Accuracy and Retention of Molding Plates Used for Infants with Cleft Lip and Palate Fabricated from Different Materials: A Cross-Sectional Clinical Study

Abstract

Objectives

The study aimed to comparatively assess the accuracy and retention of molding plates made of polyethylene terephthalate modified with glycol (PET-G) and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) materials, while also investigating the effect of adhesive addition on retention.

Design

A cross-sectional clinical study.

Patients/setting

The study included 30 infants diagnosed with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate (16 unilateral, 14 bilateral). Two molding plates were fabricated for each infant, and their accuracy and retention were evaluated. The data were analyzed using independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Wilcoxon rank tests.

Main outcome measures

Accuracy: The accuracy of the molding plates was assessed by measuring the virtual gap between the inner surface of the plates and their working cast using Exocad software. The accuracy was evaluated in different regions (anterior, middle, and posterior) and compared between PET-G and PMMA materials. Retention: The retention of the molding plates was measured using a digital force gauge, which recorded the force required to dislodge the plates from the infant's mouth. The retention was compared between PET-G and PMMA materials, as well as the effect of adhesive addition on retention. Overall adaptation; PET-G plates showed a significantly smaller gap (mean= 0.264 ±0.106) compared to PMMA (mean= 0.362 ±0.130). Region-specific adaptation: PET-G plates demonstrated better accuracy in all regions (means of anterior =0.246, middle =0.262, posterior =0.282 µm). Significant differences in accuracy were observed in the middle and posterior regions compared to PMMA. Retention assessment revealed that the PET-G groups (with or without adhesive) exhibited significantly higher retention compared to the PMMA groups (P<0.01).

Conclusion

PET-G plates demonstrated superior accuracy and retention compared to PMMA, with a significant difference observed in both accuracy and retention. Furthermore, the addition of denture adhesive had a positive effect on retention for both materials.