Abstract
Objective
There is a lack of formal training documented for service providers across disciplines regarding patients with cleft palate, resulting in a variety of informal training mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to characterize the training interdisciplinary providers have received related to feeding infants with cleft palate and generate ideas for future training mechanisms.
Design
Prospective, mixed methods survey
Setting
Feeding providers from ACPA approved cleft palate teams in North America
Participants
Providers of varying disciplines that regularly engaged in feeding services for infants with cleft palate and completed the first training-related question within the survey
Main Outcome Measures
Information on provider demographics and training
Results
Most respondents’ (56.6%) academic program did not include information regarding feeding infants with cleft palate, which was significantly higher (P < .001) for disciplines outside of speech-language pathology. Of all respondents, 81.6% received on-the-job training while 69.7% attended continuing education to acquire this information; significantly more speech-language pathologists (P < .001) reported attending continuing education than other disciplines. Conventions or conferences (44.7%) and materials (47.4%) from the ACPA were considered very helpful by those who pursued continuing education. Inductive content analysis revealed themes related to collaborating with other professionals, available research to guide practice, and graduate and postgraduate/professional training.
Conclusions
Inconsistencies in academic training within and across disciplines exist related to feeding infants with cleft palate. There are several opportunities to expand continuing education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
