This study compares mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) and tracheostomy in managing severe airway obstruction in patients with the Pierre Robin sequence (PRS).
Design
A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines was performed. Literature searches were conducted across PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Scopus, E.B.S.C.O., and Web of Science, including grey literature, covering studies until May 30, 2024. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Patients
patients with Pierre Robin Sequence.
Interventions
Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) and tracheostomy.
Main Outcome Measures
Primary outcomes included airway management (tracheostomy avoidance for MDO, decannulation for tracheostomy) and feeding outcomes (G-tube placement). Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay and associated costs.
Results
Thirteen studies were included. MDO and the MDO-first approach demonstrated significantly better airway outcomes (OR = 10.72, 95% CI = 1.97–58.44, p = 0.006; OR = 4.51, 95% CI = 2.61–7.79, p < 0.00001). MDO also reduced the need for G-tube placement (OR = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.04–0.18, p < 0.00001) and lowered hospital costs (MD = -47.90 thousand USD, 95% CI = -59.93 to −35.87, p < 0.0001). A shorter hospital stay was observed but was not statistically significant.
Conclusions
MDO offers better airway outcomes, lower G-tube placement rates, and reduced costs, making it a preferred option. Larger studies within the same syndromic status are needed to minimize confounding factors and validate these findings.
CôtéAFanousAAlmajedALacroixY. Pierre robin sequence: Review of diagnostic and treatment challenges. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79(4):451–464. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.01.035
HanKDSeruyaMOhAKZalzalGHPreciadoDA. Natural” decannulation in patients with robin sequence and severe airway obstruction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012;121(1):44–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941212100108
5.
La-AnyaneOMWhitneyNBHarmonKAKarasAFJeffeJSTragosC. Tracheostomy, the not so definitive airway?: Tracheostomy morbidity in pediatric craniofacial patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2023;34(8):2413–2416. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000009627
6.
ThatcherGWMaiselRH. The long-term evaluation of tracheostomy in the management of severe obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope.2003;113(2):201–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200302000-00001
JarrahyR. Controversies in the management of neonatal micrognathia: To distract or not to distract, that is the question. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(1):243–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318241b90a
IzadiKYellonRMandellDL, et al.Correction of upper airway obstruction in the newborn with internal mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14(4):493–499. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200307000-00019
15.
CollinsBPowitzkyRRobledoCRoseCGladeR. Airway management in pierre robin sequence: Patterns of practice. Cleft Palate–Craniofacial J. 2014;51(3):283–289. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/12-214
16.
MaoZTianGShrivastavaMZhouJYeL. Complications of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants with isolated robin sequence. Children. 2023;10(10):1591. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/children10101591
17.
MurageKPCostaMAFrielMTHavlikRJTholpadySSFloresRL. Complications associated with neonatal mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of robin sequence. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(2):383–387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000640
18.
BreikOTiveyDUmapathysivamKAndersonP. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis for the management of upper airway obstruction in children with micrognathia: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(6):769–782. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.01.009
LiWYPoonACourtemancheD, et al.Airway management in pierre robin sequence: The Vancouver classification. Plast Surg. 2017;25(1):14–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2292550317693814
21.
AndrewsBTFanKLRoostaeianJFedericoCBradleyJP. Incidence of concomitant airway anomalies when using the university of California, Los Angeles, protocol for neonatal mandibular distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(5):1116–1123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865da0
22.
KohanEHazanySRoostaeianJ, et al.Economic advantages to a distraction decision tree model for management of neonatal upper airway obstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(5):1652–1664. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ef8e82
23.
DemkeJBassimMPatelMR, et al.Parental perceptions and morbidity: Tracheostomy and Pierre Robin sequence. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72(10):1509–1516. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.07.002
24.
ZaballaKSinghJWatersK. The management of upper airway obstruction in Pierre Robin sequence. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2023;45:11–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2022.07.001
25.
RunyanCMUribe-RiveraATorkS, et al.Management of airway obstruction in infants with Pierre Robin sequence. Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open. 2018;6(5):e1688. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001688
26.
GenecovDGBarcelóCRSteinbergDTroneTSperryE. Clinical experience with the application of distraction osteogenesis for airway obstruction. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(8):1817–1821. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181b6c1b0
27.
LamDJTabanginMEShikaryTA, et al.Outcomes of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of severe micrognathia. JAMA Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2014;140(4):338. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2014.16
28.
SmithMCSendersCW. Prognosis of airway obstruction and feeding difficulty in the robin sequence. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;70(2):319–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.07.003
29.
KolstadCKSendersCWRubinsteinBKTollefsonTT. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: At what age to proceed. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;75(11):1380–1384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.07.032
30.
MaggeHNSchildSDMantilla-RivasE, et al.Trends in natural decannulation in patients with robin sequence: A twenty-five year retrospective review. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2024;133(1):69–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894231187290
RunyanCMUribe-RiveraAKarleaA, et al.Cost analysis of mandibular distraction versus tracheostomy in neonates with Pierre Robin sequence. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2014;151(5):811–818. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599814542759
33.
Ali-KhanSRunyanCNardiniG, et al.Treacher collins syndrome and tracheostomy: Decannulation using mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;81(3):305–310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001514
34.
MandellDLYellonRFBradleyJPIzadiKGordonCB. Mandibular distraction for micrognathia and severe upper airway obstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2004;130(3):344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.130.3.344
35.
TibesarRJScottARMcNamaraCSampsonDLanderTASidmanJD. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible for airway obstruction in children: Long-term results. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2010;143(1):90–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2010.02.018
36.
SidmanJDSampsonDTempletonB. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible for airway obstruction in children. Laryngoscope.2001;111(7):1137–1146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200107000-00004
37.
El GhoulKCalabreseCEKoudstaalMJResnickCM. A comparison of airway interventions and gastrostomy tube placement in infants with robin sequence. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49(6):734–738. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.10.013
38.
MaceELKrishnapuraSGGolinkoMPhillipsJDBelcherRH. Pre-Operative characteristics helping to avoid gastrostomy tube after mandibular distraction in neonates with Pierre-Robin sequence: A institutional case-series and review of the literature. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2024;133(7):679–685. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894241249547
39.
BreikOUmapathysivamKTiveyDAndersonP. Feeding and reflux in children after mandibular distraction osteogenesis for micrognathia: A systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;85:128–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.03.033
40.
ResnickCMRottgersSAWrightJM, et al.Surgical outcome and treatment trends in 1289 infants with micrognathia: A multicenter cohort. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;154(1):155e–166e. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010639
41.
LidskyMELanderTASidmanJD. Resolving feeding difficulties with early airway intervention in Pierre Robin sequence. Laryngoscope.2008;118(1):120–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MLG.0b013e31815667f3
42.
KamKMcKayMMacLeanJWitmansMBSpierSMitchellI. Surgical versus nonsurgical interventions to relieve upper airway obstruction in children with Pierre Robin sequence. Can Respir J. 2015;22(3):171–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/798076
43.
PaesECFouchéJJMuradinMSMSpelemanLKonMBreugemCC. Tracheostomy versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants with robin sequence: A comparative cost analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;52(3):223–229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.11.017
44.
HongPBezuhlyMTaylorSMHartRDKearnsDBCorstenG. Tracheostomy versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis in Canadian children with Pierre Robin sequence: A comparative cost analysis. J Otolaryngol. 2012;41(3):207–214.
45.
GoudySJiramongolchaiPChinnaduraiS. Logistic regression analysis of Pierre Robin sequence patients requiring surgical intervention: Logistic regression model in PRS patients. Laryngoscope.2017;127(4):945–949. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26143
46.
Nazarian MobinSSFrancisCSKaratsonyiALHammoudehJAUrataMM. Mandibular distraction instead of tracheostomy in Pierre Robin sequence patients: Is it worth it?Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(5):766e–767e. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318267da28
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
