Vomer flap is a technique to close cleft lip and palate. This technique is a simple procedure that has many benefits. However, the vomer flap's application together with primary lip closure is still questionable.
Objective
To find out whether the vomer flap's application in primary cleft lip repair can provide significant benefits
Design
A systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA methodology has been licensed in PROSPERO databases (CRD42023399487).
Setting
A comprehensive search was set out, utilizing eight data sources up to March 2023.
Participants
Both cohort studies and randomized control trials regarding the use of vomer flaps performed concurrently with cleft lip repair in children up to six months old.
Results
This article involved 8 studies involving 542 patients who met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 6 retrospective cohort studies, 1 RCT study, and 1 prospective cohort study. Vomer flaps provide a reduction in palatal cleft distance of 3–5 mm, a relatively small number of fistulas (0–4%), improvement of velopharyngeal function (nasal tone and nasal emission), maximal development of the maxilla although it is still controversial.
Conclusion
The vomer flap's application in primary cleft lip repair provides many advantages, such as reduced palatal and alveolar clefts, decreased risk of oronasal fistula, increased velopharyngeal function, and increased maxillary growth. It is reliable for the management of cleft lip and palate.
OnahIOkoyeCBalaE. Early cleft lip and palate repair: Experience of the National Orthopedic Hospital Enugu, Southeast Nigeria. J Cleft Lip Palate Craniofacial Anomalies. 2019;6(2):99. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/jclpca.jclpca_26_18
2.
GrollemundBGallianiESoupreVVazquezMPGuedeneyADanionA. L’impact des fentes labiopalatines sur les relations parents-enfant. Arch Pédiatrie. 2010;17(9):1380-1385. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2010.06.026
3.
RichardBRussellJMcMahonSPigottR. Results of randomized controlled trial of soft palate first versus hard palate first repair in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43(3):329-338. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/05-065.1
KristiantiniNKPHamidARRHSanjayaIGPHAdnyanaIMS. Epidemiologi penderita celah bibir dan langit- langit di rumah sakit umum pusat sanglah denpasar tahun 2016-2019. J Med udayana. 2021;10(12):96–99.
6.
SertGCalisMSusluAEOzgurF. Effect of cleft palate repair with vomer flap on incidence and severity of obstructive sleep apnea. Eur J Plast Surg. 2021;44(6):779-784. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-021-01818-0
7.
WilladsenE. Influence of timing of hard palate repair in a two-stage procedure on early speech development in Danish children with cleft palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2012;49(5):574-595. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/09-120
8.
LohmanderAFriedeHLiljaJ. Long-term, longitudinal follow-up of individuals with unilateral cleft lip and palate after the Gothenburg primary early veloplasty and delayed hard palate closure protocol: Speech outcome. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2012;49(6):657-671. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/11-085
9.
SadhuP. Oronasal fistula in cleft palate surgery. Indian J Plast Surg Off Publ Assoc Plast Surg India. 2009;42(Suppl):S123-S128. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.57203
10.
KobusK. Extended vomer flap in the early repair of a cleft palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1987;21(1):95-102. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/02844318709083586
11.
CuzalinaAJungC. Rhinoplasty for the cleft lip and palate patient. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2016;28(2):189-202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2015.12.002
12.
LiaoYFLeeYHWangR, et al.Vomer flap for hard palate repair is related to favorable maxillary growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(4):1269-1276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1084-2
13.
LeeYHLiaoYF. Hard palate-repair technique and facial growth in patients with cleft lip and palate: A systematic review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51(8):851-857. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BJOMS.2013.08.012
14.
DeshpandeGWendbyLJagtapRSchönmeyrB. The efficacy of vomer flap for closure of hard palate during primary lip repair. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2015;68(7):940-945. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.03.034
15.
YangIYLiaoYF. The effect of 1-stage versus 2-stage palate repair on facial growth in patients with cleft lip and palate: A review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39(10):945-950. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.04.053
16.
Martin-SmithJDFitzgeraldLOrrDJA. How reliable is the vomer flap in early hard palate repair?J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2017;70(6):828-832. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BJPS.2017.02.026
17.
BeckerMHanssonE. Low rate of fistula formation after Sommerlad palatoplasty with or without lateral incisions: An analysis of risk factors for formation of fistulas after palatoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2013;66(5):697-703. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2013.01.031
18.
RussellKLongREHathawayR, et al.The americleft study: An inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate part 5. General discussion and conclusions. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2011;48(3):265-270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/09-187.1
19.
PhuaYSde ChalainT. Incidence of oronasal fistulae and velopharyngeal insufficiency after cleft palate repair: An audit of 211 children born between 1990 and 2004. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2008;45(2):172-178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/06-205.1
20.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J.. 2021 Mar;372:n71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
ZhangYZhouLLiuX, et al.The modified Jadad scale. https://doi.org/101371/journal.pone0120884.t001. Published online 2015.
23.
de JongJPBreugemCC. Early hard palate closure using a vomer flap in unilateral cleft lip and palate: Effects on cleft width. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(4):1285-1290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1091-3
24.
MaggiulliFHayNMarsMWorrellEGreenJSommerladB. Early effect of vomerine flap closure of the hard palate at the time of lip repair on the alveolar gap and other maxillary dimensions. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2014;51(1):43-48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/11-297
25.
AhtiVAlaluusuaSRautioJLeikolaJHukkiJSaarikkoA. Speech of patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(3):e291-e296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006242
26.
ElfatahMKAAEl-AnwarMWQuribaAS. Early functional outcome of two surgical protocols used in the repair of complete unilateral cleft lip palate. Ann Pediatr Surg. 2014;10(4):99-106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.XPS.0000452062.30697.91
27.
XuXCaoCZhengQShiB. The influence of four different treatment protocols on maxillofacial growth in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip, palate, and alveolus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(1):180-186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005711
28.
AlamMKIidaJSatoYKajiiTS. Postnatal treatment factors affecting craniofacial morphology of unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients in a Japanese population. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51(8):e205-e210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.10.001
29.
GaneshPMurthyJUlaghanathanNSavithaVH. A randomized controlled trial comparing two techniques for unilateral cleft lip and palate: Growth and speech outcomes during mixed dentition. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2015;43(6):790-795. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.03.033
30.
WongLSLuTCHangDTDChenPKT. The impact of facial growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with 2 different protocols. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;84(5):541-544. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002232
31.
AgrawalKPandaKN. Use of vomer flap in palatoplasty: Revisited. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43(1):30-37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/04-034.1
32.
FerdousKMNSalekAJMIslamMKDasBKKhanARKarimMS. Repair of cleft lip and simultaneous repair of cleft hard palate with vomer flap in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate: A comparative study. Pediatr Surg Int. 2010;26(10):995-1000. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-010-2643-0
