Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Novel Virtual Reality Simulator for Cleft Palate Surgery Training: An Assessment of Educational Feasibility and Traction Among Plastic Surgery Residents
To evaluate learners’ acceptance of multiuser virtual reality (VR) simulation platform while practicing the Furlow repair technique for cleft palate reconstruction.
Design
Nonrandomized with pre- and postsurveys.
Setting
Tertiary care institution's Department of Surgery September 2023 through August 2024.
Participants
Twenty plastic surgery residents from level PGY1 to PGY6 from a single institution.
Interventions
Multiuser Meta Quest 2 VR simulation-based workshop with an expert surgeon demonstrating a Furlow cleft palate repair. Feedback included audio and visual.
Main outcome measures
Learner confidence in using VR as a tool for surgical education, understanding of the Furlow technique, and opinion regarding the incorporation of VR into surgical and medical education. Satisfaction as measured by the Student Evaluation of Educational Quality questionnaire survey with a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree).
Results
20 residents participated in this study, of which 65% had previously participated in a cleft palate repair and 40% had used VR. After the simulation, trainees’ confidence in using VR as a tool for surgical education, understanding of the Furlow technique, and opinion regarding the incorporation of VR into surgical and medical education significantly increased (P < .05). Trainees found the simulation stimulating (4.85 ± 0.67), interesting (4.45 ± 0.83), clear (4.60 ± 0.82), an effective teaching tool (4.75 ± 0.44) and would recommend it to others (4.90 ± 0.31). Participants reported that they would feel somewhat comfortable repeating the simulation alone (3.95 ± 1.05).
Conclusion
Multiuser VR-based simulation workshops can significantly increase learners’ confidence and skills in the Furlow technique and promote positive opinions regarding VR as an educational tool. Learners considered this platform effective and stimulating and would recommend it as an educational tool.
SalariNDarvishiNHeydariMBokaeeSDarvishiFMohammadiM. Global prevalence of cleft palate, cleft lip and cleft palate and lip: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;123(2):110–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2021.05.008
2.
PutriFAPattamattaMAnitaSESMaulinaT. The global occurrences of cleft lip and palate in pediatric patients and their association with demographic factors: A narrative review. Children. 2024;11(3):322. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/children11030322
3.
LohmanderAPerssonCOwman-MollP. Unrepaired clefts in the hard palate: Speech deficits at the ages of 5 and 7 years and their relationship to size of the cleft. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2002;36(6):332–339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/028443102321096320
4.
MasareiAGSellDHabelAMarsMSommerladBCWadeA. The nature of feeding in infants with unrepaired cleft lip and/or palate compared with healthy noncleft infants. Cleft Palate Craniofacial J. 2007;44(3):321–328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/05-185
5.
SalineroLKRomeoDJPontellMEFriedmanLAhluwaliaVSWagnerCSBarreroCENapoliJJacksonOALowDW, et al.Psychosocial Status and self-perception in patients with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J Off Publ Am Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Assoc. Published online March 4, 2024:10556656241236369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241236369
6.
AkhtarKSNChenAStandfieldNJGupteCM. The role of simulation in developing surgical skills. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014;7(2):155–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-014-9209-z
PlanaNMRifkinWJKantarRSDavidJAMalihaSGFarberSJStaffenberg DAGraysonBHDiaz-SisoRJFloresRL, et al.A prospective, randomized, blinded trial comparing digital simulation to textbook for cleft surgery education. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(1):202–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005093
9.
PalDTaywadeMGopiK. Experiential learning: How pedagogy is changing in medical education. Curr Med Issues. 2022;20(3):198. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/cmi.cmi_35_22
10.
GuzePA. Using technology to meet the challenges of medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2015;126:260–270.
11.
LaVelleBAMcLaughlinJJ. Simulation-based education improves patient safety in ambulatory care. In: HenriksenKBattlesJBKeyesMAGradyML, eds. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 3: Performance and Tools). Advances in Patient Safety. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008. Accessed November 26, 2024. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43667/
12.
KantarRSAlfonsoARRamlyEPCohenORifkinWJMalihaSGDiaz-SisoRJEisemannBSSaadehPBFloresRL, et al.Knowledge and skills acquisition by plastic surgery residents through digital simulation training: A prospective, randomized, blinded trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(1):184e. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006375
13.
FloresRLDeMossPKleneCHavlikRJTholpadyS. Digital animation versus textbook in teaching plastic surgery techniques to novice learners. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(1):101e–109e. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182910aa9
14.
KantarRSPlanaNMCuttingCBDiaz-SisoJRFloresRL. Internet-Based digital simulation for cleft surgery education: A 5-year assessment of demographics, usage, and global effect. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(4):1120–1126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.12.003
15.
LasproMGroysmanLVerzellaANKimberlyLLFloresRL. The use of virtual reality in surgical training: Implications for education, patient safety, and global health equity. Surgeries. 2023;4(4):635–646. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries4040061
16.
MorcheJMathesTPieperD. Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0376-4
17.
GuzmanKJGemoNMartinsDBSantosPDeUgarteDAAdemoFKulberDIssufoC. Current challenges of plastic surgical care in sub-saharan Africa (Maputo, Mozambique). Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(8):e1893. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001893
18.
MaoRQLanLKayJLohreRAyeniORGoelDPde SaD.Immersive virtual reality for surgical training: A systematic review. J Surg Res. 2021;268:40–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.06.045
19.
CevallosNZukotynskiBGreigDSilvaMThompsonRM. The utility of virtual reality in orthopedic surgical training. J Surg Educ. 2022;79(6):1516–1525. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.06.007
20.
VerzellaANDiazALLasproMAlconASchechterJOlikerAArnoldAFloresRL.Virtual reality simulation of airway management post-cleft palate surgery: A model for sustainable and equitable education. Cleft Palate Craniofacial J. Published online March 28, 2024:10556656241241128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241241128
21.
BolsterLRourkeL. The effect of restricting Residents’ duty hours on patient safety, resident well-being, and resident education: An updated systematic review. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(3):349–363. doi:https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-14-00612.1
22.
ValsamisEMCollinsGSPinedo-VillanuevaRWhitehouseMRRanganMRSayersAReesJL. Association between surgeon volume and patient outcomes after elective shoulder replacement surgery using data from the national joint registry and hospital episode statistics for England: Population based cohort study. Br Med J. 2023;381:e075355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-075355
23.
SayadiLRNaidesAEngMFijanyAChopanMSayadiJJShaterianABanyardDAEvansGRDVyasR, et al.The new frontier: A review of augmented reality and virtual reality in plastic surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(9):1007–1016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz043
24.
AhlbergGEnochssonLGallagherAGHedmanLHogmanCMcCluskyDARamelSSmithDCArvidssonD.Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg. 2007;193(6):797–804. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.050
25.
AïmFLonjonGHannoucheDNizardR. Effectiveness of virtual reality training in orthopaedic surgery. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc. 2016;32(1):224–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.07.023
26.
SeymourNE. VR to OR: A review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance. World J Surg. Wiley Online Library. 2008. Accessed December 4, 2024. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1007/s00268-007-9307-9
27.
LohreRBoisAJPollockJWLapnerPMcIlquhamKAthwalGSGoelDP.Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality on orthopedic surgical skills and knowledge acquisition among senior surgical residents: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12):e2031217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31217
28.
WalbronPCommonHThomazeauHHosseiniKPeduzziLBulaidYSirveauxF.Virtual reality simulator improves the acquisition of basic arthroscopy skills in first-year orthopedic surgery residents. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR. 2020;106(4):717–724. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2020.03.009
29.
ThomsenASSBach-HolmDKjærboHHøjgaard-OlsenKSubhiYSalehGMYoon SooPla CourMKongeL.Operating room performance improves after proficiency-based virtual reality cataract surgery training. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(4):524–531. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.11.015
30.
ReinschluesselAVMuenderTSalzmannDDöringTMalakaRWeyheD. Virtual reality for surgical planning – evaluation based on two liver tumor resections. Front Surg. 2022;9. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.821060
31.
LaskayNMBGeorgeJAKnowlinLChangTPJohnstonJMGodzikJ. Optimizing surgical performance using preoperative virtual reality planning: A systematic review. World J Surg. 2023;47(10):2367–2377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07064-8
32.
UjiieHChibaRYamaguchiANomuraSShiyaHFujiwara-KurodaAKagaKEitelCClappTKatoT.Developing a virtual reality simulation system for preoperative planning of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery. J Clin Med. 2024;13(2):611. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020611
33.
CenJLiufuRWenSQiuHLiuXChenXYuanHHuangMZhuangJ.Three-Dimensional printing, virtual reality and mixed reality for pulmonary atresia: Early surgical outcomes evaluation. Heart Lung Circ. 2021;30(2):296–302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2020.03.017
34.
ShirkJDThielDDWallenEMLinehanJMWhiteWMBadaniKKPorterJR.Effect of 3-dimensional virtual reality models for surgical planning of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy on surgical outcomes: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(9):e1911598. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11598
35.
ChouDWAnnadataVWillsonGGrayMRosenbergJ. Augmented and virtual reality applications in facial plastic surgery: A scoping review. Laryngoscope. 2024;134(6):2568–2577. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31178
36.
Parvin-NejadFPHoffmanGSPadmanabanVNwomehBCMshelbwalaPMBennehAYSifriZC.Surgical subspecialists in West Africa: Workforce size, training opportunities, and contributing factors. Surgery. 2021;170(2):478–484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.04.018
37.
Olapade-OlaopaEOOtegbayoJADaniaSSoyannwoOAAdeniyiFAA. Study processes of first year clinical students of the College Of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan Nigeria. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2006;35(4):431–435.
38.
AndersonFWJMutchnickIKwawukumeEYDansoKAKlufioCAClintonYYunLLJohnsonTRB.Who will be there when women deliver? Assuring retention of obstetric providers. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(5):1012–1016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000287064.63051.1c
39.
MearaJGLeatherAJMHaganderLAlkireBCAlonsoNAmehEABicklerSWContehLDareAJDaviesJ, et al.Global Surgery 2030: Evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016;25:75–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.09.006
Ramaseri ChandraANEl JamiyFRezaH. A systematic survey on cybersickness in virtual environments. Computers. 2022;11(4):51. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/computers11040051
KantarRSHamdanUSMullerJNHemalKYounanRAHaddadMMelhemAMDon GriotPWBreugemCCMokdadAH, et al.Global prevalence and burden of orofacial clefts: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. J Craniofac Surg. 2023;34(7):2012–2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000009591
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
