively). Participants with iCLP had the lowest outcomes for emergent language and vocal acoustics, as well as the highest number of desaturations and lowest myelin intensity.
Conclusions
The results of this study a) support feasibility of obtaining pre-speech, oxygenation, and neural measures in early infancy, b) identify patterns of higher risk for participants with iCLP, c) and suggest that some neural differences may be present prior to exposure to anesthesia.
SmariusBJAHaverkampSde WildeHvan Wijck-WarnaarAMink van der MolenABBreugemCC. Incidence of cleft-related speech problems in children with an isolated cleft lip. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(3):823-831. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03367-5
2.
JocelynLJPenkoMARodeHL. Cognition, communication, and hearing in young children with cleft lip and palate and in control children: A longitudinal study. Pediatrics. 1996;97(4):529-534.
3.
ConradALCrilly BellucciCHeppnerCE, et al.Screening for academic risk among students with cleft lip and/or palate: Patterns of risk and qualities of effective tools. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024;61(1):68-78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656221116008
4.
FitzsimonsKJDeaconSACopleyLPParkMHMedinaJvan der MeulenJH. School absence and achievement in children with isolated orofacial clefts. Arch Dis Child. 2021;106(2):154-159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-319123
5.
BergESivertsenAAriansenAM, et al.Socio-economic status and reproduction among adults born with an oral cleft: A population-based cohort study in Norway. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0162196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162196
6.
KellySNShearerJ. Appearance and speech satisfaction and their associations with psychosocial difficulties among young people with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(8):1008-1017. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665620926083
7.
SalineroLKRomeoDJPontellME, et al.Psychosocial status and self-perception in patients with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241236369. Online ahead of print.
8.
FlynnTMollerCJonssonRLohmanderA. The high prevalence of otitis media with effusion in children with cleft lip and palate as compared to children without clefts. Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.2009;73(10):1441-1446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.07.015
9.
van EedenS. The relationship between auditory behaviours and speech and language development in children with cleft lip and palate. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.2023;31(3):165-170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000883
10.
BotticelliSKuselerAMolstedK, et al.Influence of infant cleft dimensions on velopharyngeal function in 5-year-old Danish children born with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(4):420-429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665619874143
11.
GustafssonCHeliovaaraALeikolaJRautioJ. Incidence of speech-correcting surgery in children with isolated cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(8):1115-1121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665618760889
12.
PerryJLSnodgrassTDGilbertIRWilliamsJLSinghDJSitzmanTJ. The levator veli palatini: Are all segments created equal?Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025;62(1):28-34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241271666
13.
SitzmanTJWilliamsJLSinghDJTemkitMSnodgrassTDPerryJL. Magnetic resonance imaging of the velopharynx: Clinical findings in patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;153(6):1155e-1168e. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010798
14.
MasonKN. The effect of dental and occlusal anomalies on articulation in individuals with cleft lip and/or cleft palate. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2020;5(6):1492-1504.
15.
VallinoLDTompsonB. Perceptual characteristics of consonant errors associated with malocclusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;51(8):850-856. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-2391(10)80101-6
16.
HaS. The levator veli palatini muscle in cleft palate anatomy and its implications for assessing velopharyngeal function: A literature review. Korean J Commun Disord. 2007;12(1):77-89.
17.
KuehnDPEttemaSLGoldwasserMSBarkmeierJC. Magnetic resonance imaging of the levator veli palatini muscle before and after primary palatoplasty. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;41(6):584-592. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/03-060.1
18.
MasonKNGampperTBlackJ. Levator veli palatini muscle ratio is a clinically significant anatomic predictor for velopharyngeal surgical need. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025;62(2):250-262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241298833
19.
MasonKNPerryJL. Relationship between age and diagnosis on volumetric and linear velopharyngeal measures in the cleft and noncleft populations. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(5):1340-1345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002744
20.
LaubDRJr.WilliamsRK. Neonatal anesthesia neurotoxicity: A review for cleft and craniofacial surgeons. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015;52(4):494-498. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/14-126
KjaerI. Human prenatal craniofacial development related to brain development under normal and pathologic conditions. Acta Odontol Scand. 1995;53(3):135-143.
23.
SperberGH. First year of life: Prenatal craniofacial development. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29(2):109-111.
24.
Jevtovic-TodorovicVHartmanREIzumiY, et al.Early exposure to common anesthetic agents causes widespread neurodegeneration in the developing rat brain and persistent learning deficits. J Neurosci. 2003;23(3):876-882.
25.
WarnerDOZaccarielloMJKatusicSK, et al.Neuropsychological and behavioral outcomes after exposure of young children to procedures requiring general anesthesia: The mayo anesthesia safety in kids (MASK) study. Anesthesiology. 2018;129(1):89-105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002232
26.
BlockRIMagnottaVABaymanEOChoiJYThomasJJKimbleKK. Are anesthesia and surgery during infancy associated with decreased white matter integrity and volume during childhood?Anesthesiology. 2017;127(5):788-799. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001808
27.
ConradALGoodwinJWChoiJBlockRINopoulosP. The relationship of exposure to anesthesia on outcomes in children with isolated oral clefts. J Child Neurol. 2017;32(3):308-315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073816681257
28.
ConradALAlbertMCrerandCE, et al.Retrospective evaluation of number of surgeries and parent ratings of academic and behavioral functioning among children with isolated oral clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021;58(10):1294-1303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665620982807
29.
CieloCMTaylorJAVossoughA, et al.Evolution of obstructive sleep apnea in infants with cleft palate and micrognathia. J Clin Sleep Med. 2016;12(7):979-987. doi:https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.5930
30.
Nicholas JungbauerWPouporeNSNguyenSACarrollWWPechaPP. Obstructive sleep apnea in children with nonsyndromic cleft palate: A systematic review. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(8):2063-2068. doi:https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.10020
31.
Lo BueASalvaggioAInsalacoG. Obstructive sleep apnea in developmental age. A narrative review. Eur J Pediatr. 2020;179(3):357-365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-019-03557-8
32.
SmithCBWalkerKBadawiNWatersKAMacLeanJE. Impact of sleep and breathing in infancy on outcomes at three years of age for children with cleft lip and/or palate. Sleep. 2014;37(5):919-925. doi:https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.3660
33.
BurdiAR. Developmental biology and morphogenesis of the face, lip, and palate. In: BerkowitzS, ed. Cleft lip and palate. 2nd ed.Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2006:3-12.
34.
YangFFMcPhersonBShuHXieNXiangK. Structural abnormalities of the central auditory pathway in infants with non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2012;49(2):137–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/11-014
35.
ConradALWermkeKEisenmannM, et al.Preliminary evaluation of pre-speech and neurodevelopmental measures in 7-11 week old infants with isolated oral clefts. Pediatr Res.2021;89(1):85-90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-0887-5
36.
NopoulosPLangbehnDRCanadyJMagnottaVRichmanL. Abnormal brain structure in children with isolated clefts of the lip or palate. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(8):753-758.
37.
KuhlmannEvan der PlasEAxelsonEConradAL. Brain developmental trajectories in children and young adults with isolated cleft lip and/or cleft palate. Dev Neuropsychol. 2021;46(4):314-326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2021.1946691
38.
NopoulosPBergSCanadyJRichmanLVan DemarkDAndreasenNC. Structural brain abnormalities in adult males with clefts of the lip and/or palate. Genet Med.2002;4(1):1-9.
39.
Sandor-BajuszKASadiAVargaECsabiGAntonoglouGNLohnerS. The brain in oral clefting: A systematic review with meta-analyses. Front Neuroanat. 2022;16:863900. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2022.863900
40.
ConradAGoodwinJ. White matter tracts in children with isolated oral clefts: relationship to word reading accuracy. Presented at: American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association Annual Meeting and Symposia, May 2023, Raleigh, NC.
41.
NopoulosPBergSVanDemarkDRichmanLCanadyJAndreasenNC. Cognitive dysfunction in adult males with non-syndromic clefts of the lip and/or palate. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(12):2178-2184.
42.
ConradALKuhlmannEvan der PlasEAxelsonE. Brain structure and neural activity related to reading in boys with isolated oral clefts. Child Neuropsychol. 2021;27(5):621-640. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2021.1879765
43.
NopoulosPBoesADJabinesA, et al.Hyperactivity, impulsivity, and inattention in boys with cleft lip and palate: Relationship to ventromedial prefrontal cortex morphology. J Neurodev Disord. 2010;2(4):235-242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11689-010-9060-5
44.
BoesADMurkoVWoodJL, et al.Social function in boys with cleft lip and palate: Relationship to ventral frontal cortex morphology. Behav Brain Res. 2007;181(2):224-231.
45.
ConradALDaileySRichmanL, et al.Cerebellum structure differences and relationship to speech in boys and girls with nonsyndromic cleft of the lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2010;47(5):469-475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/08-228
46.
ShehanJNDanisDO3rdBainsABasaKMarstonAPLeviJR. Cleft palate in newborns diagnosed with prematurity. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;165(6):887-894. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998211002148
EpsteinNBaldwinLBishopD. The McMaster family assessment device. J Marital Fam Ther.1983;9(2):171-180.
49.
BayleyNAylwardG. Bayley scales of infant and toddler development, fourth edition (Bayley-4). San Antonio, TX: Pearson; 2019.
50.
BoersmaPWeeninkD. PRAAT. Doing phonetics by computer. 2011.
51.
WermkeKLeisingDStellzig-EisenhauerA. Relation of melody complexity in infants’ cries to language outcome in the second year of life: A longitudinal study. Clin Linguist Phon. 2007;21(11-12):961-973. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200701659243
52.
AntonovNKRuzal-ShapiroCBMorelKD, et al.Feed and wrap MRI technique in infants. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017;56(12):1095-1103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922816677806
53.
VolkowNDGordonJABianchiDW, et al.The healthy brain and child development study (HBCD): NIH collaboration to understand the impacts of prenatal and early life experiences on brain development. Dev Cogn Neurosci.2024;69:101423. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101423
PipitoneJParkMTWinterburnJ, et al.Multi-atlas segmentation of the whole hippocampus and subfields using multiple automatically generated templates. Neuroimage. 2014;101:494-512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.054
56.
AlexanderBLohWYMatthewsLG, et al.Desikan-Killiany-Tourville atlas compatible version of M-CRIB neonatal parcellated whole brain atlas: The M-CRIB 2.0. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:34. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00034
57.
AlexanderBMurrayALLohWY, et al.A new neonatal cortical and subcortical brain atlas: The Melbourne children's regional infant brain (M-CRIB) atlas. Neuroimage. 2017;147:841-851. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.068
58.
KleinATourvilleJ. 101 Labeled brain images and a consistent human cortical labeling protocol. Front Neurosci. 2012;6:171. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00171
59.
AvantsBBTustisonNSongGGeeJC2009.ANTs: Advanced normalization tools. Transac Med Imagins Penn Image Computer Sci Lab. http://stnava.github.io/ANTs/. Accessed 04/28/2025
60.
ManjonJVCoupePMarti-BonmatiLCollinsDLRoblesM. Adaptive non-local means denoising of MR images with spatially varying noise levels. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;31(1):192-203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22003
AvantsBBTustisonNJSongGCookPAKleinAGeeJC. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. Neuroimage. 2011;54(3):2033-2044. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025
63.
WangHSuhJWDasSRPlutaJBCraigeCYushkevichPA. Multi-atlas segmentation with joint label fusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2013;35(3):611-623. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2012.143
64.
GlasserMFVan EssenDC. Mapping human cortical areas in vivo based on myelin content as revealed by T1- and T2-weighted MRI. J Neurosci. 2011;31(32):11597-11616. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2180-11.2011
65.
RillingJKGlasserMFJbabdiSAnderssonJPreussTM. Continuity, divergence, and the evolution of brain language pathways. Front Evol Neurosci. 2011;3:11. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnevo.2011.00011
66.
LancasterHSLienKMChowJCFreyJRSchererNJKaiserAP. Early speech and language development in children with nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate: A meta-analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020;63(1):14-31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00162
67.
DeatherageJBourgeoisTO'BrienMBaylisAL. Examining risk of speech-language disorders in children with cleft lip. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(2):395-399. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008000
68.
WermkeKBirrMVoelterC, et al.Cry melody in 2-month-old infants with and without clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011;48(3):321-330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/09-055
Moraleda-CibrianMEdwardsSPKastenSJWarschauskySABuchmanSRO'BrienLM. Association between habitual snoring, middle ear disease, and speech problems in young children with non-syndromic cleft palate anomalies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;51(3):332-337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2021.07.003
71.
GascoigneDAMinhajMMAksenovDP. Neonatal anesthesia and oxidative stress. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11(4):787-808. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11040787
72.
NiuYYanJJiangH. Anesthesia and developing brain: What have we learned from recent studies. Front Mol Neurosci. 2022;15:1017578. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2022.1017578
73.
KamassajJAinaTHuauserJ. Asthma anesthesia. StatPerls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
