Profiling the Roles and Responsibilities of Professionals and Non-Professionals Providing Speech Language Services for Individuals with CLP in Resource-Limited Regions
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2025
Profiling the Roles and Responsibilities of Professionals and Non-Professionals Providing Speech Language Services for Individuals with CLP in Resource-Limited Regions
Fourteen Speech and Language Therapists/Pathologists (SLT/Ps) from 13 countries across 5 continents made up the International Confederation of Cleft Lip and Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies (ICCPCA) CLEFT 2022 Speech Taskforce. Following a group consensus activity led by an external facilitator using Lightning Design Thinking principles, “task-shifting” was identified as the topic for this Taskforce. Absence and scarcity of SLT/Ps in many parts of the world have led to non-SLT/Ps delivering speech and language therapy services to individuals with cleft lip +/− palate. This narrative is the first known attempt to develop a framework, describing the different types of providers and their scope of practice.
SchererNJ. Speech therapy where there are no speech therapists: The task force for the American cleft palate–craniofacial association. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2014;51(6):135-137. doi.org/10.1597/14-121
RobertsonSJKersnerMDavisS, eds. A History of the College 1945–1995. Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists; 1995.
6.
MorleyME. Cleft Palate and Speech. E & S Livingstone; 1945.
7.
American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. Parameters for evaluation and treatment of patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial differences. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2018;55(1):137-156. doi.org/10.1177/1055665617739564
8.
FitzsimonsDA. International confederation for cleft lip and palate and related craniofacial anomalies task force report: Speech assessment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2014;51(6):138-145. https://doi.org/10.1597/14-123
9.
GhabrialEBütowKWOlorunjuSAS. South African speech-language therapists’ opinion of their training in cleft lip and palate and craniofacial deformities. South African J Commun Disord. 2020;67(1):1-6. doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v67i1.695
10.
VallinoLDLassNJBunnellHTPannbackerM. Academic and clinical training in cleft palate for speech-language pathologists. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2008;45(4):371-380. doi.org/10.1597/07-119.1
11.
AlighieriCBettensKBruneelLD’haeseleerEVan GaeverEVan LierdeK. Effectiveness of speech intervention in patients with a cleft palate: Comparison of motor-phonetic versus linguistic-phonological speech approaches. J Speech Lang Hear Res.2020;63(12):3909-3933. doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00129
McGillNMcLeodS. Waiting list management in speech-language pathology: Translating research to practice. Speech, Language and Hearing. 2020;23(1):2-8. doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2020.1716471
15.
HaS. Effectiveness of a parent-implemented intervention program for young children with cleft palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.2015;79(5):707-715. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.02.023
16.
SaadMAJanJMWahidR. Parents’ linguistic strategies in interaction with their children with history of cleft lip and/or palate. Int J Lang Commun Disord.2021;56(5):940-953. doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12646
17.
SchererNJD’AntonioLLMcGaheyH. Early intervention for speech impairment in children with cleft palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2008;45(1):18-31. doi.org/10.1597/06-085.1
18.
SweeneyTHegartyFPowellKDeasyLReganMOSellD. Randomized controlled trial comparing parent led therapist supervised articulation therapy (PLAT) with routine intervention for children with speech disorders associated with cleft palate. Int J Lang Commun Disord.2020;55(5):639-660. doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12542
19.
SellDO’RourkeCSweeneyT. Parent experiences of undertaking therapy for cleft palate speech disorders following in-depth training. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups. 2023;8(5):969-985. doi.org/10.1044/2023_PERSP-22-00253
20.
LandisPThi-Thu-CucP. Articulation patterns and speech intelligibility of 54 Vietnamese children with unoperated oral clefts: Clinical observations and impressions. Cleft Palate J.1975;12(2):234-243.
21.
D’AntonioLLNagarajanR. Use of a consensus building approach to plan speech services for children with cleft palate in India. Folia Phoniatr Logop.2003;55(6):306-313. doi.org/10.1159/000073254
22.
WirtAWyattRSellDMarsMGrunwellPLamabadusuriyaS. Training counterparts in cleft palate speech therapy in the less developed world: An extended report. Br J Disord Commun. 1990;25(3):355-367. doi:10.3109/13682829009011983
23.
PrathaneeBDechongkitSManochiopinigS. Development of community-based speech therapy model: For children with cleft lip/palate in northeast Thailand. J Med Assoc Thail.2006;89(4):500-508.
24.
ShunmugamSSubramaniyanBNagarajanRHariharanSV. Effectiveness of a training program for community-based resource workers on cleft lip and palate and cleft speech. Journal of Cleft Lip Palate Craniofac Anomal. 2017;4(2):138-148. doi.org/10.4103/jclpca.jclpca
25.
PrathaneeBLorwatanapongsaPMakarabhiromKSuphawatjariyakulRThinnaithornRThanwiratananichP. Community-based model for speech therapy in Thailand: Implementation. J Med Assoc Thail.2010;93(4):1-6.
26.
D’AntonioL. Speech training symposium held in China. The Smile Train, Fast Track. 2002;3(3):7.
27.
Education Committee. IALP International Association of Communication Disorders and Sciences.
28.
BaigorriMCrowleyCSommerC. Addressing the gap in education for cleft palate: A module training series for craniofacial assessment and treatment. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups. 2020;5(3):662-668. doi.org/10.1044/2020_PERSP-19-00138
