Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

To compare lower lip changes after Le Fort I advancement surgery in patients with a cleft.

Design

Single institution, retrospective review.

Setting

Academic tertiary referral hospital.

Patients, Participants

Skeletally mature patients with a cleft who underwent one-piece Le Fort I advancement surgery who had a lateral cephalogram or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan preoperatively and at least 6 months postoperatively. Patients who underwent concomitant mandibular surgery or genioplasty were excluded. 64 patients were included: 45 male and 19 female, 25 with BCLP and 39 with UCLP. The mean age at surgery was 18.4 years.

Interventions

Single jaw one-piece Le Fort I advancement surgery.

Main Outcome Measures

Standard lateral cephalometric landmarks of the bony skeleton and soft tissue were compared before and after Le Fort I advancement. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated to measure the correlation between lower lip position and other soft and hard tissue changes.

Results

After comparable maxillary advancements [BCLP: 7.2 mm (95% CI: 6.2-8.3 mm), UCLP: 6.4 mm (95% CI: 5.7-7.0 mm)] the horizontal upper-to-lower lip discrepancy significantly improved in both groups. The lower lip became thinner and more posteriorly positioned. Changes in lower lip position correlated strongly with mandibular bony landmarks and moderately with upper lip position, but poorly with maxillary landmarks.

Conclusions

Le Fort I advancement results in posterior displacement of the lower lip and better lip competence, thereby improving facial harmony. This lower lip change is not predictable by degree of maxillary advancement, and does not differ in patients with BCLP vs. UCLP.

Keywords

cleft lip and palate orthognathic surgery malocclusion lip form

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Langeveld

Bruun

Koudstaal

Padwa

. Etiology of cleft lip lower lip deformity: Use of an objective analysis to measure severity. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019;56(10):1333‐1339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665619853373

Good

Mulliken

Padwa

. Frequency of Le Fort I osteotomy after repaired cleft lip and palate or cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007;44(4):396‐401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/06-075.1

Stella

Streater

Epker

Sinn

. Predictability of upper lip soft tissue changes with maxillary advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989;47(7):697‐703. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-2391(89)80008-4

Crerand

Sarwer

Kazak

Clarke

Rumsey

. Body image and quality of life in adolescents with craniofacial conditions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(1):2‐12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/15-167

Bhat

Shetty

Khan

Husain

Ragher

. Evaluation of patient and parent satisfaction after orthodontic treatment/orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate deformity. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019;11(Suppl 2):S184‐S187. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_289_18

Sinko

Jagsch

Prechtl

Watzinger

Hollmann

Baumann

. Evaluation of esthetic, functional, and quality-of-life outcome in adult cleft lip and palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42(4):355‐361. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/03-142.1

Meyer-Marcotty

Stellzig-Eisenhauer

. Dentofacial self-perception and social perception of adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate. J Orofac Orthop. 2009;70(3):224‐236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-009-8813-9

Marcusson

Paulin

Ostrup

. Facial appearance in adults who had cleft lip and palate treated in childhood. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2002;36(1):16‐23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/028443102753478327

Ewing

Ross

. Soft tissue response to orthognathic surgery in persons with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993;30(3):320‐327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_1993_030_0320_strtos_2.3.co_2

10.

Vasudavan

Jayaratne

Padwa

. Nasolabial soft tissue changes after Le Fort I advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(4):e270‐e277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.11.022

11.

Pensler

Mulliken

. The cleft lip lower-lip deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82(4):602‐610. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198810000-00007

12.

Zhu

Senewiratne

Pigott

. Lip posture and mouth width in children with unilateral cleft lip. Br J Plast Surg. 1994;47(5):301‐305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(94)90086-8

13.

Abeltins

Jakobsone

. Soft tissue thickness changes after correcting Class III malocclusion with bimaxillar surgery. Stomatologija. 2011;13(3):87‐91.

14.

Park

Koh

Choi

. Lower lip deformity in patients with cleft and non-cleft Class III malocclusion before and after orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(8):1638‐1642. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.07.029

15.

Al-Waheidi

Harradine

. Soft tissue profile changes in patients with cleft lip and palate following maxillary osteotomies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998;35(6):535‐543. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_1998_035_0535_stpcip_2.3.co_2

16.

Duffy

Noar

Evans

Sanders

. Three-dimensional analysis of the child cleft face. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37(2):137‐144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_2000_037_0137_tdaotc_2.3.co_2

17.

Carvajal

Miralles

Cauvi

Berger

Carvajal

Bull

. Superior orbicularis oris muscle activity in children with and without cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29(1):32‐36; discussion 36-7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_1992_029_0032_soomai_2.3.co_2

18.

Ravera

Miralles

Santander

Valenzuela

Villaneuva

Zuniga

. Comparative study between children with and without cleft lip and cleft palate, part 2: Electromyographic analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37(3):286‐291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_2000_037_0286_csbcwa_2.3.co_2

19.

Szyszka-Sommerfeld

Wozniak

Matthews-Brzozowska

Kawala

Mikulewicz

. Electromyographic analysis of superior orbicularis oris muscle function in children surgically treated for unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45(9):1547‐1551. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2017.06.012

20.

DeLuke

Marchand

Robles

Fox

. Facial growth and the need for orthognathic surgery after cleft palate repair: Literature review and report of 28 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55(7):694‐697; discussion 697-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-2391(97)90579-6

21.

Hui

Hagg

Tideman

. Soft tissue changes following maxillary osteotomies in cleft lip and palate and non-cleft patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1994;22(3):182‐186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-5182(05)80386-5

22.

Zhang

Zhu

Tang

Chen

Fang

. [Correlation between the changes of soft and hard tissue after advanced Lefort I osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate]. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2000;9(4):205‐206.

23.

Lai

Lin

Denadai

. Cheek soft tissue prediction in cleft orthognathic surgery: A 3D computer-assisted investigation with comparative analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74(10):2683‐2693. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.030

24.

Freihofer

Jr . Changes in nasal profile after maxillary advancement in cleft and non-cleft patients. J Maxillofac Surg. 1977;5(1):20‐27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-0503(77)80071-4

Change in Lower Lip Position After Le Fort I Advancement in Patients with Bilateral vs. Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

Abstract

Objective

Design

Setting

Patients, Participants

Interventions

Main Outcome Measures

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References